PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with symptomatic cardiac toxicity in patients with esophageal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 102 patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Our primary endpoint was symptomatic cardiac toxicity. Radiation dosimetry, patient demographic factors, and myocardial changes seen on (18)F-FDG PET were correlated with subsequent cardiac toxicity. Cardiac toxicity measured by RTOG and CTCAE v3.0 criteria was identified by chart review. RESULTS: During the follow up period, 12 patients were identified with treatment related cardiac toxicity, 6 of which were symptomatic. The mean heart V20 (79.7% vs. 67.2%, p=0.05), V30 (75.8% vs. 61.9%, p=0.04), and V40 (69.2% vs. 53.8%, p=0.03) were significantly higher in patients with symptomatic cardiac toxicity than those without. We found the threshold for symptomatic cardiac toxicity to be a V20, V30 and V40 above 70%, 65% and 60%, respectively. There was no correlation between change myocardial SUV on PET and cardiac toxicity, however, a greater proportion of women suffered symptomatic cardiac toxicity compared to men (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A correlation did not exist between percent change in myocardial SUV and cardiac toxicity. Patients with symptomatic cardiac toxicity received significantly greater mean V20, 30 and 40 values to the heart compared to asymptomatic patients. These data need validation in a larger independent data set.
PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with symptomatic cardiac toxicity in patients with esophageal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 102 patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Our primary endpoint was symptomatic cardiac toxicity. Radiation dosimetry, patient demographic factors, and myocardial changes seen on (18)F-FDG PET were correlated with subsequent cardiac toxicity. Cardiac toxicity measured by RTOG and CTCAE v3.0 criteria was identified by chart review. RESULTS: During the follow up period, 12 patients were identified with treatment related cardiac toxicity, 6 of which were symptomatic. The mean heart V20 (79.7% vs. 67.2%, p=0.05), V30 (75.8% vs. 61.9%, p=0.04), and V40 (69.2% vs. 53.8%, p=0.03) were significantly higher in patients with symptomatic cardiac toxicity than those without. We found the threshold for symptomatic cardiac toxicity to be a V20, V30 and V40 above 70%, 65% and 60%, respectively. There was no correlation between change myocardial SUV on PET and cardiac toxicity, however, a greater proportion of women suffered symptomatic cardiac toxicity compared to men (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A correlation did not exist between percent change in myocardial SUV and cardiac toxicity. Patients with symptomatic cardiac toxicity received significantly greater mean V20, 30 and 40 values to the heart compared to asymptomatic patients. These data need validation in a larger independent data set.
Authors: David Hong; Simon Lunagomez; E Edmund Kim; Jeffery H Lee; Robert S Bresalier; Stephen G Swisher; Tsung-Tse Wu; Jeffery Morris; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; Jaffer A Ajani Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A William Blackstock; Michael R Farmer; James Lovato; Girish Mishra; Susan A Melin; Timothy Oaks; Mabea Aklilu; Paige B Clark; Edward A Levine Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-10-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Shiva K Das; Alan H Baydush; Sumin Zhou; Moyed Miften; Xiaoli Yu; Oana Craciunescu; Mark Oldham; Kim Light; Terence Wong; Michael Blazing; Salvador Borges-Neto; Mark W Dewhirst; Lawrence B Marks Journal: Med Phys Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Shu-lian Wang; Zhongxing Liao; Ara A Vaporciyan; Susan L Tucker; Helen Liu; Xiong Wei; Stephen Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani; James D Cox; Ritsuko Komaki Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-10-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Andre Konski; Mohan Doss; Barton Milestone; Oleh Haluszka; Alexandra Hanlon; Gary Freedman; Lee Adler Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Trevor Leong; Craig Everitt; Kally Yuen; Sara Condron; Andrew Hui; Samuel Y K Ngan; Alexander Pitman; Eddie W F Lau; Michael MacManus; David Binns; Trevor Ackerly; Rodney J Hicks Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Edward A Levine; Michael R Farmer; Paige Clark; Girish Mishra; Coty Ho; Kim R Geisinger; Susan A Melin; James Lovato; Tim Oaks; A William Blackstock Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jacob S Witt; Justin C Jagodinsky; Yifei Liu; Poonam Yadav; Aleksandra Kuczmarska-Haas; Menggang Yu; James D Maloney; Mark A Ritter; Michael F Bassetti; Andrew M Baschnagel Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Liru He; Andrew Chapple; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; Peter F Thall; Steven H Lin Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2016-08-22 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Milan Vošmik; Miroslav Hodek; David Buka; Petra Sýkorová; Jakub Grepl; Petr Paluska; Simona Paulíková; Igor Sirák Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2020-02-25
Authors: Lisa Ni; Matthew Koshy; Philip Connell; Sean Pitroda; Daniel W Golden; Hania Al-Hallaq; Greg Hubert; Greg Kauffman; Anne McCall; Renuka Malik Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 2.895