Literature DB >> 22806627

Mammographic image denoising and enhancement using the Anscombe transformation, adaptive wiener filtering, and the modulation transfer function.

Larissa C S Romualdo1, Marcelo A C Vieira, Homero Schiabel, Nelson D A Mascarenhas, Lucas R Borges.   

Abstract

A new restoration methodology is proposed to enhance mammographic images through the improvement of contrast features and the simultaneous suppression of noise. Denoising is performed in the first step using the Anscombe transformation to convert the signal-dependent quantum noise into an approximately signal-independent Gaussian additive noise. In the Anscombe domain, noise is filtered through an adaptive Wiener filter, whose parameters are obtained by considering local image statistics. In the second step, a filter based on the modulation transfer function of the imaging system in the whole radiation field is applied for image enhancement. This methodology can be used as a preprocessing module for computer-aided detection (CAD) systems to improve the performance of breast cancer screening. A preliminary assessment of the restoration algorithm was performed using synthetic images with different levels of quantum noise. Afterward, we evaluated the effect of the preprocessing on the performance of a previously developed CAD system for clustered microcalcification detection in mammographic images. The results from the synthetic images showed an increase of up to 11.5 dB (p = 0.002) in the peak signal-to-noise ratio. Moreover, the mean structural similarity index increased up to 8.3 % (p < 0.001). Regarding CAD performance, the results suggested that the preprocessing increased the detectability of microcalcifications in mammographic images without increasing the false-positive rates. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an average increase of 14.1 % (p = 0.01) in overall CAD performance when restored image sets were used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22806627      PMCID: PMC3597965          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9507-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  32 in total

1.  Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities.

Authors:  W T Ho; P W T Lam
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.

Authors:  R L Birdwell; D M Ikeda; K F O'Shaughnessy; E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Contrast enhancement in dense breast images using the modulation transfer function.

Authors:  Fátima L S Nunes; Homero Schiabel; Rodrigo H Benatti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors.

Authors:  Xiujiang J Rong; Kerry T Krugh; S Jeff Shepard; William R Geiser
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Evaluation of microcalcifications segmentation techniques for dense breast digitized images.

Authors:  Claudio Eduardo Góes; Homero Schiabel; Fátima L S Nunes
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  Breast cancer risk reduction: strategies for women at increased risk.

Authors:  Rowan T Chlebowski
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 13.739

7.  False positive marks on unsuspicious screening mammography with computer-aided detection.

Authors:  Mary C Mahoney; Karthikeyan Meganathan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center.

Authors:  T W Freer; M J Ulissey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.

Authors:  Elodia B Cole; Etta D Pisano; Emily O Kistner; Keith E Muller; Marylee E Brown; Stephen A Feig; Roberta A Jong; Andrew D A Maidment; Melinda J Staiger; Cherie M Kuzmiak; Rita I Freimanis; Nadine Lesko; Eric L Rosen; Ruth Walsh; Margaret Williford; M Patricia Braeuning
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Connie Y Nakano; Thomas D Koepsell; Laurel M Desnick; Carl J D'Orsi; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  3 in total

1.  A modified undecimated discrete wavelet transform based approach to mammographic image denoising.

Authors:  Eri Matsuyama; Du-Yih Tsai; Yongbum Lee; Masaki Tsurumaki; Noriyuki Takahashi; Haruyuki Watanabe; Hsian-Min Chen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A new approach for clustered MCs classification with sparse features learning and TWSVM.

Authors:  Xin-Sheng Zhang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-09

3.  Method for simulating dose reduction in digital mammography using the Anscombe transformation.

Authors:  Lucas R Borges; Helder C R de Oliveira; Polyana F Nunes; Predrag R Bakic; Andrew D A Maidment; Marcelo A C Vieira
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.