Literature DB >> 27807731

Who will have Sustainable Employment After a Back Injury? The Development of a Clinical Prediction Model in a Cohort of Injured Workers.

Heather M Shearer1,2, Pierre Côté3,4,5, Eleanor Boyle5,6, Jill A Hayden7, John Frank8, William G Johnson9.   

Abstract

Purpose Our objective was to develop a clinical prediction model to identify workers with sustainable employment following an episode of work-related low back pain (LBP). Methods We used data from a cohort study of injured workers with incident LBP claims in the USA to predict employment patterns 1 and 6 months following a workers' compensation claim. We developed three sequential models to determine the contribution of three domains of variables: (1) basic demographic/clinical variables; (2) health-related variables; and (3) work-related factors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop the predictive models. We constructed receiver operator curves and used the c-index to measure predictive accuracy. Results Seventy-nine percent and 77 % of workers had sustainable employment at 1 and 6 months, respectively. Sustainable employment at 1 month was predicted by initial back pain intensity, mental health-related quality of life, claim litigation and employer type (c-index = 0.77). At 6 months, sustainable employment was predicted by physical and mental health-related quality of life, claim litigation and employer type (c-index = 0.77). Adding health-related and work-related variables to models improved predictive accuracy by 8.5 and 10 % at 1 and 6 months respectively. Conclusion We developed clinically-relevant models to predict sustainable employment in injured workers who made a workers' compensation claim for LBP. Inquiring about back pain intensity, physical and mental health-related quality of life, claim litigation and employer type may be beneficial in developing programs of care. Our models need to be validated in other populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back injuries; Employment; Return to work

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27807731     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-016-9678-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  34 in total

1.  Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries.

Authors:  S Hogg-Johnson; D C Cole
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Biopsychosocial multivariate predictive model of occupational low back disability.

Authors:  Izabela Z Schultz; Joan M Crook; Jonathan Berkowitz; Gregory R Meloche; Ruth Milner; Oonagh A Zuberbier; Wendy Meloche
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Length of disability prognosis in acute occupational low back pain: development and testing of a practical approach.

Authors:  Glenn S Pransky; Santosh K Verma; Lee Okurowski; Barbara Webster
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

5.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments.

Authors:  A J H M Beurskens; H C W de Vet; A J A Köke
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Characterizing the course of low back pain: a latent class analysis.

Authors:  Kate M Dunn; Kelvin Jordan; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties.

Authors:  J A Kopec; J M Esdaile; M Abrahamowicz; L Abenhaim; S Wood-Dauphinee; D L Lamping; J I Williams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A prediction rule for shoulder pain related sick leave: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ton Kuijpers; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Geert J M G van der Heijden; Jos W R Twisk; Yvonne Vergouwe; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.