Literature DB >> 26380823

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery.

Jong-Hwa Park1, Seung-Jae Hyun1.   

Abstract

Recently, many surgeons have been using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) in spinal surgery to reduce the incidence of postoperative neurological complications, including level of the spinal cord, cauda equina and nerve root. Several established technologies are available and combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials are considered mandatory for practical and successful IOM. Spinal cord evoked potentials are elicited compound potentials recorded over the spinal cord. Electrical stimulation is provoked on the dorsal spinal cord from an epidural electrode. Somatosensory evoked potentials assess the functional integrity of sensory pathways from the peripheral nerve through the dorsal column and to the sensory cortex. For identification of the physiological midline, the dorsal column mapping technique can be used. It is helpful for reducing the postoperative morbidity associated with dorsal column dysfunction when distortion of the normal spinal cord anatomy caused by an intramedullary cord lesion results in confusion in localizing the midline for the myelotomy. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) consist of spinal, neurogenic and muscle MEPs. MEPs allow selective and specific assessment of the functional integrity of descending motor pathways, from the motor cortex to peripheral muscles. Spinal surgeons should understand the concept of the monitoring techniques and interpret monitoring records adequately to use IOM for the decision making during the surgery for safe surgery and a favorable surgical outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct wave; Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring; Motor-evoked potentials; Somatosensory-evoked potentials; Spinal surgery

Year:  2015        PMID: 26380823      PMCID: PMC4568525          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i9.765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


  32 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord monitoring.

Authors:  M R Nuwer
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Combined spinal cord monitoring using neurogenic mixed evoked potentials and collision techniques.

Authors:  Yann Péréon; Sylvie Nguyen The Tich; Joël Delécrin; Charles Pham Dang; Joël Bodin; Jean-Christophe Drouet; Norbert Passuti
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Highlights of anesthetic considerations for intraoperative neuromonitoring.

Authors:  Stacie Deiner
Journal:  Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2010-03

4.  Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in 17 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Seung-Chul Rhim
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 5.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: a review.

Authors:  Andres A Gonzalez; Dhiraj Jeyanandarajan; Chris Hansen; Gabriel Zada; Patrick C Hsieh
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Sensitivity and specificity of somatosensory and neurogenic-motor evoked potentials in animals and humans.

Authors:  J H Owen; J Laschinger; K Bridwell; S Shimon; C Nielsen; J Dunlap; C Kain
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The benefit of neurogenic mixed evoked potentials for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring during correction of severe scoliosis: a case study.

Authors:  Tracy J Wilson-Holden; David VanSickle; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of the motor pathways.

Authors:  V Deletis
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1993

9.  Motor-evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in a series of 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  K F Kothbauer; V Deletis; F J Epstein
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 4.047

10.  Utility of neurophysiological monitoring using dorsal column mapping in intramedullary spinal cord surgery.

Authors:  Daniel S Yanni; Sedat Ulkatan; Vedran Deletis; Ignacio J Barrenechea; Chandranath Sen; Noel I Perin
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-06
View more
  11 in total

1.  One-stage posterior focus debridement, interbody grafts, and posterior instrumentation and fusion in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis with kyphosis in children: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Yu-Xiang Wang; Hong-Qi Zhang; Ming-Xing Tang; Chao-Feng Guo; Ang Deng; Jian-Huang Wu; Jin-Yang Liu; Zhansheng Deng; Jing Chen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Afferent input and sensory function after human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Recep A Ozdemir; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Use of postoperative neurophysiological testing to help guide management in a case of delayed neurological injury.

Authors:  Srinivasa Prasad V Kanuparthi; Joshua M Pahys; Amer F Samdani; Jamila Grace; Steven W Hwang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Preoperative MRI and Intraoperative Monitoring Differentially Prevent Neurological Sequelae in Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgical Correction, While Curves >70 Degrees Increase the Risk of Neurophysiological Incidences.

Authors:  Konstantinos Pazarlis; Håkan Jonsson; Thomas Karlsson; Nikos Schizas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  The utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring on simple posterior lumbar fusions-analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Ryan J Austerman; Suraj Sulhan; William J Steele; Saeed S Sadrameli; Paul J Holman; Sean M Barber
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-06

6.  Achieving Value in Spine Surgery: 10 Major Cost Contributors.

Authors:  Lucas R Philipp; Adam Leibold; Aria Mahtabfar; Thiago S Montenegro; Glenn A Gonzalez; James S Harrop
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-04

7.  Pedicle screw position changing policy for nerve injury problems during screw insertion on thoracolumbar compression fractures.

Authors:  Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim; Ifran Saleh; M Fajrin Armin; Tri Kurniawati; Ahmad Yanuar Safri
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-09-23

8.  Somatosensory and transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring in a porcine model for experimental procedures.

Authors:  Sven Maier; Ulrich Goebel; Sonja Krause; Christoph Benk; Martin A Schick; Hartmut Buerkle; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Fabian A Kari; Jakob Wollborn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The effect of positive changes during intraoperative monitoring of the functional improvement in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  Min Kyu Park; Sook Joung Lee; Sang Beom Kim; Kyeong Woo Lee; Hye-Jeong Lee; Eun Young Han; Bo Ryun Kim
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  A Retrospective Study of Surgical Correction for Spinal Deformity with and without Osteotomy to Compare Outcome Using Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring with Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Jing-Fan Yang; Yao-Long Deng; Xie-Xiang Shao; Zi-Fang Huang; Jun-Lin Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.