Literature DB >> 23495885

Sources of technical variability in quantitative LC-MS proteomics: human brain tissue sample analysis.

Paul D Piehowski1, Vladislav A Petyuk, Daniel J Orton, Fang Xie, Ronald J Moore, Manuel Ramirez-Restrepo, Anzhelika Engel, Andrew P Lieberman, Roger L Albin, David G Camp, Richard D Smith, Amanda J Myers.   

Abstract

To design a robust quantitative proteomics study, an understanding of both the inherent heterogeneity of the biological samples being studied as well as the technical variability of the proteomics methods and platform is needed. Additionally, accurately identifying the technical steps associated with the largest variability would provide valuable information for the improvement and design of future processing pipelines. We present an experimental strategy that allows for a detailed examination of the variability of the quantitative LC-MS proteomics measurements. By replicating analyses at different stages of processing, various technical components can be estimated and their individual contribution to technical variability can be dissected. This design can be easily adapted to other quantitative proteomics pipelines. Herein, we applied this methodology to our label-free workflow for the processing of human brain tissue. For this application, the pipeline was divided into four critical components: Tissue dissection and homogenization (extraction), protein denaturation followed by trypsin digestion and SPE cleanup (digestion), short-term run-to-run instrumental response fluctuation (instrumental variance), and long-term drift of the quantitative response of the LC-MS/MS platform over the 2 week period of continuous analysis (instrumental stability). From this analysis, we found the following contributions to variability: extraction (72%) >> instrumental variance (16%) > instrumental stability (8.4%) > digestion (3.1%). Furthermore, the stability of the platform and its suitability for discovery proteomics studies is demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23495885      PMCID: PMC3695475          DOI: 10.1021/pr301146m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  67 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The generating function of CID, ETD, and CID/ETD pairs of tandem mass spectra: applications to database search.

Authors:  Sangtae Kim; Nikolai Mischerikow; Nuno Bandeira; J Daniel Navarro; Louis Wich; Shabaz Mohammed; Albert J R Heck; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy.

Authors:  Bruno Domon; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Derivatization or not: a choice in quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Xudong Yao
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Evaluation of nonionic and zwitterionic detergents as membrane protein solubilizers in two-dimensional electrophoresis.

Authors:  Sylvie Luche; Véronique Santoni; Thierry Rabilloud
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Label-free quantitative LC-MS proteomics of Alzheimer's disease and normally aged human brains.

Authors:  Victor P Andreev; Vladislav A Petyuk; Heather M Brewer; Yuliya V Karpievitch; Fang Xie; Jennifer Clarke; David Camp; Richard D Smith; Andrew P Lieberman; Roger L Albin; Zafar Nawaz; Jimmy El Hokayem; Amanda J Myers
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Proteomics analysis of human coronary atherosclerotic plaque: a feasibility study of direct tissue proteomics by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Carolina Bagnato; Jaykumar Thumar; Viveka Mayya; Sun-Il Hwang; Henry Zebroski; Kevin P Claffey; Christian Haudenschild; Jimmy K Eng; Deborah H Lundgren; David K Han
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Simple sodium dodecyl sulfate-assisted sample preparation method for LC-MS-based proteomics applications.

Authors:  Jian-Ying Zhou; Geoffrey P Dann; Tujin Shi; Lu Wang; Xiaoli Gao; Dian Su; Carrie D Nicora; Anil K Shukla; Ronald J Moore; Tao Liu; David G Camp; Richard D Smith; Wei-Jun Qian
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 10.  Mass spectrometry-based label-free quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Wenhong Zhu; Jeffrey W Smith; Chun-Ming Huang
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2009-11-10
View more
  55 in total

1.  Protein Mobility Shifts Contribute to Gel Electrophoresis Liquid Chromatography Analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Carruthers; Graham C Parker; Theresa Gratsch; Joseph A Caruso; Paul M Stemmer
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2015-09

2.  New frontiers for mass spectrometry based upon structures for lossless ion manipulations.

Authors:  Yehia M Ibrahim; Ahmed M Hamid; Liulin Deng; Sandilya V B Garimella; Ian K Webb; Erin S Baker; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.616

3.  Quantification of extracellular matrix proteins from a rat lung scaffold to provide a molecular readout for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Ryan C Hill; Elizabeth A Calle; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Laura E Niklason; Kirk C Hansen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics: An Overview.

Authors:  Svitlana Rozanova; Katalin Barkovits; Miroslav Nikolov; Carla Schmidt; Henning Urlaub; Katrin Marcus
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  Up-regulation of collagen proteins in colorectal liver metastasis compared with normal liver tissue.

Authors:  Nick A van Huizen; Robert R J Coebergh van den Braak; Michael Doukas; Lennard J M Dekker; Jan N M IJzermans; Theo M Luider
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Learning and Imputation for Mass-spec Bias Reduction (LIMBR).

Authors:  Alexander M Crowell; Casey S Greene; Jennifer J Loros; Jay C Dunlap
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Label-free quantification in ion mobility-enhanced data-independent acquisition proteomics.

Authors:  Ute Distler; Jörg Kuharev; Pedro Navarro; Stefan Tenzer
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 8.  Extracellular matrix proteomics in schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Manveen K Sethi; Joseph Zaia
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 9.  Critical Issues and Optimized Practices in Quantification of Protein Abundance Level to Determine Interindividual Variability in DMET Proteins by LC-MS/MS Proteomics.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar Bhatt; Bhagwat Prasad
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  SNaPP: Simplified Nanoproteomics Platform for Reproducible Global Proteomic Analysis of Nanogram Protein Quantities.

Authors:  Eric L Huang; Paul D Piehowski; Daniel J Orton; Ronald J Moore; Wei-Jun Qian; Cameron P Casey; Xiaofei Sun; Sudhansu K Dey; Kristin E Burnum-Johnson; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.736

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.