Literature DB >> 17269722

MyriMatch: highly accurate tandem mass spectral peptide identification by multivariate hypergeometric analysis.

David L Tabb1, Christopher G Fernando, Matthew C Chambers.   

Abstract

Shotgun proteomics experiments are dependent upon database search engines to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra. Many of these algorithms score potential identifications by evaluating the number of fragment ions matched between each peptide sequence and an observed spectrum. These systems, however, generally do not distinguish between matching an intense peak and matching a minor peak. We have developed a statistical model to score peptide matches that is based upon the multivariate hypergeometric distribution. This scorer, part of the "MyriMatch" database search engine, places greater emphasis on matching intense peaks. The probability that the best match for each spectrum has occurred by random chance can be employed to separate correct matches from random ones. We evaluated this software on data sets from three different laboratories employing three different ion trap instruments. Employing a novel system for testing discrimination, we demonstrate that stratifying peaks into multiple intensity classes improves the discrimination of scoring. We compare MyriMatch results to those of Sequest and X!Tandem, revealing that it is capable of higher discrimination than either of these algorithms. When minimal peak filtering is employed, performance plummets for a scoring model that does not stratify matched peaks by intensity. On the other hand, we find that MyriMatch discrimination improves as more peaks are retained in each spectrum. MyriMatch also scales well to tandem mass spectra from high-resolution mass analyzers. These findings may indicate limitations for existing database search scorers that count matched peaks without differentiating them by intensity. This software and source code is available under Mozilla Public License at this URL: http://www.mc.vanderbilt.edu/msrc/bioinformatics/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17269722      PMCID: PMC2525619          DOI: 10.1021/pr0604054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  19 in total

1.  De novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  V Dancík; T A Addona; K R Clauser; J E Vath; P A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  1999 Fall-Winter       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results.

Authors:  Roger E Moore; Mary K Young; Terry D Lee
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  A hypergeometric probability model for protein identification and validation using tandem mass spectral data and protein sequence databases.

Authors:  Rovshan G Sadygov; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Robertson Craig; Ronald C Beavis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Open mass spectrometry search algorithm.

Authors:  Lewis Y Geer; Sanford P Markey; Jeffrey A Kowalak; Lukas Wagner; Ming Xu; Dawn M Maynard; Xiaoyu Yang; Wenyao Shi; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  MASPIC: intensity-based tandem mass spectrometry scoring scheme that improves peptide identification at high confidence.

Authors:  Chandrasegaran Narasimhan; David L Tabb; Nathan C Verberkmoes; Melissa R Thompson; Robert L Hettich; Edward C Uberbacher
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  David L Tabb; W Hayes McDonald; John R Yates
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology.

Authors:  M P Washburn; D Wolters; J R Yates
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Determination and comparison of the baseline proteomes of the versatile microbe Rhodopseudomonas palustris under its major metabolic states.

Authors:  Nathan C VerBerkmoes; Manesh B Shah; Patricia K Lankford; Dale A Pelletier; Michael B Strader; David L Tabb; W Hayes McDonald; John W Barton; Gregory B Hurst; Loren Hauser; Brian H Davison; J Thomas Beatty; Caroline S Harwood; F Robert Tabita; Robert L Hettich; Frank W Larimer
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Global survey of organ and organelle protein expression in mouse: combined proteomic and transcriptomic profiling.

Authors:  Thomas Kislinger; Brian Cox; Anitha Kannan; Clement Chung; Pingzhao Hu; Alexandr Ignatchenko; Michelle S Scott; Anthony O Gramolini; Quaid Morris; Michael T Hallett; Janet Rossant; Timothy R Hughes; Brendan Frey; Andrew Emili
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  272 in total

1.  De novo sequencing and homology searching.

Authors:  Bin Ma; Richard Johnson
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  A highly efficient multifunctional tandem affinity purification approach applicable to diverse organisms.

Authors:  Hanhui Ma; Janel R McLean; Lucy Fang-I Chao; Sebastian Mana-Capelli; Murugan Paramasivam; Kirsten A Hagstrom; Kathleen L Gould; Dannel McCollum
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Identifying proteomic LC-MS/MS data sets with Bumbershoot and IDPicker.

Authors:  Jerry D Holman; Ze-Qiang Ma; David L Tabb
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-03

4.  Supporting tool suite for production proteomics.

Authors:  Ze-Qiang Ma; David L Tabb; Joseph Burden; Matthew C Chambers; Matthew B Cox; Michael J Cantrell; Amy-Joan L Ham; Michael D Litton; Michael R Oreto; William C Schultz; Scott M Sobecki; Tina Y Tsui; Gregory R Wernke; Daniel C Liebler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Protein and gene model inference based on statistical modeling in k-partite graphs.

Authors:  Sarah Gerster; Ermir Qeli; Christian H Ahrens; Peter Bühlmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Data analysis strategy for maximizing high-confidence protein identifications in complex proteomes such as human tumor secretomes and human serum.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Hsin-Yao Tang; Glenn C Tan; David W Speicher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  The 2012/2013 ABRF Proteomic Research Group Study: Assessing Longitudinal Intralaboratory Variability in Routine Peptide Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analyses.

Authors:  Keiryn L Bennett; Xia Wang; Cory E Bystrom; Matthew C Chambers; Tracy M Andacht; Larry J Dangott; Félix Elortza; John Leszyk; Henrik Molina; Robert L Moritz; Brett S Phinney; J Will Thompson; Maureen K Bunger; David L Tabb
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  The effects of micronutrient deficiencies on bacterial species from the human gut microbiota.

Authors:  Matthew C Hibberd; Meng Wu; Dmitry A Rodionov; Xiaoqing Li; Jiye Cheng; Nicholas W Griffin; Michael J Barratt; Richard J Giannone; Robert L Hettich; Andrei L Osterman; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Proteolytic processing of lysyl oxidase-like-2 in the extracellular matrix is required for crosslinking of basement membrane collagen IV.

Authors:  Alberto J López-Jiménez; Trayambak Basak; Roberto M Vanacore
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Microbial metaproteomics for characterizing the range of metabolic functions and activities of human gut microbiota.

Authors:  Weili Xiong; Paul E Abraham; Zhou Li; Chongle Pan; Robert L Hettich
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.