Literature DB >> 12480070

Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks.

Jeremy M Wolfe1, Aude Oliva, Todd S Horowitz, Serena J Butcher, Aline Bompas.   

Abstract

In most visual search experiments in the laboratory, objects are presented on an isolated, blank background. In most real world search tasks, however, the background is continuous and can be complex. In six experiments, we examine the ability of the visual system to separate search items from a background. The results support a view in which objects are separated from backgrounds in a single, preattentive step. This is followed by a limited-capacity search process that selects objects that might be targets for further identification. Identity information regarding the object's status (target or distractor) then accumulates through a limited capacity parallel process. The main effect of background complexity is to slow the accumulation of information in this later recognition stage. It may be that recognition is slowed because background noise causes the preattentive segmentation stage to deliver less effectively segmented objects to later stages. Only when backgrounds become nearly identical to the search objects does the background have the effect of slowing item-by-item selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12480070     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00388-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  26 in total

1.  Search performance with discrete-cell stimulus arrays: filtered naturalistic images and probabilistic markers.

Authors:  Alan R Pinkus; Miriam J Poteet; Allan J Pantle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-03

2.  Assessing the effects of physical and perceived luminance contrast on RT and TMS-induced percepts.

Authors:  Ramisha Knight; Chiara Mazzi; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Contextual cuing by global features.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen J Flusberg; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-10

4.  Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen Flusberg; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  A theory of eye movements during target acquisition.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Time to Guide: Evidence for Delayed Attentional Guidance in Contextual Cueing.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen J Flusberg; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008

7.  A search-by-clusters model of visual search: fits to data from younger and older adults.

Authors:  William J Hoyer; John Cerella; Norbou G Buchler
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Visual search with image modification in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Emily Wiecek; Mary Lou Jackson; Steven C Dakin; Peter Bex
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Angular declination and the dynamic perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; John W Philbeck; Philip W Wirtz; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Spatial heterogeneity, predator cognition, and the evolution of color polymorphism in virtual prey.

Authors:  Alan B Bond; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.