Literature DB >> 26002893

Microbial Source Tracking in Adjacent Karst Springs.

Shoshanit Ohad1, Dalit Vaizel-Ohayon2, Meir Rom2, Joseph Guttman2, Diego Berger2, Valeria Kravitz3, Shlomo Pilo3, Zohar Huberman3, Yechezkel Kashi4, Efrat Rorman3.   

Abstract

Modern man-made environments, including urban, agricultural, and industrial environments, have complex ecological interactions among themselves and with the natural surroundings. Microbial source tracking (MST) offers advanced tools to resolve the host source of fecal contamination beyond indicator monitoring. This study was intended to assess karst spring susceptibilities to different fecal sources using MST quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays targeting human, bovine, and swine markers. It involved a dual-time monitoring frame: (i) monthly throughout the calendar year and (ii) daily during a rainfall event. Data integration was taken from both monthly and daily MST profile monitoring and improved identification of spring susceptibility to host fecal contamination; three springs located in close geographic proximity revealed different MST profiles. The Giach spring showed moderate fluctuations of MST marker quantities amid wet and dry samplings, while the Zuf spring had the highest rise of the GenBac3 marker during the wet event, which was mirrored in other markers as well. The revelation of human fecal contamination during the dry season not connected to incidents of raining leachates suggests a continuous and direct exposure to septic systems. Pigpens were identified in the watersheds of Zuf, Shefa, and Giach springs and on the border of the Gaaton spring watershed. Their impact was correlated with partial detection of the Pig-2-Bac marker in Gaaton spring, which was lower than detection levels in all three of the other springs. Ruminant and swine markers were detected intermittently, and their contamination potential during the wet samplings was exposed. These results emphasized the importance of sampling design to utilize the MST approach to delineate subtleties of fecal contamination in the environment.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26002893      PMCID: PMC4495197          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00855-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  40 in total

1.  Quantitative identification of fecal water pollution sources by TaqMan real-time PCR assays using Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genetic markers.

Authors:  Dae-Young Lee; Susan C Weir; Hung Lee; Jack T Trevors
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  HuBac and nifH source tracking markers display a relationship to land use but not rainfall.

Authors:  Jennifer Gentry-Shields; Jakob G Rowny; Jill R Stewart
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Combining land use information and small stream sampling with PCR-based methods for better characterization of diffuse sources of human fecal pollution.

Authors:  Lindsay A Peed; Christopher T Nietch; Catherine A Kelty; Mark Meckes; Thomas Mooney; Mano Sivaganesan; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  High diversity and differential persistence of fecal Bacteroidales population spiked into freshwater microcosm.

Authors:  Zhanbei Liang; Zhenli He; Xuxia Zhou; Charles A Powell; Yuangen Yang; Michael G Roberts; Peter J Stoffella
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 5.  State of the art molecular markers for fecal pollution source tracking in water.

Authors:  Peter Roslev; Annette S Bukh
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Comparison of 61 sequenced Escherichia coli genomes.

Authors:  Oksana Lukjancenko; Trudy M Wassenaar; David W Ussery
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Dramatic improvements in beach water quality following gull removal.

Authors:  Reagan R Converse; Julie L Kinzelman; Elizabeth A Sams; Edward Hudgens; Alfred P Dufour; Hodon Ryu; Jorge W Santo-Domingo; Catherine A Kelty; Orin C Shanks; Shawn D Siefring; Richard A Haugland; Timothy J Wade
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Microbial source tracking in a coastal California watershed reveals canines as controllable sources of fecal contamination.

Authors:  Jared S Ervin; Laurie C Van De Werfhorst; Jill L S Murray; Patricia A Holden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Multitiered approach using quantitative PCR to track sources of fecal pollution affecting Santa Monica Bay, California.

Authors:  Rachel T Noble; John F Griffith; A Denene Blackwood; Jed A Fuhrman; Jason B Gregory; Ximena Hernandez; Xiaolin Liang; Angie A Bera; Kenneth Schiff
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Hypothesis-driven approach for the identification of fecal pollution sources in water resources.

Authors:  G H Reischer; D Kollanur; J Vierheilig; C Wehrspaun; R L Mach; R Sommer; H Stadler; A H Farnleitner
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  6 in total

1.  Use of coliphages to investigate norovirus contamination in a shellfish growing area in Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Kyuseon Cho; Cheonghoon Lee; SungJun Park; Jin Hwi Kim; Yong Seon Choi; Man Su Kim; Eung Seo Koo; Hyun Jin Yoon; Joo-Hyon Kang; Yong Seok Jeong; Jong Duck Choi; GwangPyo Ko
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Opening the black box of spring water microbiology from alpine karst aquifers to support proactive drinking water resource management.

Authors:  Domenico Savio; Philipp Stadler; Georg H Reischer; Alexander K T Kirschner; Katalin Demeter; Rita Linke; Alfred P Blaschke; Regina Sommer; Ulrich Szewzyk; Inés C Wilhartitz; Robert L Mach; Hermann Stadler; Andreas H Farnleitner
Journal:  WIREs Water       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 6.139

3.  Urbanization Impacts the Physicochemical Characteristics and Abundance of Fecal Markers and Bacterial Pathogens in Surface Water.

Authors:  Tianma Yuan; Kiran Kumar Vadde; Jonathan D Tonkin; Jianjun Wang; Jing Lu; Zimeng Zhang; Yixin Zhang; Alan J McCarthy; Raju Sekar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Host-Specific Bacteroides Markers-Based Microbial Source Tracking in Aquaculture Areas.

Authors:  Hye Young Ko; Kyuseon Cho; SungJun Park; Jin Hwi Kim; Joo-Hyon Kang; Yong Seok Jeong; Jong Duck Choi; Yongsik Sin; Cheonghoon Lee; GwangPyo Ko
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Spatial and temporal dynamics of bacterioplankton community composition in a subtropical dammed karst river of southwestern China.

Authors:  Shi Yu; Ruoxue He; Ang Song; Yadan Huang; Zhenjiang Jin; Yueming Liang; Qiang Li; Xiaohong Wang; Werner E G Müller; Jianhua Cao
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Microfluidic Array Chip for Parallel Detection of Waterborne Bacteria.

Authors:  Lena Gorgannezhad; Kamalalayam Rajan Sreejith; Jun Zhang; Gregor Kijanka; Melody Christie; Helen Stratton; Nam-Trung Nguyen
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.891

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.