Literature DB >> 21305267

A review of patient-centred post-fracture interventions in the context of theories of health behaviour change.

R Sujic1, M A Gignac, R Cockerill, D E Beaton.   

Abstract

The purpose of this literature review is to determine whether and to what extent current post-fracture osteoporosis interventions utilize theories of health behaviour change and whether those that are theory-based are more successful in producing desired behaviour changes. Studies were identified by applying additional criteria to the final selection stage of a systematic review of non-surgical osteoporosis interventions in the orthopaedic environment. We identified 42 primary studies targeted at patients and improving post-fracture osteoporosis care. As well as describing the studies (in terms of design, population, interventions, outcomes), we focused on theoretical framework and elements of behaviour change models. The 42 studies included in this review utilized a variety of post-fracture interventions; however, none of them reported using an underlying theoretical base. Only three studies drew on what we felt to be elements of a theoretical framework. The lack of theoretically based studies points to a currently under-utilized area of behaviour change research that could be applied to post-fracture interventions in order to make them more effective. Despite an abundance of literature supporting theories of behaviour change, post-fracture osteoporosis interventions do not report utilizing these theories. Theories of behaviour change could be applied to post-fracture osteoporosis interventions to explain why patients initiate osteoporosis management. Future research should explore the application of theories of health behaviour change to post-fracture interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21305267     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1521-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  74 in total

1.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  An AOA critical issue. The future of the orthopaedic surgeon-proceduralist or keeper of the musculoskeletal system?

Authors:  Scott D Boden; Thomas A Einhorn; Tamara S Morgan; Laura L Tosi; James N Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  DXA, health beliefs, and osteoporosis prevention behaviors.

Authors:  Carol A Sedlak; Margaret O Doheny; Patricia J Estok; Richard A Zeller; Janice Winchell
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2007-10

Review 4.  How can osteoporosis patients benefit more from their therapy? Adherence issues with bisphosphonate therapy.

Authors:  Deborah T Gold; Ivy M Alexander; Mark P Ettinger
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

6.  Medical management of patients over 50 years admitted to orthopedic surgery for low-energy fracture.

Authors:  Régis Levasseur; Jean-Pierre Sabatier; Catherine Guilcher; Geneviève Guaydier-Souquières; Valérie Costentin-Pignol; Pierre-Yves Jean-Jacques; Christophe Hulet; Claude Vielpeau; Christian Marcelli
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 7.  Psychoeducational interventions in rheumatic diseases: a review of papers published from September 2001 to August 2002.

Authors:  Kathleen Mulligan; Stanton Newman
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  First Fracture Project: addressing the osteoporosis care gap.

Authors:  J Vaile; L Sullivan; C Bennett; J Bleasel
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.048

9.  Assessment of inpatient fragility fracture education and outpatient follow-up at an urban tertiary care institution.

Authors:  Richard S Yoon; William Macaulay; Gail Torres; Kate W Nellans; Ethel S Siris; Louis U Bigliani; Carolyn Becker
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.443

10.  Implementation of a mandatory rheumatology osteoporosis consultation in patients with low-impact hip fracture.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Quintos-Macasa; Robert Quinet; Malik Spady; Jerald Zakem; William Davis; Yamini Menon; Leonard Serebro; M A Krousel-Wood
Journal:  J Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.517

View more
  8 in total

1.  Post-fracture care: do we need to educate patients rather than doctors? The PREVOST randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B Merle; R Chapurlat; E Vignot; T Thomas; J Haesebaert; A-M Schott
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Factors influencing the pharmacological management of osteoporosis after fragility fracture: results from the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy's fracture clinic screening program.

Authors:  D E Beaton; S Dyer; D Jiang; R Sujic; M Slater; J E M Sale; E R Bogoch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Patients' Experiences of Nurse Case-Managed Osteoporosis Care: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Lisa A Wozniak; Brian H Rowe; Meghan Ingstrup; Jeffrey A Johnson; Finlay A McAlister; Debbie Bellerose; Lauren A Beaupre; Sumit R Majumdar
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2019-03-11

4.  Critical impact of patient knowledge and bone density testing on starting osteoporosis treatment after fragility fracture: secondary analyses from two controlled trials.

Authors:  S R Majumdar; F A McAlister; J A Johnson; D L Weir; D Bellerose; D A Hanley; A S Russell; B H Rowe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Best practices in secondary fracture prevention: fracture liaison services.

Authors:  Paul J Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  Effectiveness and characteristics of multifaceted osteoporosis group education--a systematic review.

Authors:  A L Jensen; K Lomborg; G Wind; B L Langdahl
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Understanding fragility fracture patients' decision-making process regarding bisphosphonate treatment.

Authors:  L A Wozniak; J A Johnson; F A McAlister; L A Beaupre; D Bellerose; B H Rowe; S R Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Successful implementation of a Fracture Liaison Service through effective change management: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lisa A Wozniak; Lauren A Beaupre; Angela Juby; Paul Kivi; Sumit R Majumdar; Heather M Hanson
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.617

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.