Literature DB >> 26743644

Application of Faecalibacterium 16S rDNA genetic marker for accurate identification of duck faeces.

Da Sun1, Chuanren Duan2, Yaning Shang1, Yunxia Ma1, Lili Tan1, Jun Zhai3, Xu Gao3, Jingsong Guo4, Guixue Wang5.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to judge the legal duty of pollution liabilities by assessing a duck faeces-specific marker, which can exclude distractions of residual bacteria from earlier contamination accidents. With the gene sequencing technology and bioinformatics method, we completed the comparative analysis of Faecalibacterium sequences, which were associated with ducks and other animal species, and found the sequences unique to duck faeces. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and agarose gel electrophoresis techniques were used to verify the reliability of both human and duck faeces-specific primers. The duck faeces-specific primers generated an amplicon of 141 bp from 43.3 % of duck faecal samples, 0 % of control samples and 100 % of sewage wastewater samples that contained duck faeces. We present here the initial evidence of Faecalibacterium-based applicability as human faeces-specificity in China. Meanwhile, this study represents the initial report of a Faecalibacterium marker for duck faeces and suggests an independent or supplementary environmental biotechnology of microbial source tracking (MST).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Duck; Faecalibacterium; Host-specific PCR assay; Water pollution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26743644     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-6024-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  50 in total

1.  Differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from human, livestock, and poultry sources by rep-PCR DNA fingerprinting on the shellfish culture area of East China Sea.

Authors:  Hong-Jia Ma; Ling-Lin Fu; Jian-Rong Li
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Specificity of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron marker for human feces.

Authors:  C Andrew Carson; Jessica M Christiansen; Helen Yampara-Iquise; Verel W Benson; Claire Baffaut; Jerri V Davis; Robert R Broz; William B Kurtz; Wendi M Rogers; William H Fales
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Advantage of using inosine at the 3' termini of 16S rRNA gene universal primers for the study of microbial diversity.

Authors:  Eitan Ben-Dov; Orr H Shapiro; Nachshon Siboni; Ariel Kushmaro
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Performance, design, and analysis in microbial source tracking studies.

Authors:  Donald M Stoeckel; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Chicken- and duck-associated Bacteroides-Prevotella genetic markers for detecting fecal contamination in environmental water.

Authors:  Ayano Kobayashi; Daisuke Sano; Jun Hatori; Satoshi Ishii; Satoshi Okabe
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Discriminant analysis of ribotype profiles of Escherichia coli for differentiating human and nonhuman sources of fecal pollution.

Authors:  S Parveen; K M Portier; K Robinson; L Edmiston; M L Tamplin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Community structures of fecal bacteria in cattle from different animal feeding operations.

Authors:  Orin C Shanks; Catherine A Kelty; Shawn Archibeque; Michael Jenkins; Ryan J Newton; Sandra L McLellan; Susan M Huse; Mitchell L Sogin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Use of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron-specific alpha-1-6, mannanase quantitative PCR to detect human faecal pollution in water.

Authors:  H Yampara-Iquise; G Zheng; J E Jones; C Andrew Carson
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Sourcing faecal pollution: a combination of library-dependent and library-independent methods to identify human faecal pollution in non-sewered catchments.

Authors:  W Ahmed; J Stewart; T Gardner; D Powell; P Brooks; D Sullivan; N Tindale
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  Potential human pathogenic bacteria in a mixed urban watershed as revealed by pyrosequencing.

Authors:  A Mark Ibekwe; Menu Leddy; Shelton E Murinda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Potential application of an Aspergillus strain in a pilot biofilter for benzene biodegradation.

Authors:  Da Sun; Kun Zhang; Chuanren Duan; Wei Wu; Daiyong Deng; Donghong Yu; M Babar Shahzad; Dake Xu; Ju Tang; Li Luo; Jia Chen; Jinxuan Wang; Yidan Chen; Xiang Xie; Guixue Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Faecal pollution affects abundance and diversity of aquatic microbial community in anthropo-zoogenically influenced lotic ecosystems.

Authors:  Lisa Paruch; Adam M Paruch; Hans Geir Eiken; Roald Sørheim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Biogeography of microbiome and short-chain fatty acids in the gastrointestinal tract of duck.

Authors:  Hua Yang; Wentao Lyu; Lizhi Lu; Xingfen Shi; Na Li; Wen Wang; Yingping Xiao
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.352

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.