Literature DB >> 17619225

Multivoxel 3D proton MR spectroscopy in the distinction of recurrent glioma from radiation injury.

Qing-Shi Zeng1, Chuan-Fu Li, Kai Zhang, Hong Liu, Xiao-Shui Kang, Jun-Hui Zhen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the usefulness of multivoxel 3D proton MR spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) in assessing the recurrent contrast-enhancing areas at the site of the previously treated gliomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 28 patients who had new contrast-enhancing lesions in the vicinity of the previously resected and irradiated high-grade glioma, 3D (1)H-MRS examinations were performed on a 3.0T MR scanner. Spectral data for N-acetylaspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), and creatine (Cr) were analyzed in all patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and the threshold value for tumor differentiation was determined. Diagnosis of these lesions was assigned by means of histopathology and follow-up.
RESULTS: Diagnostic-quality 3D (1)H-MRS with quantifiable Cho, Cr, and NAA peaks was obtained in 92.9% of the cases. The Cho/NAA and Cho/Cr ratios were significantly higher in recurrent tumor than in radiation injury (P < 0.01), whereas the NAA/Cr ratios were lower in recurrent tumor than in radiation injury (P = 0.02). The Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios were significantly higher in radiation injury than in normal-appearing white matter (P < 0.01), however, the NAA/Cr ratios were lower in radiation injury than in normal-appearing white matter (P = 0.01). Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the resulting sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 3D (1)H-MRS were 94.1%, 100%, and 96.2%, respectively, based on the cut-off values of 1.71 for Cho/Cr or 1.71 for Cho/NAA or both as tumor criterion.
CONCLUSION: 3D (1)H-MRS could differentiate recurrent tumor from radiation injury in patients with recurrent contrast-enhancing lesions in the vicinity of the previously treated gliomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17619225     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-007-9341-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  20 in total

1.  Multivoxel 3D proton spectroscopy in the brain at 1.5 versus 3.0 T: signal-to-noise ratio and resolution comparison.

Authors:  O Gonen; S Gruber; B S Li; V Mlynárik; E Moser
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  SNR versus resolution in 3D 1H MRS of the human brain at high magnetic fields.

Authors:  B S Li; J Regal; O Gonen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  In vivo 3-T MR spectroscopy in the distinction of recurrent glioma versus radiation effects: initial experience.

Authors:  James D Rabinov; Patricia Lani Lee; Frederick G Barker; David N Louis; Griffith R Harsh; G Rees Cosgrove; E Antonio Chiocca; Allan F Thornton; Jay S Loeffler; John W Henson; R Gilberto Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Radiation necrosis versus glioma recurrence: conventional MR imaging clues to diagnosis.

Authors:  Mark E Mullins; Glenn D Barest; Pamela W Schaefer; Fred H Hochberg; R Gilberto Gonzalez; Michael H Lev
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Independent predictors of morbidity after image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy: a risk assessment of 270 cases.

Authors:  Matthew J McGirt; Graeme F Woodworth; Alex L Coon; James M Frazier; Eric Amundson; Ira Garonzik; Alessandro Olivi; Jon D Weingart
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of late delayed radiation-induced injury of the brain.

Authors:  Y L Chan; D K Yeung; S F Leung; G Cao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  H P Schlemmer; P Bachert; K K Herfarth; I Zuna; J Debus; G van Kaick
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  201Thallium SPECT and 1H-MRS compared with MRI in chemotherapy monitoring of high-grade malignant astrocytomas.

Authors:  K Kallén; I M Burtscher; S Holtås; E Ryding; I Rosén
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  123I-IMT SPECT and 1H MR-spectroscopy at 3.0 T in the differential diagnosis of recurrent or residual gliomas: a comparative study.

Authors:  Michail Plotkin; Julia Eisenacher; Harald Bruhn; Reinhard Wurm; Roger Michel; Florian Stockhammer; Annelie Feussner; Oliver Dudeck; Peter Wust; Roland Felix; Holger Amthauer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  [Changes in 1H-MRS in glioma patients before and after irradiation: the significance of quantitative analysis of choline-containing compounds].

Authors:  Tomonori Isobe; Akira Matsumura; Izumi Anno; Yasushi Nagatomo; Takashi Yoshizawa; Yuji Itai; Tadao Nose
Journal:  No Shinkei Geka       Date:  2003-02
View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of imaging biomarkers. Part 3. The neuro-oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  A Shenoy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Multimodality Brain Tumor Imaging: MR Imaging, PET, and PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  James R Fink; Mark Muzi; Melinda Peck; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Molecular imaging of gliomas with PET: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Christian la Fougère; Bogdana Suchorska; Peter Bartenstein; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Jörg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  The Role of Standard and Advanced Imaging for the Management of Brain Malignancies From a Radiation Oncology Standpoint.

Authors:  Robert H Press; Jim Zhong; Saumya S Gurbani; Brent D Weinberg; Bree R Eaton; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui-Kuo G Shu
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 5.  New advances that enable identification of glioblastoma recurrence.

Authors:  Isaac Yang; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme versus radiation injury: a multiparametric 3-T MR approach.

Authors:  Alfonso Di Costanzo; Tommaso Scarabino; Francesca Trojsi; Teresa Popolizio; Simona Bonavita; Mario de Cristofaro; Renata Conforti; Adriana Cristofano; Claudio Colonnese; Ugo Salvolini; Gioacchino Tedeschi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  Differentiating tumor recurrence from treatment necrosis: a review of neuro-oncologic imaging strategies.

Authors:  Nishant Verma; Matthew C Cowperthwaite; Mark G Burnett; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 8.  An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Katherine M Mullen; Raymond Y Huang
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Brain irradiation: effects on normal brain parenchyma and radiation injury.

Authors:  Pia C Sundgren; Yue Cao
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Distinction between glioma progression and post-radiation change by combined physiologic MR imaging.

Authors:  Eiji Matsusue; James R Fink; Jason K Rockhill; Toshihide Ogawa; Kenneth R Maravilla
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.