Literature DB >> 17693087

Between-day reliability of repeated plantar pressure distribution measurements in a normal population.

Jason K Gurney1, Uwe G Kersting, Dieter Rosenbaum.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the reliability of repeated plantar pressure distribution measurements during normal gait across multiple testing sessions. Testing sessions were conducted on 5 separate days at approximately the same time of day. Nine subjects (five males, four females, age 26+/-8.4 years) who were free of any musculoskeletal injury were recruited. A capacitive pressure distribution platform (EMED AT, Novel GmbH, Munich, Germany), sampling at 50Hz was used to collect plantar pressure patterns during barefoot walking at a self-selected speed. Four parameters were investigated: peak pressure, maximum force, impulse, and contact time, and these were investigated in 10 areas of the foot after using the PRC mask method of subdividing the foot into ten anatomical areas of interest. Individual means of all the five repeated trials for each foot were calculated, and these values were used to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CoV) for all parameters. The results of this investigation show a generally good level of reliability, the quality of which is dependent on the region of the foot and the parameter investigated. Areas with typically high loading characteristics, such as the central forefoot showed a higher level of reliability in the ICC's (>0.9) than less loaded areas such as the medial midfoot (<0.8). The conclusion of this study is that plantar pressure distribution measurements can be used in comparative evaluations since the measures of repeatability are satisfactory for the parameters and foot regions usually used in the investigation of clinical populations such as neuropathic diabetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17693087     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  29 in total

1.  Gait recognition: highly unique dynamic plantar pressure patterns among 104 individuals.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky; Tingting Mu; Kerstin Bosch; Dieter Rosenbaum; John Y Goulermas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Classifying sitting, standing, and walking using plantar force data.

Authors:  Kohle J Merry; Evan Macdonald; Megan MacPherson; Omar Aziz; Edward Park; Michael Ryan; Carolyn J Sparrey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  The reliability of plantar pressure assessment during barefoot level walking in children aged 7-11 years.

Authors:  Stephen D Cousins; Stewart C Morrison; Wendy I Drechsler
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  MEDIAL FOOT LOADING ON ANKLE AND KNEE BIOMECHANICS.

Authors:  Lyneil C J Mitchell; Kevin R Ford; Stephen Minning; Gregory D Myer; Robert E Mangine; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-08-01

5.  Are Pressure Time Integral and Cumulative Plantar Stress Related to First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Pain? Results From a Community-Based Study.

Authors:  Smita Rao; K Douglas Gross; Jingbo Niu; Michael C Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James C Torner; Jean Hietpas; David Felson; Howard J Hillstrom
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  The accuracy of an automasking algorithm in plantar pressure measurements.

Authors:  Scott J Ellis; Hill Stoecklein; Joseph C Yu; Grisha Syrkin; Howard Hillstrom; Jonathan T Deland
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-11-30

7.  Reliability of the TekScan MatScan(R) system for the measurement of plantar forces and pressures during barefoot level walking in healthy adults.

Authors:  Gerard V Zammit; Hylton B Menz; Shannon E Munteanu
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Foot Type Biomechanics Part 2: are structure and anthropometrics related to function?

Authors:  Rajshree Mootanah; Jinsup Song; Mark W Lenhoff; Jocelyn F Hafer; Sherry I Backus; David Gagnon; Jonathan T Deland; Howard J Hillstrom
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Foot type biomechanics part 1: structure and function of the asymptomatic foot.

Authors:  Howard J Hillstrom; Jinsup Song; Andrew P Kraszewski; Jocelyn F Hafer; Rajshree Mootanah; Alyssa B Dufour; Betty Shingpui Chow; Jonathan T Deland
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 10.  Musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle: assessments and treatment options.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Jody L Riskowski; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.098

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.