Literature DB >> 11818623

Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques.

John M Boone1, J Anthony Seibert, Cha-Mei Tang, Steve M Lane.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a comprehensive array of scatter cleanup techniques in mammography by using a consistent methodology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monte Carlo techniques were used to evaluate the Bucky factor (BF) and the contrast improvement factor (CIF) for linear and cellular grids and for slot scan and scanning multiple-slot assembly (SMSA) systems.
RESULTS: For a 28-kVp molybdenum anode-molybdenum filter spectrum with a standard detector and a 6-cm-thick 50% adipose-50% glandular breast phantom, slot scan techniques delivered an ideal BF. For slot widths greater than 4 mm, however, the CIF was lower than that achieved by the high-transmission cellular grid with a grid ratio of 3.8:1. A tungsten-septa air-interspaced cellular grid with a 4:1 grid ratio outperformed the high-transmission cellular grid in both BF and CIF. The SMSA was shown to be efficacious when 4-mm-wide slots were separated by at least 20 mm. In comparison with the literature, 3.6% agreement was achieved with other Monte Carlo studies, 3.3% with an experimental study that used a digital detector, and 13%-29% agreement was demonstrated in comparison to film-based experimental studies.
CONCLUSION: With use of consistent methods for comparison, cellular grids were shown to substantially outperform linear grids but have slightly higher BFs compared with that of slot scan geometries at the same CIF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11818623     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2222010491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

1.  Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography.

Authors:  Felix Diekmann; Ulrich Bick
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The effect of scatter and glare on image quality in contrast-enhanced breast imaging using an a-Si/CsI(TI) full-field flat panel detector.

Authors:  Ann-Katherine Carton; Raymond Acciavatti; Johnny Kuo; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Comparison of slot scanning digital mammography system with full-field digital mammography system.

Authors:  Chao-Jen Lai; Chris C Shaw; William Geiser; Lingyun Chen; Elsa Arribas; Tanya Stephens; Paul L Davis; Geetha P Ayyar; Basak E Dogan; Victoria A Nguyen; Gary J Whitman; Wei T Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  On image quality metrics and the usefulness of grids in digital mammography.

Authors:  Han Chen; Mats Danielsson; Cheng Xu; Björn Cederström
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-02-17

6.  Evaluation of scatter effects on image quality for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Gang Wu; James G Mainprize; John M Boone; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Scatter correction method for x-ray CT using primary modulation: phantom studies.

Authors:  Hewei Gao; Rebecca Fahrig; N Robert Bennett; Mingshan Sun; Josh Star-Lack; Lei Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Investigation of optimum anti-scatter grid selection for digital radiography: physical imaging properties and detectability of low-contrast signals.

Authors:  Nobukazu Tanaka; Kentaro Naka; Aya Saito; Junji Morishita; Fukai Toyofuku; Masafumi Ohki; Yoshiharu Higashida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-08-08

9.  Design and evaluation of a grid reciprocation scheme for use in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tushita Patel; Helen Sporkin; Heather Peppard; Mark B Williams
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-29

Review 10.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.