Literature DB >> 27123266

B3-lesions of the breast and cancer risk - an analysis of mammography screening patients.

Oliver Hoffmann1, Gesina Athina Stamatis2, Ann-Kathrin Bittner1, Georg Arnold3, Rolf Schnabel4, Karlgeorg Krüger5, Rainer Kimmig1, Martin Heubner1.   

Abstract

The use of mammography screening, followed by needle core biopsy (NCB), is associated with an increasing amount of invasive procedures. A considerable amount of specimens must be classified as lesions with uncertain malignant potential (B3-lesion). In these cases, an open biopsy is indicated for further diagnosis. We evaluated patients with B3-lesions to determine the risk of malignancy corresponding to the histopathological NCB results and the type of radiological lesion identified. A total of 95 patients participating in the German mammography screening program with a B3-lesion following NCB (104 B3-lesions in total) were included in our analysis. We analyzed the correlation between the initial histopathological findings from the NCB specimen and cancer risk. We further analyzed the correlations of malignant results with the type of mammographic lesion. In 23 cases (22%), histopathological examination following excision revealed a malignant lesion, including invasive and in situ carcinoma. The positive predictive value of the subgroups of B3-lesions ranged between 0.11 and 0.31; the B3-lesion associated with the highest cancer risk was the atypical ductal hyperplasia; however, no significant difference was observed between the B3-lesion subgroups (P=0.309) regarding the risk of malignancy. Comparing the different types of mammographic findings, such as radiological mass or microcalcifications, there was no significant difference in the risk for malignancy (P=0.379). The different types of B3-lesions did not exhibit differences in the risk for malignancy, and the morphological type of mammographic lesion does not appear to be correlated with cancer risk; therefore, our results underline the need for open biopsy in patients with B3-lesions following NCB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B-coding system; B3-lesion; breast cancer; mammography screening; needle core biopsy; open biopsy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27123266      PMCID: PMC4840559          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2016.790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  18 in total

1.  Best Practice No 179. Guidelines for breast needle core biopsy handling and reporting in breast screening assessment.

Authors:  I O Ellis; S Humphreys; M Michell; S E Pinder; C A Wells; H D Zakhour
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  E A Rakha; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Non-malignant breast papillary lesions - b3 diagnosed on ultrasound--guided 14-gauge needle core biopsy: analysis of 114 cases from a single institution and review of the literature.

Authors:  Simonetta Bianchi; Benedetta Bendinelli; Valeria Saladino; Vania Vezzosi; Beniamino Brancato; Jacopo Nori; Domenico Palli
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.

Authors:  S G Orel; N Kay; C Reynolds; D C Sullivan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Borderline breast lesions: comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device.

Authors:  Viviana Londero; Chiara Zuiani; Anna Linda; Luisa Battigelli; Giovanni Brondani; Massimo Bazzocchi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  B3 breast lesions determined by vacuum-assisted biopsy: how to reduce the frequency of benign excision biopsies.

Authors:  M Tonegutti; V Girardi; S Ciatto; E Manfrin; F Bonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Minimal invasive biopsy results of "uncertain malignant potential" in digital mammography screening: high prevalence but also high predictive value for malignancy.

Authors:  S Weigel; T Decker; E Korsching; C Biesheuvel; A Wöstmann; W Böcker; D Hungermann; K Roterberg; J Tio; W Heindel
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2011-04-19

Review 8.  Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy.

Authors:  L Liberman
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Is mode of presentation of B3 breast core biopsies (screen-detected or symptomatic) a distinguishing factor in the final histopathologic result or risk of diagnosis of malignancy?

Authors:  Gael M Maclean; Stephen P Courtney; Hilary Umeh; Siriathan Sanjeev; Colin McCormick; Brendan M Smith
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Excision biopsy findings of patients with breast needle core biopsies reported as suspicious of malignancy (B4) or lesion of uncertain malignant potential (B3).

Authors:  A H S Lee; H E Denley; S E Pinder; I O Ellis; C W Elston; P Vujovic; R D Macmillan; A J Evans
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.087

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pre- and post-contrast versus post-contrast cone-beam breast CT: can we reduce radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy?

Authors:  Johannes Uhlig; Uwe Fischer; Lorenz Biggemann; Joachim Lotz; Susanne Wienbeck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI.

Authors:  Susanne Wienbeck; Uwe Fischer; Susanne Luftner-Nagel; Joachim Lotz; Johannes Uhlig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Do clinical and radiologic features help predict malignancy of B3 breast lesions without epithelial atypia (B3a)?

Authors:  Iliana Bednarova; Viviana Londero; Anna Linda; Rossano Girometti; Michele Lorenzon; Sandra Bednarova; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Effectiveness of the diagnostic pathway of BLES: could it be safely used as a therapeutic method in selected benign lesions?

Authors:  Tuğba İlkem Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan; Sibel Özkan Gürdal; Meltem Öznur; Ömer Özçağlayan; Mücahit Doğru; Birol Topçu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Simplifying Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification of mammograms with pure suspicious calcifications.

Authors:  Gisela Lg Menezes; Gonneke Ao Winter-Warnars; Eva L Koekenbier; Emma J Groen; Helena M Verkooijen; Ruud M Pijnappel
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  A ten-year, single-center experience: Concordance between breast core needle biopsy/vacuum-assisted biopsy and postoperative histopathology in B3 and B5a cases.

Authors:  Mohamed Elsharkawy; Thomas Vestring; Hans-Juergen Raatschen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The breast lesion excision system procedure: An optimal solution for the management of indeterminate BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions in women with severe anxiety.

Authors:  Semih Hot; Zafer Ü Coşkun; Adem Akçakaya; Ömer Bender; Ülkü A Türkmen; Pınar Ö Nayır; Ayhan Sarı; Ayşe B Hot
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.484

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.