Literature DB >> 17630399

An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens.

E A Rakha1, I O Ellis.   

Abstract

Needle core biopsy (NCB), as part of triple assessment for preoperative evaluation and diagnosis of breast cancer, is now considered as an established, highly accurate method for diagnosing breast cancer that has replaced either fine needle aspiration cytology or excisional biopsy as the initial diagnostic biopsy procedures in many institutions. In addition to its primary role in establishing an accurate histological diagnosis, NCB can potentially provide important additional pathological prognostic information which may be of direct clinical value in certain situations, such as patients being considered for preoperative (neoadjuvant) therapy. With this background in mind we briefly review the current role of NCB in breast cancer diagnosis and then concentrate this review on the usefulness and issues relating to use of this technique in providing accurate, reliable and clinically relevant preoperative prognostic and predictive information in patients with breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17630399      PMCID: PMC2095575          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2006.045377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  114 in total

1.  Pathologic features of breast cancer associated with complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: importance of tumor necrosis.

Authors:  Robert T Pu; Anne F Schott; David E Sturtz; Kent A Griffith; Celina G Kleer
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Do the histologic features and results of breast cancer biomarker studies differ between core biopsy and surgical excision specimens?

Authors:  Chandra N Burge; Helena R Chang; Sophia K Apple
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Menses and breast cancer: does timing of mammographically directed core biopsy affect outcome?

Authors:  J Macleod; R Fraser; N Horeczko
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Conversion to core biopsy in preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions: is it justified by results?

Authors:  J Shannon; A G Douglas-Jones; N S Dallimore
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Does the method of biopsy affect the incidence of sentinel lymph node metastases?

Authors:  Erika L Newman; Amina Kahn; Kathleen M Diehl; Vincent M Cimmino; Celina A Kleer; Alfred E Chang; Lisa A Newman; Michael S Sabel
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Histological precision of stereotactic core biopsy in diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions.

Authors:  J E Dahlstrom; S Sutton; S Jain
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Histologic grading at breast core needle biopsy: comparison with results from the excised breast specimen.

Authors:  Debra L Monticciolo
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Freehand core biopsy in breast cancer: an accurate predictor of tumour grade following neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

Authors:  S A McIntosh; L Panchalingam; S Payne; I D Miller; T K Sarkar; A W Hutcheon; S D Heys
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. III. Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  S E Pinder; I O Ellis; M Galea; S O'Rouke; R W Blamey; C W Elston
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Correlation of histologic prognostic factors in core biopsies and therapeutic excisions of invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Gavin C Harris; Helen E Denley; Sarah E Pinder; Andrew H S Lee; Ian O Ellis; Christopher W Elston; Andrew Evans
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  38 in total

1.  Breast Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Characterization of HER2 gene amplification heterogeneity in invasive and in situ breast cancer using bright-field in situ hybridization.

Authors:  António Polónia; Guilherme Oliveira; Fernando Schmitt
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Determinants of stage at diagnosis of breast cancer in Nigerian women: sociodemographic, breast cancer awareness, health care access and clinical factors.

Authors:  Elima Jedy-Agba; Valerie McCormack; Oluwole Olaomi; Wunmi Badejo; Monday Yilkudi; Terna Yawe; Emmanuel Ezeome; Iliya Salu; Elijah Miner; Ikechukwu Anosike; Sally N Adebamowo; Benjamin Achusi; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Clement Adebamowo
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 4.  The Evolving Role of Vacuum Assisted Biopsy of the Breast: A Progression from Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy.

Authors:  Ian C Bennett; Apoorva Saboo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Do clinical and radiologic features help predict malignancy of B3 breast lesions without epithelial atypia (B3a)?

Authors:  Iliana Bednarova; Viviana Londero; Anna Linda; Rossano Girometti; Michele Lorenzon; Sandra Bednarova; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Diamond-lipid hybrids enhance chemotherapeutic tolerance and mediate tumor regression.

Authors:  Laura K Moore; Edward K Chow; Eiji Osawa; J Michael Bishop; Dean Ho
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  Sonographic correlations with the new molecular classification of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  I T H Au-Yong; A J Evans; S Taneja; E A Rakha; A R Green; C Paish; I O Ellis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  B3-lesions of the breast and cancer risk - an analysis of mammography screening patients.

Authors:  Oliver Hoffmann; Gesina Athina Stamatis; Ann-Kathrin Bittner; Georg Arnold; Rolf Schnabel; Karlgeorg Krüger; Rainer Kimmig; Martin Heubner
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-23

Review 9.  [Invasive breast cancer: the current WHO classification].

Authors:  A Lebeau; M Kriegsmann; E Burandt; H-P Sinn
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.011

10.  Evolution of breast cancer management in Ireland: a decade of change.

Authors:  Helen M Heneghan; Ruth S Prichard; Amanda Devaney; Karl J Sweeney; C Malone; Ray McLaughlin; Michael J Kerin
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.