Literature DB >> 33420617

Classifying sitting, standing, and walking using plantar force data.

Kohle J Merry1, Evan Macdonald2, Megan MacPherson3, Omar Aziz2, Edward Park2, Michael Ryan4,5, Carolyn J Sparrey2.   

Abstract

Prolonged static weight-bearing at work may increase the risk of developing plantar fasciitis (PF). However, to establish a causal relationship between weight-bearing and PF, a low-cost objective measure of workplace behaviors is needed. This proof-of-concept study assesses the classification accuracy and sensitivity of low-resolution plantar pressure measurements in distinguishing workplace postures. Plantar pressure was measured using an in-shoe measurement system in eight healthy participants while sitting, standing, and walking. Data was resampled to simulate on/off characteristics of 24 plantar force sensitive resistors. The top 10 sensors were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation with machine learning algorithms: support vector machines (SVMs), decision tree (DT), discriminant analysis (DA), and k-nearest neighbors (KNN). SVM and DT best classified sitting, standing, and walking. High classification accuracy was obtained with five sensors (98.6% and 99.1% accuracy, respectively) and even a single sensor (98.4% and 98.4%, respectively). The central forefoot and the medial and lateral midfoot were the most important classification sensor locations. On/off plantar pressure measurements in the midfoot and central forefoot can accurately classify workplace postures. These results provide the foundation for a low-cost objective tool to classify and quantify sedentary workplace postures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pattern recognition; Pedobarography; Plantar fasciitis; Posture differentiation; Weight-bearing

Year:  2021        PMID: 33420617     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-020-02297-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  23 in total

1.  Activity classification in users of ankle foot orthoses.

Authors:  Cameron M Archer; John Lach; Shanshan Chen; Mark F Abel; Bradford C Bennett
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  In-shoe plantar pressure measurement and analysis system based on fabric pressure sensing array.

Authors:  Lin Shu; Tao Hua; Yangyong Wang; Qiao Qiao Li; David Dagan Feng; Xiaoming Tao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2010-01-12

3.  Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior.

Authors:  Sarah Kozey-Keadle; Amanda Libertine; Kate Lyden; John Staudenmayer; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire.

Authors:  Josephine Y Chau; Hidde P Van Der Ploeg; Scott Dunn; John Kurko; Adrian E Bauman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Walking Intensity Estimation with a Portable Pedobarography System.

Authors:  Per Anders Rickard Hellstrom; Anna Åkerberg; Martin Ekström; Mia Folke
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2016

6.  Standing, sitting and associated working conditions in the Quebec population in 1998.

Authors:  F Tissot; K Messing; S Stock
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Evidence of health risks associated with prolonged standing at work and intervention effectiveness.

Authors:  Thomas R Waters; Robert B Dick
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 1.625

8.  Risk factors for plantar fasciitis among assembly plant workers.

Authors:  Robert A Werner; Nancy Gell; Anne Hartigan; Neal Wiggerman; William M Keyserling
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 9.  Associations of occupational standing with musculoskeletal symptoms: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pieter Coenen; Lisa Willenberg; Sharon Parry; Joyce W Shi; Lorena Romero; Diana M Blackwood; Christopher G Maher; Genevieve N Healy; David W Dunstan; Leon M Straker
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stéphanie A Prince; Kristi B Adamo; Meghan E Hamel; Jill Hardt; Sarah Connor Gorber; Mark Tremblay
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of an ankle-foot orthosis effect on gait transitional stability during ramp ascent/descent.

Authors:  Imran Mahmood; Anam Raza; Hafiz Farhan Maqbool; Abbas A Dehghani-Sanij
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Assessing Impact of Sensors and Feature Selection in Smart-Insole-Based Human Activity Recognition.

Authors:  Luigi D'Arco; Haiying Wang; Huiru Zheng
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  The Development and Concurrent Validity of a Multi-Sensor-Based Frailty Toolkit for In-Home Frailty Assessment.

Authors:  Chao Bian; Bing Ye; Alex Mihailidis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.847

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.