BACKGROUND: Many foot pathologies are associated with specific foot types. If foot structure and function are related, measurement of either could assist with differential diagnosis of pedal pathologies. HYPOTHESIS: Biomechanical measures of foot structure and function are related in asymptomatic healthy individuals. METHODS: Sixty-one healthy subjects' left feet were stratified into cavus (n=12), rectus (n=27) and planus (n=22) foot types. Foot structure was assessed by malleolar valgus index, arch height index, and arch height flexibility. Anthropometrics (height and weight), age, and walking speed were measured. Foot function was assessed by center of pressure excursion index, peak plantar pressure, maximum force, and gait pattern parameters. Foot structure and anthropometric variables were entered into stepwise linear regression models to identify predictors of function. RESULTS: Measures of foot structure and anthropometrics explained 10-37% of the model variance (adjusted R(2)) for gait pattern parameters. When walking speed was included, the adjusted R(2) increased to 45-77% but foot structure was no longer a factor. Foot structure and anthropometrics predicted 7-47% of the model variance for plantar pressure and 16-64% for maximum force parameters. All multivariate models were significant (p<0.05), supporting acceptance of the hypothesis. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Foot structure and function are related in asymptomatic healthy individuals. The structural parameters employed are basic measurements that do not require ionizing radiation and could be used in a clinical setting. Further research is needed to identify additional predictive parameters (plantar soft tissue characteristics, skeletal alignment, and neuromuscular control) and to include individuals with pathology.
BACKGROUND: Many foot pathologies are associated with specific foot types. If foot structure and function are related, measurement of either could assist with differential diagnosis of pedal pathologies. HYPOTHESIS: Biomechanical measures of foot structure and function are related in asymptomatic healthy individuals. METHODS: Sixty-one healthy subjects' left feet were stratified into cavus (n=12), rectus (n=27) and planus (n=22) foot types. Foot structure was assessed by malleolar valgus index, arch height index, and arch height flexibility. Anthropometrics (height and weight), age, and walking speed were measured. Foot function was assessed by center of pressure excursion index, peak plantar pressure, maximum force, and gait pattern parameters. Foot structure and anthropometric variables were entered into stepwise linear regression models to identify predictors of function. RESULTS: Measures of foot structure and anthropometrics explained 10-37% of the model variance (adjusted R(2)) for gait pattern parameters. When walking speed was included, the adjusted R(2) increased to 45-77% but foot structure was no longer a factor. Foot structure and anthropometrics predicted 7-47% of the model variance for plantar pressure and 16-64% for maximum force parameters. All multivariate models were significant (p<0.05), supporting acceptance of the hypothesis. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Foot structure and function are related in asymptomatic healthy individuals. The structural parameters employed are basic measurements that do not require ionizing radiation and could be used in a clinical setting. Further research is needed to identify additional predictive parameters (plantar soft tissue characteristics, skeletal alignment, and neuromuscular control) and to include individuals with pathology.
Authors: Jonathan C Levy; Mark S Mizel; L Samuel Wilson; William Fox; Kathleen McHale; Dean C Taylor; H Thomas Temple Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: William R Ledoux; Jane B Shofer; Douglas G Smith; Katrina Sullivan; Shane G Hayes; Mathieu Assal; Gayle E Reiber Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2005 Sep-Oct
Authors: Alice M Wong; Yu-Cheng Pei; Wei-Hsien Hong; Chia-Yin Chung; Yiu-Chung Lau; Carl P Chen Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Joseph J Krzak; Daniel M Corcos; Diane L Damiano; Adam Graf; Donald Hedeker; Peter A Smith; Gerald F Harris Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2014-11-10 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Thomas J Hagedorn; Alyssa B Dufour; Yvonne M Golightly; Jody L Riskowski; Howard J Hillstrom; Virginia A Casey; Marian T Hannan Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Karsten Hollander; Babette C van der Zwaard; Johanna Elsabe de Villiers; Klaus-Michael Braumann; Ranel Venter; Astrid Zech Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Kota Z Takahashi; Michael T Gross; Herman van Werkhoven; Stephen J Piazza; Gregory S Sawicki Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 4.379