Literature DB >> 29858206

Quantifying the Relative Contributions of Environmental Sources to the Microbial Community in an Urban Stream under Dry and Wet Weather Conditions.

Darshan Baral1, Allison Speicher1, Bruce Dvorak1, David Admiraal1, Xu Li2.   

Abstract

Investigating sources of microbial contamination in urban streams, especially when there are no contributions from combined sewer overflows or sewage effluent discharges, can be challenging. The objectives of this study were to identify the sources of microbes in an urban stream and quantify their relative contributions to the microbial community in the stream under dry and wet weather conditions. A microbial source tracking method relying on the 16S rRNA gene was used to investigate the microbial communities in water samples of an urban stream (i.e., from 11 dry and 6 wet weather events), as well as in streambed sediment, soils, street sweepings, sanitary sewage, an upstream lake, and feces of animals and birds collected between 2013 and 2015. The results showed that the Escherichia coli levels in the stream were significantly higher in wet weather flow than in dry weather flow. The upstream lake contributed approximately 93% of the microbes in dry weather flows. Water discharged from storm drain outfalls was the biggest source of microbes in wet weather flows, with a median contribution of approximately 90% in the rising limb and peak flow and about 75% in the declining limb of storms. Furthermore, about 70 to 75% of the microbes in the storm drain outfall water came from materials washed off from the street surfaces in the watershed. Fecal samples did not appear to contribute substantially to the microbes in environmental samples. The results highlight the significance of street surfaces in contributing microbial loads to urban streams under wet weather conditions.IMPORTANCE Identifying the sources of microbial contamination is important for developing best management practices to protect the water quality of urban streams for recreational uses. This study collected a large number of water samples from an urban stream under both dry and wet weather conditions and provided quantitative information on the relative contributions of various environmental compartments to the overall microbial contamination in the stream under the two weather conditions. The watershed in this study represents urban watersheds where no dominant fecal sources are consistently present. The findings highlight the importance of reducing the direct contribution of microbes from street surfaces in the watershed to urban streams under wet weather conditions. The methods and findings from this study are expected to be useful to stormwater managers and regulatory agencies.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dry weather condition; microbial source tracking; urban stream; wet weather condition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29858206      PMCID: PMC6052279          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00896-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  51 in total

1.  Temporal variation and persistence of bacteria in streams.

Authors:  Shesh R Koirala; Randall W Gentry; Edmund Perfect; John S Schwartz; Gary S Sayler
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 2.751

2.  Characterization of pollutants in Florida street sweepings for management and reuse.

Authors:  Yong-Chul Jang; Pradeep Jain; Thabet Tolaymat; Brajesh Dubey; Timothy Townsend
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Evaluation of molecular- and culture-dependent MST markers to detect fecal contamination and indicate viral presence in good quality groundwater.

Authors:  D Diston; M Sinreich; S Zimmermann; A Baumgartner; R Felleisen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Multi-Year Microbial Source Tracking Study Characterizing Fecal Contamination in an Urban Watershed.

Authors:  Rebecca N Bushon; Amie M G Brady; Eric D Christensen; Erin A Stelzer
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 1.946

5.  Source tracking using microbial community fingerprints: Method comparison with hydrodynamic modelling.

Authors:  D T McCarthy; D Jovanovic; A Lintern; I Teakle; M Barnes; A Deletic; R Coleman; G Rooney; T Prosser; S Coutts; M R Hipsey; L C Bruce; R Henry
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Urban greenness influences airborne bacterial community composition.

Authors:  Gwynne Mhuireach; Bart R Johnson; Adam E Altrichter; Joshua Ladau; James F Meadow; Katherine S Pollard; Jessica L Green
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Survival of pathogenic bacteria in various freshwater sediments.

Authors:  G A Burton; D Gunnison; G R Lanza
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Intra-event variability of Escherichia coli and total suspended solids in urban stormwater runoff.

Authors:  D T McCarthy; J M Hathaway; W F Hunt; A Deletic
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  The first microbial environment of infants born by C-section: the operating room microbes.

Authors:  Hakdong Shin; Zhiheng Pei; Keith A Martinez; Juana I Rivera-Vinas; Keimari Mendez; Humberto Cavallin; Maria G Dominguez-Bello
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.650

10.  Bacterial diversity in two Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).

Authors:  Krissi M Hewitt; Frank L Mannino; Antonio Gonzalez; John H Chase; J Gregory Caporaso; Rob Knight; Scott T Kelley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The flux and impact of wastewater infrastructure microorganisms on human and ecosystem health.

Authors:  Ryan J Newton; Jill S McClary
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 9.740

2.  Bacterial diversity and predicted enzymatic function in a multipurpose surface water system - from wastewater effluent discharges to drinking water production.

Authors:  Ananda Tiwari; Anna-Maria Hokajärvi; Jorge Santo Domingo; Michael Elk; Balamuralikrishna Jayaprakash; Hodon Ryu; Sallamaari Siponen; Asko Vepsäläinen; Ari Kauppinen; Osmo Puurunen; Aki Artimo; Noora Perkola; Timo Huttula; Ilkka T Miettinen; Tarja Pitkänen
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2021-05-22

3.  Identifying Sources of Faecal Contamination in a Small Urban Stream Catchment: A Multiparametric Approach.

Authors:  Liam J Reynolds; Niamh A Martin; Laura Sala-Comorera; Kevin Callanan; Padraig Doyle; Clare O'Leary; Paul Buggy; Tristan M Nolan; Gregory M P O'Hare; John J O'Sullivan; Wim G Meijer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Bacterial Indicators Are Ubiquitous Members of Pelagic Microbiome in Anthropogenically Impacted Coastal Ecosystem.

Authors:  Neža Orel; Eduard Fadeev; Katja Klun; Matjaž Ličer; Tinkara Tinta; Valentina Turk
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.