Literature DB >> 10997043

Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds.

J R Mounts1.   

Abstract

Four experiments explored inhibitory mechanisms related to attentional selection. Observers viewed multielement displays and performed a form discrimination task involving a probe element. Also present in the stimulus display was a singleton element (possessing a unique color or orientation). In Experiments 1-3, probe discrimination performance was measured as a function of the distance between the probe and the singleton. Experiment 1 revealed that probe discriminations suffered when the probe was adjacent to the singleton, but improved as the spatial separation between the probe and attentionally salient singleton increased. Experiment 2 added a control condition, revealing that probe discriminations were inhibited near the singleton, but returned to control level performance with increased separation. Further, the amount of inhibition increased with larger stimulus onset asynchronies between the singleton and probe. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the extent of the inhibitory region is spatially mediated. In Experiment 4, the task was modified to one of probe detection. No inhibition was observed in the detection task, indicating that the decrease in probe discrimination performance observed in Experiments 1-3 was not due to observers' inability to detect the probe element.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10997043     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  35 in total

1.  Attentional capture modulates perceptual sensitivity.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Arthur F Kramer; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

Review 2.  Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues.

Authors:  Robert Rauschenberger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

3.  Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula.

Authors:  Lihui Wang; Hongbo Yu; Jie Hu; Jan Theeuwes; Xiaoliang Gong; Yang Xiang; Changjun Jiang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision.

Authors:  J-M Hopf; C N Boehler; S J Luck; J K Tsotsos; H-J Heinze; M A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Nonspatial attributes of stimuli can influence spatial limitations of attentional control.

Authors:  Cathleen M Moore; Lyndsey K Lanagan-Leitzel; Peggy Chen; Rose Halterman; Elisabeth M Fine
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-04

6.  Localized attentional interference reflects competition for reentrant processing.

Authors:  Kelly S Steelman-Allen; Jason S McCarley; Jeffrey R W Mounts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

7.  Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of selective attention.

Authors:  John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Cortical and subcortical predictive dynamics and learning during perception, cognition, emotion and action.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Jianguo Lü; Hermann J Müller; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.