Literature DB >> 22294959

The accuracy of an automasking algorithm in plantar pressure measurements.

Scott J Ellis, Hill Stoecklein, Joseph C Yu, Grisha Syrkin, Howard Hillstrom, Jonathan T Deland.   

Abstract

Masking algorithms provide a way to analyze plantar pressure parameters based on distinct anatomical regions of the foot. No study has addressed their accuracy. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the Novel® ten-region standard masking algorithm in both dynamic and static measurements in normal feet. Static and dynamic plantar pressure measurements were collected from ten normal subjects (20 ft) with and without 10-mm radiopaque markers placed under the first through fifth metatarsal heads, fifth metatarsal base, and first proximal phalanx. The automask was then applied to subdivide the foot into distinct anatomical areas. Weight-bearing AP radiographs were obtained with and without markers. Plantar pressures and radiographs were overlaid. The percent accuracy of each marker within its appropriate mask region was calculated. The average accuracies of the automasking algorithm regions for dynamic and static measurements, respectively, were 98.8% and 90.4% (1MH), 89.9% and 80.6% (2MH), 98.6% and 81.4% (3MH), 96.8% and 82.3% (4MH), 93.1% and 80.8% (5MH), 97.3% and 92.5% (5MB), and 91.2% and 64.2% (1PPH). Marker presence did not alter foot structure or function as determined by intermetatarsal angles (range, p = 0.361 to p = 0.649) and the center of pressure excursion index (p = 0.727), respectively. The automasking algorithm accurately identifies most foot regions in normal feet, particularly in gait. Such accuracy may be reduced in the setting of foot deformity. Understanding the accuracy of masking algorithms may help guide the interpretation of plantar pressure measurements and ultimately both conservative and operative treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; algorithm; anatomical masking; dynamic; normal foot; plantar pressure; static

Year:  2010        PMID: 22294959      PMCID: PMC3026114          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-010-9185-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  26 in total

1.  Reliability and running speed effects of in-shoe loading measurements during slow treadmill running.

Authors:  T W Kernozek; K A Zimmer
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  Ground reaction forces at discrete sites of the foot derived from pressure plate measurements.

Authors:  S C Wearing; S R Urry; J E Smeathers
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Efficacy of plantar loading parameters during gait in terms of reliability, variability, effect of gender and relationship between contact area and plantar pressure.

Authors:  Darlene F Murphy; Bruce D Beynnon; James D Michelson; Pamela M Vacek
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Assessment of sub-division of plantar pressure measurement in children.

Authors:  J A Stebbins; M E Harrington; C Giacomozzi; N Thompson; A Zavatsky; T N Theologis
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Clinicians' assessment of the hindfoot: a study of reliability.

Authors:  Anne-Maree Keenan; Timothy M Bach
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Long distance running increases plantar pressures beneath the metatarsal heads: a barefoot walking investigation of 200 marathon runners.

Authors:  Arne Nagel; Frauke Fernholz; Carolin Kibele; Dieter Rosenbaum
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Reliability of an in-shoe pressure measurement system during treadmill walking.

Authors:  T W Kernozek; E E LaMott; M J Dancisak
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.827

8.  Dynamic pedobarograph in evaluation of varus and valgus foot deformities.

Authors:  Chia Hsieh Chang; Freeman Miller; Jill Schuyler
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing.

Authors:  P R Cavanagh; M M Rodgers; A Iiboshi
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1987-04

10.  Plantar pressure and radiographic changes after distal calcaneal lengthening in children and adolescents.

Authors:  J S Davitt; B A MacWilliams; P F Armstrong
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  4 in total

1.  In Vivo Plantar Pressures in Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Compared to Control Using an Intraoperative Pedobarographic Device.

Authors:  Aoife MacMahon; Howard J Hillstrom; Huong T Do; Jeremy Y Chan; Jonathan T Deland; Scott J Ellis
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-02-28

2.  Are Pressure Time Integral and Cumulative Plantar Stress Related to First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Pain? Results From a Community-Based Study.

Authors:  Smita Rao; K Douglas Gross; Jingbo Niu; Michael C Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James C Torner; Jean Hietpas; David Felson; Howard J Hillstrom
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Reliability of plantar pressure platforms.

Authors:  Jocelyn F Hafer; Mark W Lenhoff; Jinsup Song; Joanne M Jordan; Marian T Hannan; Howard J Hillstrom
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Foot type biomechanics part 1: structure and function of the asymptomatic foot.

Authors:  Howard J Hillstrom; Jinsup Song; Andrew P Kraszewski; Jocelyn F Hafer; Rajshree Mootanah; Alyssa B Dufour; Betty Shingpui Chow; Jonathan T Deland
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.840

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.