Literature DB >> 12502923

Correlation of histologic prognostic factors in core biopsies and therapeutic excisions of invasive breast carcinoma.

Gavin C Harris1, Helen E Denley, Sarah E Pinder, Andrew H S Lee, Ian O Ellis, Christopher W Elston, Andrew Evans.   

Abstract

Breast core biopsy is one of the major nonoperative methods of diagnosis. Increasingly, there is also a need to provide prognostic data to facilitate timely patient management. We present the results from 500 patients with invasive breast carcinoma, who underwent core biopsy followed by a therapeutic surgical procedure. Grade and type of the invasive and in situ carcinoma, together with the presence or absence of vascular invasion, were determined in both biopsy and definitive surgical excision and the results compared. There was 67% agreement with overall grade (kappa value 0.48), with scores for tubule formation, pleomorphism, and mitotic scoring achieving values of 82%, 73%, and 58%, respectively. Only 60% of grade 1 and 2 carcinomas showed concordance, but 84% of grade 3 tumors showed agreement between core and excision results. Tumor typing, vascular invasion, and grading of ductal carcinoma in situ had agreement values of 74%, 69%, and 65%, respectively. The major problem with assessing prognostic factors on needle biopsy specimens is undersampling of the most informative areas. However, in those patients in whom preoperative assessment of prognostic factors is most likely to be beneficial, i.e., those with grade 3 carcinomas, a high level of agreement was achieved in this large study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12502923     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200301000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  32 in total

1.  Accuracy of typing and grading invasive mammary carcinomas on core needle biopsy compared with the excisional specimen.

Authors:  Victor Piana de Andrade; Helenice Gobbi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  E A Rakha; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Determinants of stage at diagnosis of breast cancer in Nigerian women: sociodemographic, breast cancer awareness, health care access and clinical factors.

Authors:  Elima Jedy-Agba; Valerie McCormack; Oluwole Olaomi; Wunmi Badejo; Monday Yilkudi; Terna Yawe; Emmanuel Ezeome; Iliya Salu; Elijah Miner; Ikechukwu Anosike; Sally N Adebamowo; Benjamin Achusi; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Clement Adebamowo
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  [Improvement of breast cancer grading in punch biopsies: grading with the Ki-67 marker].

Authors:  R von Wasielewski; K Klöpper; H J Lück; H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Relationship between DCE-MRI morphological and functional features and histopathological characteristics of breast cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Montemurro; Laura Martincich; Ivana Sarotto; Ilaria Bertotto; Riccardo Ponzone; Lisa Cellini; Stefania Redana; Piero Sismondi; Massimo Aglietta; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Molecular Subtypes and Local-Regional Control of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Simona Maria Fragomeni; Andrew Sciallis; Jacqueline S Jeruss
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.495

7.  Association of primary tumour FDG uptake with clinical, histopathological and molecular characteristics in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  B B Koolen; M J T F D Vrancken Peeters; J Wesseling; E H Lips; W V Vogel; T S Aukema; E van Werkhoven; K G A Gilhuijs; S Rodenhuis; E J Th Rutgers; R A Valdés Olmos
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Prognostic value of proliferation in invasive breast cancer: a review.

Authors:  P J van Diest; E van der Wall; J P A Baak
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Prognostic and predictive factors and genetic analysis of early breast cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Martín; Fernando González Palacios; Javier Cortés; Juan de la Haba; José Schneider
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Agreement between preoperative core needle biopsy and postoperative invasive breast cancer histopathology is not dependent on the amount of clinical material obtained.

Authors:  R O'Leary; K Hawkins; J C S Beazley; M R J Lansdown; A M Hanby
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.