Literature DB >> 8803597

Histological precision of stereotactic core biopsy in diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions.

J E Dahlstrom1, S Sutton, S Jain.   

Abstract

The reliability of stereotactic core biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions was assessed in comparison to excision biopsy in patients with non-palpable suspicious breast lesions detected in a mammography breast screening programme. Fifty-two cases of malignancy and nine of atypical ductal hyperplasia were diagnosed on the programme during the two year period July 1993 to June 1995; two patients did not have excision biopsy. Stereotactic core biopsies and representative sections from 59 excision specimens from the same patients were assessed "blind' by one pathologist. All 51 cancers diagnosed on stereotactic core biopsy were confirmed to be malignant on excision biopsy. There was 96% concordance between stereotactic core biopsy and excision biopsy for the diagnosis of invasive or in situ cancer, and 78% concordance for the type of cancer. The stereotactic core biopsy and excision biopsy diagnoses were: invasive ductal carcinomas (39 on stereotactic core biopsy vs. 33 on excision biopsy), mucinous carcinomas (1 vs. 2), invasive lobular carcinomas (3 vs, 8), and in situ carcinomas (8 vs. 8), two of which had invasive cancer present only in the stereotactic core biopsy. Of the nine cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on stereotactic core biopsy, eight had an excision biopsy, six showed low nuclear grade in situ or invasive cancer, one had a 3 mm focus of high grade invasive ductal cancer and one was atypical ductal hyperplasia. In the invasive ductal carcinoma group stereotactic core biopsy underestimated tumour grade: In nine cases (31%) the cancer at excision was of a higher grade. Stereotactic core biopsy is a reliable alternative to excision biopsy in the diagnosis of breast cancer, however, stereotactic core biopsy may underestimate tumour grade in invasive ductal carcinoma and may not differentiate between invasive ductal carcinoma and lobular carcinoma. It is recommended that the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia on stereotactic core biopsy be followed by excision biopsy, as stereotactic core biopsy underestimates the presence of cancer in this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8803597     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1996.d01-463.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  9 in total

1.  The role and histological classification of needle core biopsy in comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative assessment of impalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  A E Ibrahim; A C Bateman; J M Theaker; J L Low; B Addis; P Tidbury; C Rubin; M Briley; G T Royle
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  H Denley; S E Pinder; C W Elston; A H Lee; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  E A Rakha; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Association of breast cancer with the finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core breast biopsy.

Authors:  M M Moore; C W Hargett; J B Hanks; L L Fajardo; J A Harvey; H F Frierson; C L Slingluff
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia and patient management.

Authors:  A Ancona; M Capodieci; A Galiano; F Mangieri; V Lorusso; G Gatta
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Predictive factors for breast cancer in patients diagnosed atypical ductal hyperplasia at core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Byung Joo Chae; Ahwon Lee; Byung Joo Song; Sang Seol Jung
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Underestimation of cancer in case of diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) by vacuum assisted core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Karol Polom; Dawid Murawa; Paweł Kurzawa; Michał Michalak; Paweł Murawa
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-04-10

8.  Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia of the Breast on Core Needle Biopsy: Risk of Malignant Upgrade on Surgical Excision.

Authors:  Tiffany Sin Hui Bong; Jun Kiat Thaddaeus Tan; Juliana Teng Swan Ho; Puay Hoon Tan; Wing Sze Lau; Tuan Meng Tan; Jill Su Lin Wong; Veronique Kiak Mien Tan; Benita Kiat Tee Tan; Preetha Madhukumar; Wei Sean Yong; Sue Zann Lim; Chow Yin Wong; Kong Wee Ong; Yirong Sim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 3.588

9.  The ratio of atypical ductal hyperplasia foci to core numbers in needle biopsy: a practical index predicting breast cancer in subsequent excision.

Authors:  Jeong-Ju Lee; Hee Jin Lee; Jun Kang; Jeong-Hyeon Jo; Gyungyub Gong
Journal:  Korean J Pathol       Date:  2012-02-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.