Literature DB >> 17629737

Refracture following fracture liaison service assessment illustrates the requirement for integrated falls and fracture services.

Claire R Langridge1, Carol McQuillian, Walter S Watson, Barbara Walker, Lara Mitchell, Stephen J Gallacher.   

Abstract

The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) allows appropriate antiosteoporosis therapy to be targeted to potentially reduce future fracture risk. A proportion of these treated patients will still experience a further fracture. This work reviews the characteristics of these patients. Data were collated for patients >65 years old presenting to the South Glasgow FLS between January 2001 and August 2004. There were 2,489 patients who presented (incident fracture group), and 129 (5.2%) sustained an additional fracture (refracture group). Median age of the incident fracture group was 77.8 years vs. 80.6 years for the refracture group (P = nonsignificant). The refracture group was determined according to whether their incident fracture was hip (n = 47) or nonhip (n = 82). When the incident fracture was hip, a refracture was more likely to be a further hip fracture (chi(2) = 14.4, P = 0.002) and patients refractured sooner (median time to refracture 194 [range 10-1,134] days vs. 258 [range 6-1,081] days [nonhip]) (P = nonsignificant). In the refracture group, 76% of patients were already on osteoporosis treatment after their incident fracture. Patients over 65 years of age presenting to FLS who sustain an additional fracture are older; are likely to sustain another hip fracture after an incident hip fracture; often refracture early, particularly when the incident fracture is of the hip; and are often already on antiosteoporosis treatment. Therefore, it is important to identify these high-risk patients and offer a combined approach of prompt drug treatment through a systematic and specialist osteoporosis management team along with reducing any reversible falls risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17629737     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-007-9042-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  11 in total

Review 1.  Fracture Liaison Services in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Paul J Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Ganda; M Puech; J S Chen; R Speerin; J Bleasel; J R Center; J A Eisman; L March; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients.

Authors:  D Marsh; K Akesson; D E Beaton; E R Bogoch; S Boonen; M-L Brandi; A R McLellan; P J Mitchell; J E M Sale; D A Wahl
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Systematic review on interventions to improve osteoporosis investigation and treatment in fragility fracture patients.

Authors:  J E M Sale; D Beaton; J Posen; V Elliot-Gibson; E Bogoch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Fracture Liaison Services: the UK experience.

Authors:  P J Mitchell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Targeted intervention reduces refracture rates in patients with incident non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a 4-year prospective controlled study.

Authors:  A Lih; H Nandapalan; M Kim; C Yap; P Lee; K Ganda; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  A review of patient-centred post-fracture interventions in the context of theories of health behaviour change.

Authors:  R Sujic; M A Gignac; R Cockerill; D E Beaton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The Role of the Fracture Liaison Service in Osteoporosis Care.

Authors:  Sean Bonanni; Amelia A Sorensen; Jonathan Dubin; Betty Drees
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

9.  Post-discharge management following hip fracture--get you back to B4: a parallel group, randomized controlled trial study protocol.

Authors:  Wendy L Cook; Karim M Khan; Michelle H Bech; Penelope M Brasher; Roy A Brown; Stirling Bryan; Meghan G Donaldson; Pierre Guy; Heather M Hanson; Cheryl Leia; Erin M Macri; Joanie Sims-Gould; Heather A McKay; Maureen C Ashe
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 10.  The Phenotype of Patients with a Recent Fracture: A Literature Survey of the Fracture Liaison Service.

Authors:  Lisanne Vranken; Caroline E Wyers; Joop P W van den Bergh; Piet P M M Geusens
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.