Literature DB >> 29456850

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the prediction of survival in patients with advanced esophageal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Masahiko Yano1, Hiroshi Miyata1, Keijiro Sugimura1, Masaaki Motoori1, Takeshi Omori1, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara1, Norikatsu Miyoshi1, Masayoshi Yasui1, Masayuki Ohue1, Hirofumi Akita1, Akira Tomokuni1, Hidenori Takahashi1, Shogo Kobayashi1, Masato Sakon1.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising treatment strategy for advanced esophageal cancer. However, measures of NAC response assessment and prognostic prediction have not yet been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). A total of 77 patients with stage IB-IV esophageal cancer who were treated with NAC followed by curative resection were retrospectively analyzed. PET/CT was performed before and after NAC and 56 patients were clinical responders. The pretreatment maximal standardized uptake value (pre-SUVmax), post-SUVmax and %SUVmax were 11.3±5.8, 5.1±4.8 and 49.0±35.1%, respectively, for the main tumors (T) and 4.3±2.8, 2.5±1.9 and 67.0±39.6%, respectively, for the metastatic nodes (N). Among the preoperatively available factors, clinical response (P=0.018), post-SUVmax-N (P=0.0001) and %SUVmax-T (P=0.0031) were significant prognostic factors by univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis identified post-SUVmax-N as the only significant prognostic predictor (P=0.0254). Patients with a post-SUVmax-N of <3.0 exhibited significantly fewer pathological metastatic nodes and better disease-free survival compared with patients with a post-SUVmax-N >3.0. Therefore, post-SUVmax-N may be a useful prognostic predictor in patients with advanced esophageal cancer who are treated with NAC followed by surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophageal neoplasms; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Year:  2018        PMID: 29456850      PMCID: PMC5795578          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  38 in total

1.  The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.

Authors:  Nabil Rizk; Ennapadam Venkatraman; Bernard Park; Raja Flores; Manjit S Bains; Valerie Rusch
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Assessment of treatment response and recurrence in esophageal carcinoma based on tumor length and standardized uptake value on positron emission tomography-computed tomography.

Authors:  Johannes B Roedl; Mukesh G Harisinghani; Rivka R Colen; Alan J Fischman; Michael A Blake; Douglas J Mathisen; Peter R Mueller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging.

Authors:  W A Weber; K Ott; K Becker; H J Dittler; H Helmberger; N E Avril; G Meisetschläger; R Busch; J R Siewert; M Schwaiger; U Fink
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Akihiro Suzuki; Lianchun Xiao; Yuki Hayashi; Homer A Macapinlac; James Welsh; Steven H Lin; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Dipen M Maru; Wayne L Hofstetter; Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  P Flamen; A Lerut; E Van Cutsem; W De Wever; M Peeters; S Stroobants; P Dupont; G Bormans; M Hiele; P De Leyn; D Van Raemdonck; W Coosemans; N Ectors; K Haustermans; L Mortelmans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The number of lymph node metastases influences survival in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  K Kawahara; T Maekawa; K Okabayashi; T Shiraishi; Y Yoshinaga; S Yoneda; T Hideshima; T Shirakusa
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  H Akiyama; M Tsurumaru; H Udagawa; Y Kajiyama
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  18F-fluorodeoxiglucose positron emission tomography for the evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy response in esophageal cancer: systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Angel C Rebollo Aguirre; Carlos Ramos-Font; Román Villegas Portero; Gary J R Cook; José M Llamas Elvira; Antonio Romero Tabares
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Positron emission tomographic scanning predicts survival after induction chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Port; Paul C Lee; Robert J Korst; Yaakov Liss; Danish Meherally; Paul Christos; Madhu Mazumdar; Nasser K Altorki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Prognostic significance of the size of cancer nests in metastatic lymph nodes in human esophageal cancers.

Authors:  Takamichi Komori; Yuichiro Doki; Toshiyuki Kabuto; Osamu Ishikawa; Masahiro Hiratsuka; Yo Sasaki; Hiroaki Ohigashi; Kohei Murata; Terumasa Yamada; Isao Miyashiro; Masayuki Mano; Shingo Ishiguro; Shingi Imaoka
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.