Literature DB >> 8413877

Spinal cord evoked potential monitoring after spinal cord stimulation during surgery of spinal cord tumors.

I Koyanagi1, Y Iwasaki, T Isu, H Abe, M Akino, S Kuroda.   

Abstract

Spinal cord evoked potentials (SCEPs) after spinal cord stimulation were used as a method of spinal cord monitoring during surgery of 6 extramedullary and 14 intramedullary spinal cord tumors. SCEPs were recorded from an epidural electrode placed rostral to the level of the tumor. Electrical stimulation was applied on the dorsal spinal cord from a caudally placed epidural electrode. The wave forms of SCEPs consisted of a sharp negative peak (N1) in 15 cases and two negative peaks (N1 and N2) in 5 cases. The N2 wave was markedly attenuated by posterior midline myelotomy, whereas the N1 activity showed less-remarkable changes by myelotomy. An increase in N1 amplitude was observed after the removal of the tumor in four extramedullary and three intramedullary cases. Of six patients that showed decreased N1 amplitude after the removal of the tumor, five patients developed postoperative motor deficits. However, there were four false-negative cases and one false-positive case in regard to changes of N1 amplitude and postoperative motor deficits. Four false results occurred in intramedullary cases. In two of them, postoperative symptoms indicated intraoperative unilateral damage to the spinal cord. The position of the stimulating electrode, the difference in thresholds of the axons for electrical stimulation between the right and left side of the spinal cord, or the change of the distance between the electrode and the spinal cord surface may account for these false results. Thus, our analysis of the changes of SCEP wave forms and early postoperative symptoms indicates that the sensitivity of this monitoring method to detect intraoperative insults to the spinal cord is unsatisfactory in spite of the reproducible wave forms. We conclude that SCEP monitoring can be used as an alternative method or in combination with other types of evoked potentials in patients with severe spinal cord lesions who show abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials preoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8413877     DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199309000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  5 in total

1.  Prevention of spinal cord injury with time-frequency analysis of evoked potentials: an experimental study.

Authors:  Y Hu; K D Luk; W W Lu; A Holmes; J C Leong
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  History of the development of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tamaki; Seiji Kubota
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Surgery of intramedullary spinal cord tumors.

Authors:  M Zileli; E Coşkun; N Ozdamar; I Ovül; E Tunçbay; K Oner; N Oktar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Prediction of Post-operative Long-Term Outcome of the Motor Function by Multimodal Intraoperative Neuromonitoring With Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential and Spinal Cord-Evoked Potential After Microsurgical Resection for Spinal Cord Tumors.

Authors:  Shinsuke Yamada; Satoshi Kawajiri; Hidetaka Arishma; Makoto Isozaki; Takahiro Yamauchi; Ayumi Akazawa; Masamune Kidoguchi; Toshiaki Kodera; Yoshinori Shibaike; Hideto Umeda; Yu Tsukinowa; Ryota Hagihara; Kenichiro Kikuta
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-04

Review 5.  Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring: Focusing on the Basic Knowledge of Orthopedic Spine Surgeon and Neurosurgeon as Members of a Team Performing Spine Surgery under Neuromonitoring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tamaki; Muneharu Ando; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Shunji Tsutsui; Masanari Takami; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.