Literature DB >> 17653784

An augmented reality simulator for ultrasound guided needle placement training.

D Magee1, Y Zhu, R Ratnalingam, P Gardner, D Kessel.   

Abstract

Details are presented of a low cost augmented-reality system for the simulation of ultrasound guided needle insertion procedures (tissue biopsy, abscess drainage, nephrostomy etc.) for interventional radiology education and training. The system comprises physical elements; a mannequin, a mock ultrasound probe and a needle, and software elements; generating virtual ultrasound anatomy and allowing data collection. These two elements are linked by a pair of magnetic 3D position sensors. Virtual anatomic images are generated based on anatomic data derived from full body CT scans of live humans. Details of the novel aspects of this system are presented including; image generation, registration and calibration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17653784     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-007-0231-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  11 in total

1.  Real-time interactive simulator for percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures.

Authors:  Y Wang; C Chui; H Lim; Y Cai; K Mak
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  1998

2.  The learning curve and sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  L Tafra
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Face-, expert, and referent validity of the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Computer-based training in two-dimensional echocardiography using an echocardiography simulator.

Authors:  Michael Weidenbach; Florentine Wild; Kathrin Scheer; Gerhard Muth; Stefan Kreutter; Gernoth Grunst; Thomas Berlage; Peter Schneider
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  Simulation devices in interventional radiology: caveat emptor.

Authors:  Derek A Gould; Jim A Reekers; David O Kessel; Nick C Chalmers; Marc Sapoval; Aalpen A Patel; Gary J Becker; Mick J Lee; Luc Stockx
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Simulators in catheter-based interventional radiology: training or computer games?

Authors:  D A Gould; D O Kessel; A E Healey; S J Johnson; W E Lewandowski
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 9.  Procedural simulation: a primer.

Authors:  Steven Dawson
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 10.  Virtual reality and simulation: training the future emergency physician.

Authors:  Martin Reznek; Phillip Harter; Thomas Krummel
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.451

View more
  11 in total

1.  Using simulation for interventional radiology training.

Authors:  D Gould
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Ultrasound-guided facet joint injection training using Perk Tutor.

Authors:  E Moult; T Ungi; M Welch; J Lu; R C McGraw; G Fichtinger
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Multi-ray medical ultrasound simulation without explicit speckle modelling.

Authors:  Mert Tuzer; Abdulkadir Yazıcı; Rüştü Türkay; Michael Boyman; Burak Acar
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Interventional radiology virtual simulator for liver biopsy.

Authors:  P F Villard; F P Vidal; L ap Cenydd; R Holbrey; S Pisharody; S Johnson; A Bulpitt; N W John; F Bello; D Gould
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  IMPROVING MEDICAL EDUCATION: SIMULATING CHANGES IN PATIENT ANATOMY USING DYNAMIC HAPTIC FEEDBACK.

Authors:  Mary Yovanoff; David Pepley; Katelin Mirkin; Jason Moore; David Han; Scarlett Miller
Journal:  Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet       Date:  2016-09-15

6.  Open-source surface mesh-based ultrasound-guided spinal intervention simulator.

Authors:  Laura Bartha; Andras Lasso; Csaba Pinter; Tamas Ungi; Zsuzsanna Keri; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  On mixed reality environments for minimally invasive therapy guidance: systems architecture, successes and challenges in their implementation from laboratory to clinic.

Authors:  Cristian A Linte; Katherine P Davenport; Kevin Cleary; Craig Peters; Kirby G Vosburgh; Nassir Navab; Philip Eddie Edwards; Pierre Jannin; Terry M Peters; David R Holmes; Richard A Robb
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  Breast biopsy navigation system with an assisted needle holder tool and 2D graphical user interface.

Authors:  Jackrit Suthakorn; Narucha Tanaiutchawoot; Cholatip Wiratkapan; Songpol Ongwattanakul
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2018-07-18

Review 9.  Augmented Reality in Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Barbara Shipman; Brendan William Munzer; Mohammad Mairaj Khan; Prashant Mahajan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  Augmented reality in medical education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kevin S Tang; Derrick L Cheng; Eric Mi; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2020-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.