Literature DB >> 17668250

History of the development of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.

Tetsuya Tamaki1, Seiji Kubota.   

Abstract

In the early 1970s, spinal instrumentation and aggressive surgical technology came into wide use for the treatment of severe spinal deformities. This background led to the development of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring by orthopaedic spine surgeons themselves. The author's group (T.T.) and Kurokawa's group invented a technology in 1972 to utilize the spinal cord evoked potential (SCEP) after direct stimulation of the spinal cord. In the United States, Nash and his group started to use SEPs. Following these developments, the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital group of Stanmore, UK employed spinal somatosensory evoked potential in 1983. However, all of these methods were used to monitor sensory mediated tracts in the spinal cord. The only way to monitor motor function was the Wake up test developed by Vauzelle and Stagnara. In 1980, Merton and Morton reported a technology to stimulate the brain transcranially and opened the doors for motor tract monitoring. Presently, in the operating theatre, monitoring of motor-related functions is routinely performed. We have to remember that multidisciplinary support owing to the development of hardware and, software and the evolution of anesthesiology has made this possible. Furthermore, no single method can sufficiently cover the complex functions of the spinal cord. Multimodality combinations of the available technologies are considered necessary for practical and effective intra-operative monitoring (IOM). In this article, the most notable historic events and articles that are regarded as milestones in the development of IOM are reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17668250      PMCID: PMC2072901          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0416-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  31 in total

1.  Motor potentials evoked by paired cortical stimuli.

Authors:  M Inghilleri; A Berardelli; G Cruccu; A Priori; M Manfredi
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

2.  Spinal cord monitoring. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey.

Authors:  E G Dawson; J E Sherman; L E Kanim; M R Nuwer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  A method of monitoring function in corticospinal pathways during scoliosis surgery with a note on motor conduction velocities.

Authors:  S G Boyd; J C Rothwell; J M Cowan; P J Webb; T Morley; P Asselman; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery: responses of distal limb muscles to transcranial cortical stimulation with pulse trains.

Authors:  S J Jones; R Harrison; K F Koh; N Mendoza; H A Crockard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09

5.  Temporal summation--the key to motor evoked potential spinal cord monitoring in humans.

Authors:  B A Taylor; M E Fennelly; A Taylor; J Farrell
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description.

Authors:  M Taniguchi; C Cedzich; J Schramm
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  A new method of multisegment motor pathway monitoring using muscle potentials after train spinal stimulation.

Authors:  K Mochida; K Shinomiya; H Komori; K Furuya
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Comparison of evoked spinal potentials by stimulation of the sciatic nerve and the spinal cord.

Authors:  K Satomi; G I Nishimoto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Noninvasive intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials under propofol anesthesia: effects of spinal surgery on the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  D Jellinek; D Jewkes; L Symon
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Spinal cord evoked potential monitoring after spinal cord stimulation during surgery of spinal cord tumors.

Authors:  I Koyanagi; Y Iwasaki; T Isu; H Abe; M Akino; S Kuroda
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  20 in total

1.  Intraoperative spinal cord and nerve root monitoring: a survey of Canadian spine surgeons.

Authors:  Lissa Peeling; Stephen Hentschel; Richard Fox; Hamilton Hall; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Jong-Hwa Park; Seung-Jae Hyun
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 3.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Is intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring valuable predicting postoperative neurological recovery?

Authors:  Y J Rho; S C Rhim; J K Kang
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  The impact and value of uni- and multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) on neurological complications during spine surgery: a prospective study of 2728 patients.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Frank Kleinstueck; Tamàs F Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; François Porchet; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Intraoperative neurophysiology of the motor system in children: a tailored approach.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Paolo Manganotti; Stefan Grossauer; Vincenzo Tramontanto; Carlo Mazza; Massimo Gerosa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  A multi-train electrical stimulation protocol facilitates transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials and increases induction rate and reproducibility even in patients with preoperative neurological deficits.

Authors:  Shuta Ushio; Shigenori Kawabata; Satoshi Sumiya; Tsuyoshi Kato; Toshitaka Yoshii; Tsuyoshi Yamada; Mitsuhiro Enomoto; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 8.  Somatosensory evoked potential loss due to intraoperative pulse lavage during spine surgery: case report and review of signal change management.

Authors:  Arun George; Hironobu Hayashi; John F Bebawy; Antoun Koht
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  History of spinal osteotomy.

Authors:  Dennis S Meredith; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-01-04

10.  Technological innovation in neurosurgery: a quantitative study.

Authors:  Hani J Marcus; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Richard M Kwasnicki; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang; Dipankar Nandi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.115

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.