Literature DB >> 10647169

Beyond the good prognosis. Examination of an inception cohort of patients with chronic low back pain.

T S Carey1, J M Garrett, A M Jackman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A 22-month prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the course of an inception cohort of patients with chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is a debilitating condition with great medical and social cost.
METHODS: A cohort of 1246 patients with acute low back pain who sought treatment from 208 North Carolina providers was observed. Patients who developed chronic low back pain were identified. Entry criteria were back pain of less than 10 weeks' duration, no previous care for this episode of low back pain, no previous spine surgery, not pregnant, no nonskin malignancy, and access to a telephone. The providers were of four types: primary care medical doctors, doctors of Chiropractic, orthopedic surgeons, and health maintenance organization-based primary care providers. Patients were contacted by telephone shortly after enrollment and at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks, with a final interview at 22 months. Patient functional status, care-seeking, and satisfaction were evaluated.
RESULTS: Ninety-six patients had chronic, continuous symptoms for 3 months, forming the inception cohort of chronic low back pain. A valid, reliable measure of back-specific functional disability also was used. Predictors of the development of chronicity were poor baseline functional status and sciatica. A more powerful predictor of chronicity was poor functional status at 4 weeks. Two thirds of patients with chronic low back pain at 3 months had functionally disabling symptoms at 22 months, and a majority of these were employed. Satisfaction with care was low. Forty-six patients (2.6% of the entire cohort) underwent surgery, with no statistically significant difference in surgical rates among initial provider strata. Patients who underwent surgery after 3 months had a Roland disability score at 22 months of 10 (7.7, 12.3). Forty-one percent of patients with chronic low back pain see an orthopedic or neurologic surgeon. Chronic low back pain occurs in 7.7% of patients who seek care for acute low back pain, with unremitting pain for 22 months in 4.7%.
CONCLUSION: Once established, chronic low back pain is persistent. Most patients with chronic low back pain seek little care, and a majority are employed. Future research should emphasize maintenance of employment and function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10647169     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200001010-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  49 in total

1.  Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain.

Authors:  Douglas Paul Gross; Michele Crites Battié
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

2.  Responding to the challenge of clinically relevant osteopathic research: efficacy and beyond.

Authors:  John C Licciardone
Journal:  Int J Osteopath Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.149

Review 3.  Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christian D Mallen; George Peat; Elaine Thomas; Kate M Dunn; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  [Risk minimization in pain therapy: important target but how can it be reached?].

Authors:  G-G Hanekop; F B M Ensink
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study.

Authors:  Brian C Clark; David W Russ; Masato Nakazawa; Christopher R France; Stevan Walkowski; Timothy D Law; Megan Applegate; Niladri Mahato; Samuel Lietkam; James Odenthal; Daniel Corcos; Simeon Hain; Betty Sindelar; Robert J Ploutz-Snyder; James S Thomas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Physical therapy for low back pain: what is it, and when do we offer it to patients?

Authors:  Timothy S Carey; Janet Freburger
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Short- or Long-Term Treatment of Spinal Disability in Older Adults With Manipulation and Exercise.

Authors:  Michele Maiers; Jan Hartvigsen; Roni Evans; Kristine Westrom; Qi Wang; Craig Schulz; Brent Leininger; Gert Bronfort
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  Extending conceptual frameworks: life course epidemiology for the study of back pain.

Authors:  Kate M Dunn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  A long way to go: practice patterns and evidence in chronic low back pain care.

Authors:  Timothy S Carey; Janet K Freburger; George M Holmes; Liana Castel; Jane Darter; Robert Agans; William Kalsbeek; Anne Jackman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study.

Authors:  Luciola da C Menezes Costa; Christopher G Maher; James H McAuley; Mark J Hancock; Robert D Herbert; Kathryn M Refshauge; Nicholas Henschke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.