Literature DB >> 17632210

Quo vadis source tracking? Towards a strategic framework for environmental monitoring of fecal pollution.

Jorge W Santo Domingo1, Dustin G Bambic, Thomas A Edge, Stefan Wuertz.   

Abstract

Advances in microbial source tracking (MST) have largely been driven by the need to comply with water quality standards based on traditional indicator bacteria. Recently, a number of culture-independent, and library-independent methods based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have been gaining popularity among source trackers. However, only a limited number of these methods have been successfully used in field applications, primarily due to the fact that many of them are still being developed. In this critical outlook, we examine different viewpoints associated with the practical use of MST to identify critical research gaps, propose a priority-based timeline to address them, and outline emerging technologies that will likely impact the future of source tracking. We propose that it is necessary to consider each of these aspects in order to advance towards a unifying framework in source identification, so that fecal pollution monitoring can be reliably used for comprehensive environmental microbial monitoring, to develop risk assessment models, and to implement and validate adequate management practices.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17632210     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  42 in total

1.  Blautia and Prevotella sequences distinguish human and animal fecal pollution in Brazil surface waters.

Authors:  Amber M Koskey; Jenny C Fisher; A Murat Eren; Rafael Ponce-Terashima; Mitermayer G Reis; Ronald E Blanton; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.541

2.  Association of fecal indicator bacteria with human viruses and microbial source tracking markers at coastal beaches impacted by nonpoint source pollution.

Authors:  Shannon McQuaig; John Griffith; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Application of Faecalibacterium 16S rDNA genetic marker for accurate identification of duck faeces.

Authors:  Da Sun; Chuanren Duan; Yaning Shang; Yunxia Ma; Lili Tan; Jun Zhai; Xu Gao; Jingsong Guo; Guixue Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Quantifying the Relative Contributions of Environmental Sources to the Microbial Community in an Urban Stream under Dry and Wet Weather Conditions.

Authors:  Darshan Baral; Allison Speicher; Bruce Dvorak; David Admiraal; Xu Li
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Temporal assessment of the impact of exposure to cow feces in two watersheds by multiple host-specific PCR assays.

Authors:  Yong-Jin Lee; Marirosa Molina; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Jonathan D Willis; Michael Cyterski; Dinku M Endale; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Microbial Source Tracking in Adjacent Karst Springs.

Authors:  Shoshanit Ohad; Dalit Vaizel-Ohayon; Meir Rom; Joseph Guttman; Diego Berger; Valeria Kravitz; Shlomo Pilo; Zohar Huberman; Yechezkel Kashi; Efrat Rorman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Distribution of human-specific bacteroidales and fecal indicator bacteria in an urban watershed impacted by sewage pollution, determined using RNA- and DNA-based quantitative PCR assays.

Authors:  Vikram Kapoor; Tarja Pitkänen; Hodon Ryu; Michael Elk; David Wendell; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Potential pathogen communities in highly polluted river ecosystems: Geographical distribution and environmental influence.

Authors:  Yuzhan Yang; Yang Hou; Min Ma; Aibin Zhan
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.129

9.  Tracking the primary sources of fecal pollution in a tropical watershed in a one-year study.

Authors:  Carlos Toledo-Hernandez; Hodon Ryu; Joel Gonzalez-Nieves; Evelyn Huertas; Gary A Toranzos; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Discrimination of viable and dead fecal Bacteroidales bacteria by quantitative PCR with propidium monoazide.

Authors:  Sungwoo Bae; Stefan Wuertz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.