Literature DB >> 1785088

Spinal cord monitoring. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey.

E G Dawson1, J E Sherman, L E Kanim, M R Nuwer.   

Abstract

The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) and the European Spinal Deformity Society (ESDS) membership was surveyed regarding the use of intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials in spinal surgery. A total of 242 people responded, with 188 using intraoperative monitoring. A second survey was distributed detailing the technical aspects of monitoring, of which 71 were returned. A total of 342 neurologic deficits were reported to have occurred with monitoring in place. Two hundred forty-six (72%) were accurately detected, and 96 (28%) were not detected by sensory cord evoked potentials (SCEP). There were 1,003 false-positive cases reported. The incidence of false-negative cases was related to those not monitoring both latency and amplitude, to using fewer recording electrodes, and with those surgeons doing more kyphosis corrections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1785088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

Review 1.  False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports.

Authors:  H Wiedemayer; I E Sandalcioglu; W Armbruster; J Regel; H Schaefer; D Stolke
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Intraoperative spinal cord and nerve root monitoring: a survey of Canadian spine surgeons.

Authors:  Lissa Peeling; Stephen Hentschel; Richard Fox; Hamilton Hall; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Cost effectiveness of multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Jiri Dvorak; Franco Faccioli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  History of the development of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tamaki; Seiji Kubota
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Risk factors for positioning-related somatosensory evoked potential changes in 3946 spinal surgeries.

Authors:  Samyuktha R Melachuri; Jeffrey R Balzer; Manasa K Melachuri; David Ninaci; Katherine Anetakis; Jaspreet Kaur; Donald J Crammond; Parthasarathy D Thirumala
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Elevated preoperative blood pressure predicts the intraoperative loss of SSEP neuromonitoring signals during spinal surgery.

Authors:  Akash Kumar; Yuangen Chen; Hung-Mo Lin; Stacie Deiner
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during complex spinal deformity cases in pediatric patients: methodology, utility, prognostication, and outcome.

Authors:  James Drake; Reinhard Zeller; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Samuel Strantzas; Laura Holmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Common surgical complications in degenerative spinal surgery.

Authors:  Michael Papadakis; Lianou Aggeliki; Elias C Papadopoulos; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18

9.  Monitoring rate and predictability of intraoperative monitoring in patients with intradural extramedullary and epidural metastatic spinal tumors.

Authors:  H Kang; H S Gwak; S H Shin; M K Woo; I H Jeong; H Yoo; J W Kwon; S H Lee
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  Somatosensory Evoked Potentials suppression due to remifentanil during spinal operations; a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Irene Asouhidou; Vasilios Katsaridis; Georgios Vaidis; Polimnia Ioannou; Panagiotis Givissis; Anastasios Christodoulou; Georgios Georgiadis
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.