Literature DB >> 21607807

Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients.

D Marsh1, K Akesson, D E Beaton, E R Bogoch, S Boonen, M-L Brandi, A R McLellan, P J Mitchell, J E M Sale, D A Wahl.   

Abstract

The underlying causes of incident fractures--bone fragility and the tendency to fall--remain under-diagnosed and under-treated. This care gap in secondary prevention must be addressed to minimise both the debilitating consequences of subsequent fractures for patients and the associated economic burden to healthcare systems. Clinical systems aimed at ensuring appropriate management of patients following fracture have been developed around the world. A systematic review of the literature showed that 65% of systems reported include a dedicated coordinator who acts as the link between the orthopaedic team, the osteoporosis and falls services, the patient and the primary care physician. Coordinator-based systems facilitate bone mineral density testing, osteoporosis education and care in patients following a fragility fracture and have been shown to be cost-saving. Other success factors included a fracture registry and a database to monitor the care provided to the fracture patient. Implementation of such a system requires an audit of existing arrangements, creation of a network of healthcare professionals with clearly defined roles and the identification of a 'medical champion' to lead the project. A business case is needed to acquire the necessary funding. Incremental, achievable targets should be identified. Clinical pathways should be supported by evidence-based recommendations from national or regional guidelines. Endorsement of the proposed model within national healthcare policies and advocacy programmes can achieve alignment of the objectives of policy makers, professionals and patients. Successful transformation of care relies upon consensus amongst all participants in the multi-disciplinary team that cares for fragility fracture patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21607807     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1642-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  84 in total

1.  Medical management of patients over 50 years admitted to orthopedic surgery for low-energy fracture.

Authors:  Régis Levasseur; Jean-Pierre Sabatier; Catherine Guilcher; Geneviève Guaydier-Souquières; Valérie Costentin-Pignol; Pierre-Yves Jean-Jacques; Christophe Hulet; Claude Vielpeau; Christian Marcelli
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  Osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment intervention after hip or shoulder fracture. A comparison of two centres in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  A W Murray; C McQuillan; B Kennon; S J Gallacher
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  The inpatient consultation approach to osteoporosis treatment in patients with a fracture. Is automatic consultation needed?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Streeten; Asif Mohamed; Amish Gandhi; Denise Orwig; Paul Sack; Robert Sterling; Vincent D Pellegrini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Osteoporosis: impact on health and economics.

Authors:  Nicholas Harvey; Elaine Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 5.  Rational use of oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Julian M R Mathoo; Ann Cranney; Alexandra Papaioannou; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Osteoporosis disease management in a rural health care population: hip fracture reduction and reduced costs in postmenopausal women after 5 years.

Authors:  E D Newman; W T Ayoub; R H Starkey; J M Diehl; G C Wood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Long-term survival and fracture risk after hip fracture: a 22-year follow-up in women.

Authors:  My von Friesendorff; Jack Besjakov; Kristina Akesson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Ya-Ting Chen; Thomas A Abbott; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Paul D Miller; Lois E Wehren; Marc L Berger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24

9.  Implementation of a mandatory rheumatology osteoporosis consultation in patients with low-impact hip fracture.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Quintos-Macasa; Robert Quinet; Malik Spady; Jerald Zakem; William Davis; Yamini Menon; Leonard Serebro; M A Krousel-Wood
Journal:  J Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.517

10.  Vitamin D and calcium supplementation prevents osteoporotic fractures in elderly community dwelling residents: a pragmatic population-based 3-year intervention study.

Authors:  Erik Roj Larsen; Leif Mosekilde; Anders Foldspang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  99 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Saito; J M Sterbenz; S Malay; L Zhong; M P MacEachern; K C Chung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  High-risk osteoporosis clinic (HiROC): improving osteoporosis and postfracture care with an organized, programmatic approach.

Authors:  T P Olenginski; G Maloney-Saxon; C K Matzko; K Mackiewicz; H L Kirchner; A Bengier; E D Newman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Cost-effectiveness of the Concord Minimal Trauma Fracture Liaison service, a prospective, controlled fracture prevention study.

Authors:  M S Cooper; A J Palmer; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Development of an electronic medical record based intervention to improve medical care of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B J Edwards; A D Bunta; J Anderson; A Bobb; A Hahr; K J O'Leary; A Agulnek; L Andruszyn; K A Cameron; M May; N H Kazmers; N Dillon; D W Baker; M V Williams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service--a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision.

Authors:  J H E Yong; L Masucci; J S Hoch; R Sujic; D Beaton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Knowledge of orthopaedic surgeons in managing patients with fragility fracture.

Authors:  Reza Sorbi; Mohamad Reza Aghamirsalim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Osteoporosis and the orthopaedic surgeon: basic concepts for successful co-management of patients' bone health.

Authors:  Ryan P Farmer; Benoit Herbert; Derly O Cuellar; Jiandong Hao; Philip F Stahel; Robin Yasui; David J Hak; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Critical impact of patient knowledge and bone density testing on starting osteoporosis treatment after fragility fracture: secondary analyses from two controlled trials.

Authors:  S R Majumdar; F A McAlister; J A Johnson; D L Weir; D Bellerose; D A Hanley; A S Russell; B H Rowe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Delivering a quality-assured fracture liaison service in a UK teaching hospital-is it achievable?

Authors:  K E Shipman; J Stammers; A Doyle; N Gittoes
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Initiation of osteoporosis assessment in the fracture clinic results in improved osteoporosis management: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J M Queally; C Kiernan; M Shaikh; F Rowan; D Bennett
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.