Literature DB >> 22218075

Improving the performance of computer-aided detection of subtle breast masses using an adaptive cueing method.

Xingwei Wang1, Lihua Li, Weidong Xu, Wei Liu, Dror Lederman, Bin Zheng.   

Abstract

Current computer-aided detection (CAD) schemes for detecting mammographic masses have several limitations including high correlation with radiologists' detection and cueing most subtle masses only on one view. To increase CAD sensitivity in cueing more subtle masses that are likely missed and/or overlooked by radiologists without increasing false-positive rates, we investigated a new case-dependent cueing method by combining the original CAD-generated detection scores with a computed bilateral mammographic density asymmetry index. Using the new method, we adaptively raise the CAD-generated scores of the regions detected on 'high-risk' cases to cue more subtle mass regions and reduce the CAD scores of the regions detected on 'low-risk' cases to discard more false-positive regions. A testing dataset involving 78 positive and 338 negative cases was used to test this adaptive cueing method. Each positive case involves two sequential examinations in which the mass was detected in 'current' examination and missed in 'prior' examination but detected in a retrospective review by radiologists. Applying to this dataset, a pre-optimized CAD scheme yielded 75% case-based and 55% region-based sensitivity on 'current' examinations at a false-positive rate of 0.25 per image. CAD sensitivity was reduced to 42% (case based) and 27% (region based) on 'prior' examinations. Using the new cueing method, case-based and region-based sensitivity could maximally increase 9% and 33% on the 'prior' examinations, respectively. The percentages of the masses cued on two views also increased from 27% to 65%. The study demonstrated that using this adaptive cueing method enabled us to help CAD cue more subtle cancers without increasing the false-positive cueing rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22218075      PMCID: PMC3310913          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/2/561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  33 in total

1.  Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; Gordon S Abrams; Amy H Lu; Luisa P Wallace; Glenn S Maitz; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Computerized prediction of risk for developing breast cancer based on bilateral mammographic breast tissue asymmetry.

Authors:  Xingwei Wang; Dror Lederman; Jun Tan; Xiao Hui Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Durado Brooks; Debbie Saslow; Mona Shah; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: a performance assessment.

Authors:  B Zheng; J H Sumkin; M L Zuley; D Lederman; X Wang; D Gur
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Melissa L Anderson; Sebastien J P A Haneuse; Edward A Sickles; Robert A Smith; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Robert D Rosenberg; Berta M Geller; Tracy L Onega; Barbara S Monsees; Lawrence W Bassett; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Joann G Elmore; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center.

Authors:  T W Freer; M J Ulissey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Computer-aided detection; the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Xingwei Wang; Dror Lederman; Jun Tan; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Linn Abraham; Stephen H Taplin; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Carl D'Orsi; Joann G Elmore; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Yi-Ta Wu; Chuan Zhou; Mark A Helvie; Alexander Tsodikov; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality.

Authors:  L Tabár; B Vitak; H H Chen; M F Yen; S W Duffy; R A Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  5 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI images using bilateral asymmetry of contrast enhancement between two breasts.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Lihua Li; Juan Zhang; Guoliang Shao; Chengjie Zhang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Reduction of false-positive recalls using a computerized mammographic image feature analysis scheme.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Faranak Aghaei; Yunzhi Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A new approach to develop computer-aided detection schemes of digital mammograms.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Wei Qian; Jiantao Pu; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Developing a Quantitative Ultrasound Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Assess Tumor Treatment Efficacy Using a Mouse Model.

Authors:  Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Joshua VanOsdol; Morteza Heidari; Gopichandh Danala; Sri Nandhini Sethuraman; Ashish Ranjan; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.