Literature DB >> 17676885

Proteomic parsimony through bipartite graph analysis improves accuracy and transparency.

Bing Zhang1, Matthew C Chambers, David L Tabb.   

Abstract

Assembling peptides identified from LC-MS/MS spectra into a list of proteins is a critical step in analyzing shotgun proteomics data. As one peptide sequence can be mapped to multiple proteins in a database, naïve protein assembly can substantially overstate the number of proteins found in samples. We model the peptide-protein relationships in a bipartite graph and use efficient graph algorithms to identify protein clusters with shared peptides and to derive the minimal list of proteins. We test the effects of this parsimony analysis approach using MS/MS data sets generated from a defined human protein mixture, a yeast whole cell extract, and a human serum proteome after MARS column depletion. The results demonstrate that the bipartite parsimony technique not only simplifies protein lists but also improves the accuracy of protein identification. We use bipartite graphs for the visualization of the protein assembly results to render the parsimony analysis process transparent to users. Our approach also groups functionally related proteins together and improves the comprehensibility of the results. We have implemented the tool in the IDPicker package. The source code and binaries for this protein assembly pipeline are available under Mozilla Public License at the following URL: http://www.mc.vanderbilt.edu/msrc/bioinformatics/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17676885      PMCID: PMC2810678          DOI: 10.1021/pr070230d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  19 in total

1.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.

Authors:  Andrew Keller; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Eugene Kolker; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  The need for guidelines in publication of peptide and protein identification data: Working Group on Publication Guidelines for Peptide and Protein Identification Data.

Authors:  Steven Carr; Ruedi Aebersold; Michael Baldwin; Al Burlingame; Karl Clauser; Alexey Nesvizhskii
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  DBParser: web-based software for shotgun proteomic data analyses.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Yang; Vijay Dondeti; Rebecca Dezube; Dawn M Maynard; Lewis Y Geer; Jonathan Epstein; Xiongfong Chen; Sanford P Markey; Jeffrey A Kowalak
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  MS2Grouper: group assessment and synthetic replacement of duplicate proteomic tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  David L Tabb; Melissa R Thompson; Gurusahai Khalsa-Moyers; Nathan C VerBerkmoes; W Hayes McDonald
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Peptide charge state determination for low-resolution tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Aaron A Klammer; Christine C Wu; Michael J MacCoss; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf       Date:  2005

6.  MyriMatch: highly accurate tandem mass spectral peptide identification by multivariate hypergeometric analysis.

Authors:  David L Tabb; Christopher G Fernando; Matthew C Chambers
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Minimum reporting requirements for proteomics: a MIAPE primer.

Authors:  Chris F Taylor
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.984

8.  DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  David L Tabb; W Hayes McDonald; John R Yates
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Head-to-head comparison of serum fractionation techniques.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Heidi Zhang; Jimmy K Eng; Ruihua Fang; Brian D Piening; Li-Chia Feng; Travis D Lorentzen; Regine M Schoenherr; John F Keane; Ted Holzman; Matthew Fitzgibbon; ChenWei Lin; Hui Zhang; Kelly Cooke; Tao Liu; David G Camp; Leigh Anderson; Julian Watts; Richard D Smith; Martin W McIntosh; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Data management and preliminary data analysis in the pilot phase of the HUPO Plasma Proteome Project.

Authors:  Marcin Adamski; Thomas Blackwell; Rajasree Menon; Lennart Martens; Henning Hermjakob; Chris Taylor; Gilbert S Omenn; David J States
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.984

View more
  173 in total

1.  Direct maximization of protein identifications from tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Marina Spivak; Jason Weston; Daniela Tomazela; Michael J MacCoss; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Generic comparison of protein inference engines.

Authors:  Manfred Claassen; Lukas Reiter; Michael O Hengartner; Joachim M Buhmann; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Identifying proteomic LC-MS/MS data sets with Bumbershoot and IDPicker.

Authors:  Jerry D Holman; Ze-Qiang Ma; David L Tabb
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-03

4.  Protein and gene model inference based on statistical modeling in k-partite graphs.

Authors:  Sarah Gerster; Ermir Qeli; Christian H Ahrens; Peter Bühlmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Generating and navigating proteome maps using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Christian H Ahrens; Erich Brunner; Ermir Qeli; Konrad Basler; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  The 2012/2013 ABRF Proteomic Research Group Study: Assessing Longitudinal Intralaboratory Variability in Routine Peptide Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analyses.

Authors:  Keiryn L Bennett; Xia Wang; Cory E Bystrom; Matthew C Chambers; Tracy M Andacht; Larry J Dangott; Félix Elortza; John Leszyk; Henrik Molina; Robert L Moritz; Brett S Phinney; J Will Thompson; Maureen K Bunger; David L Tabb
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Release of skeletal muscle peptide fragments identifies individual proteins degraded during insulin deprivation in type 1 diabetic humans and mice.

Authors:  Matthew M Robinson; Surendra Dasari; Helen Karakelides; H Robert Bergen; K Sreekumaran Nair
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.310

8.  Biotinylated probes for the analysis of protein modification by electrophiles.

Authors:  Simona G Codreanu; Hye-Young H Kim; Ned A Porter; Daniel C Liebler
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

9.  Sources of technical variability in quantitative LC-MS proteomics: human brain tissue sample analysis.

Authors:  Paul D Piehowski; Vladislav A Petyuk; Daniel J Orton; Fang Xie; Ronald J Moore; Manuel Ramirez-Restrepo; Anzhelika Engel; Andrew P Lieberman; Roger L Albin; David G Camp; Richard D Smith; Amanda J Myers
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Identification of candidate biomarkers with cancer-specific glycosylation in the tissue and serum of endometrioid ovarian cancer patients by glycoproteomic analysis.

Authors:  Karen L Abbott; Jae-Min Lim; Lance Wells; Benedict B Benigno; John F McDonald; Michael Pierce
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.