Literature DB >> 21607808

Systematic review on interventions to improve osteoporosis investigation and treatment in fragility fracture patients.

J E M Sale1, D Beaton, J Posen, V Elliot-Gibson, E Bogoch.   

Abstract

This study aims to determine osteoporosis (OP) investigation and treatment within post-fracture initiatives conducted in fracture clinics and other orthopedic environments. A systematic review was conducted. Eligibility criteria were: hip fracture patients plus all other fracture patients presenting with a fragility fracture, orthopedic setting where orthopedic physicians/staff were involved, intervention to improve OP management, primary data on ≥20 patients from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and other study designs. We calculated outcome data within 6 months of screening from an intention-to-treat principle to derive an equated proportion (EP) across interventions. Outcomes were: (1) proportion of patients investigated with bone densitometry, (2) proportion of patients initiating OP medication, and (3) proportion of patients taking OP medication. We identified 2,259 citations, of which 57 articles that included 64 intervention groups were eligible. The median EP for patients investigated was 43% and the 75th percentile was 71%. The median EP for medication initiation was 22% and the 75th percentile was 34%. The median EP for medication taking was 27.5% and the 75th percentile was 43%. The EPs for all outcomes were higher for interventions with dedicated personnel to implement the intervention and those within which bone mineral density testing and/or treatment were included. In studies with an EP, up to 71% of patients were investigated for OP, but <35% initiated medication, and <45% were taking medication within 6 months of screening. Calculating an EP allowed us to compare outcomes across the studies, therefore capturing both RCTs and other study designs typical of real-world settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21607808     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1544-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  67 in total

Review 1.  What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  S Hollis; F Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-11

2.  Bone mineral densitometry substantially influences health-related behaviors of postmenopausal women.

Authors:  C D Marci; W B Anderson; M B Viechnicki; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Medical management of patients over 50 years admitted to orthopedic surgery for low-energy fracture.

Authors:  Régis Levasseur; Jean-Pierre Sabatier; Catherine Guilcher; Geneviève Guaydier-Souquières; Valérie Costentin-Pignol; Pierre-Yves Jean-Jacques; Christophe Hulet; Claude Vielpeau; Christian Marcelli
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment intervention after hip or shoulder fracture. A comparison of two centres in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  A W Murray; C McQuillan; B Kennon; S J Gallacher
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  The inpatient consultation approach to osteoporosis treatment in patients with a fracture. Is automatic consultation needed?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Streeten; Asif Mohamed; Amish Gandhi; Denise Orwig; Paul Sack; Robert Sterling; Vincent D Pellegrini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  First Fracture Project: addressing the osteoporosis care gap.

Authors:  J Vaile; L Sullivan; C Bennett; J Bleasel
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.048

7.  Assessment of inpatient fragility fracture education and outpatient follow-up at an urban tertiary care institution.

Authors:  Richard S Yoon; William Macaulay; Gail Torres; Kate W Nellans; Ethel S Siris; Louis U Bigliani; Carolyn Becker
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.443

8.  Identification of risk factors for future fracture in patients following distal forearm fracture.

Authors:  D Mulherin; S Williams; J A Smith; J Edwards; T P Sheeran; T Price
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Effect of hospitalist consultation on treatment of osteoporosis in hip fracture patients.

Authors:  Carolyn M Jachna; Jeff Whittle; Barbara Lukert; Leland Graves; Tarun Bhargava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Implementation of a mandatory rheumatology osteoporosis consultation in patients with low-impact hip fracture.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Quintos-Macasa; Robert Quinet; Malik Spady; Jerald Zakem; William Davis; Yamini Menon; Leonard Serebro; M A Krousel-Wood
Journal:  J Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.517

View more
  51 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of the Concord Minimal Trauma Fracture Liaison service, a prospective, controlled fracture prevention study.

Authors:  M S Cooper; A J Palmer; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The theory of planned behaviour explains intentions to use antiresorptive medication after a fragility fracture.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Cathy Cameron; Stephen Thielke; Lynn Meadows; Kevin Senior
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Compliance and persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy following initiation within a secondary fracture prevention program: a randomised controlled trial of specialist vs. non-specialist management.

Authors:  K Ganda; A Schaffer; S Pearson; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Bone mineral density testing after fragility fracture: Informative test results likely.

Authors:  Joshua Posen; Dorcas E Beaton; Joanna Sale; Earl R Bogoch
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Closing the gap in postfracture care at the population level: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Lisa LaBine; Penny Klassen; Darlene Dreilich; Patricia A Caetano
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Ganda; M Puech; J S Chen; R Speerin; J Bleasel; J R Center; J A Eisman; L March; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Initiation of osteoporosis assessment in the fracture clinic results in improved osteoporosis management: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J M Queally; C Kiernan; M Shaikh; F Rowan; D Bennett
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Best practices in secondary fracture prevention: fracture liaison services.

Authors:  Paul J Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Cumulative incidence and treatment of non-simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures in a cohort of one thousand two hundred and fifty patients.

Authors:  Paul T P W Burgers; Stephanie M Zielinski; Adinda K E Mailuhu; Martin J Heetveld; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Gert R Roukema; Peter Patka; Rudolf W Poolman; Esther M M Van Lieshout
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Patient perceptions of provider barriers to post-fracture secondary prevention.

Authors:  J E M Sale; E Bogoch; G Hawker; M Gignac; D Beaton; S Jaglal; L Frankel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.