Literature DB >> 17650121

Deafness alters auditory nerve fibre responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

David J Sly1, Leon F Heffer, Mark W White, Robert K Shepherd, Michael G J Birch, Ricki L Minter, Niles E Nelson, Andrew K Wise, Stephen J O'Leary.   

Abstract

Here we characterized the relationship between duration of sensorineural hearing loss and the response of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulus rate. Electrophysiological recordings were made from undeafened guinea pigs and those ototoxically deafened for either 5 weeks or 6 months. Auditory neuron survival decreased significantly with the duration of deafness. Extracellular recordings were made from auditory nerve fibres responding to biphasic, charge-balanced current pulses delivered at rates of 20 and 200 pulses/s via a monopolar scala tympani stimulating electrode. The response to 20 pulses/s electrical stimulation of the deafened cochlea exhibited a decrease in spike latency, unaltered temporal jitter and unaltered dynamic range (of nerve firing rate against stimulus current), and a reduction in threshold after 6 months of deafness. The response to a 200-pulse/s stimulus was similar except that the dynamic range was greater than with 20 pulses/s and was also greater in deafened animals than in undeafened animals. Deafness and pulse rate are related; in deaf animals spike recovery appears to be complete between successive stimulus pulses at a low rate (20 pulses/s), but incomplete between pulses at a moderate pulse rate (200 pulses/s). These results suggest that changes in the function of individual auditory nerve fibres after deafness may affect clinical responses during high-rate stimulation such as that used in contemporary speech processing strategies, but not during lower rate stimulation such as that used to record evoked potentials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17650121      PMCID: PMC2112941          DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05678.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  32 in total

Review 1.  Molecular dissection of the myelinated axon.

Authors:  S G Waxman; J M Ritchie
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; E Javel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Threshold fluctuations in an N sodium channel model of the node of Ranvier.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Neural processes in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the anaesthetised cat investigated from unit responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  S J O'Leary; Y C Tong; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Intracochlear electrical stimulation of normal and deaf cats investigated using brainstem response audiometry.

Authors:  R C Black; G M Clark; S J O'Leary; C Walters
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1983

6.  Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.

Authors:  J Xu; R K Shepherd; R E Millard; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Cochlear pathology of long term neomycin induced deafness in cats.

Authors:  P A Leake; G T Hradek
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  R D Hall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J B Nadol; Y S Young; R J Glynn
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Horseradish peroxidase injection of physiologically characterized afferent and efferent neurones in the guinea pig spiral ganglion.

Authors:  D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  The convergence of cochlear implantation with induced pluripotent stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Niliksha Gunewardene; Mirella Dottori; Bryony A Nayagam
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; David J Sly; James B Fallon; Mark W White; Robert K Shepherd; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

5.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Threshold levels of dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jorien Snel-Bongers; Jeroen J Briaire; Erika H van der Veen; Randy K Kalkman; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-22

8.  Stem cell transplantation for auditory nerve replacement.

Authors:  Richard A Altschuler; K Sue O'Shea; Josef M Miller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Feline deafness.

Authors:  David K Ryugo; Marilyn Menotti-Raymond
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.093

10.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.