Literature DB >> 21757446

Molecular imaging of gliomas with PET: opportunities and limitations.

Christian la Fougère1, Bogdana Suchorska, Peter Bartenstein, Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth, Jörg-Christian Tonn.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging enables the noninvasive evaluation of glioma and is considered to be one of the key factors for individualized therapy and patient management, since accurate diagnosis and demarcation of viable tumor tissue is required for treatment planning as well as assessment of treatment response. Conventional imaging techniques like MRI and CT reveal morphological information but are of limited value for the assessment of more specific and reproducible information about biology and activity of the tumor. Molecular imaging with PET is increasingly implemented in neuro-oncology, since it provides additional metabolic information of the tumor, both for patient management as well as for evaluation of newly developed therapeutics. Different molecular processes have been proposed to be useful, like glucose consumption, expression of amino acid transporters, proliferation rate, membrane biosynthesis, and hypoxia. Thus, PET might help neuro-oncologists gain further insights into tumor biology by "true molecular imaging" as well as understand treatment-related phenomena. This review describes the method of PET acquisition as well as the tracers used to image biological processes in gliomas. Furthermore, it considers the clinical impact of PET on the use of currently available radiotracers, which were shown to be potentially valuable for discrimination between neoplastic and nonneoplastic tissue, as well as on tumor grading, determinination of treatment response, and providing an outlook toward further developments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21757446      PMCID: PMC3145468          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nor054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  119 in total

1.  MRI in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy.

Authors:  W B Pope; A Lai; P Nghiemphu; P Mischel; T F Cloughesy
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  18F-FET PET differentiation of ring-enhancing brain lesions.

Authors:  Frank W Floeth; Dirk Pauleit; Michael Sabel; Guido Reifenberger; Gabriele Stoffels; Walter Stummer; Frank Rommel; Kurt Hamacher; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Early change in glucose metabolic rate measured using FDG-PET in patients with high-grade glioma predicts response to temozolomide but not temozolomide plus radiotherapy.

Authors:  Natalie Charnley; Catharine M West; Carolyn M Barnett; Catherine Brock; Graeme M Bydder; Mark Glaser; Ed S Newlands; Ric Swindell; Julian Matthews; Pat Price
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  18F-fluoro-L-thymidine and 11C-methylmethionine as markers of increased transport and proliferation in brain tumors.

Authors:  Andreas H Jacobs; Anne Thomas; Lutz W Kracht; Huongfeng Li; Claus Dittmar; Guido Garlip; Norbert Galldiks; Johannes C Klein; Jan Sobesky; Rüdiger Hilker; Stefan Vollmar; Karl Herholz; Klaus Wienhard; Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Prognostic value of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET and MRI in low-grade glioma.

Authors:  Frank W Floeth; Dirk Pauleit; Michael Sabel; Gabriele Stoffels; Guido Reifenberger; Markus J Riemenschneider; Paul Jansen; Heinz H Coenen; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Correlation of amino-acid uptake using methionine PET and histological classifications in various gliomas.

Authors:  Kenji Torii; Naohiro Tsuyuguchi; Joji Kawabe; Ichiro Sunada; Mitsuhiro Hara; Susumu Shiomi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.668

7.  18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Daniel H S Silverman; Sibylle Delaloye; Johannes Czernin; Nirav Kamdar; Whitney Pope; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Christiaan Schiepers; Timothy Cloughesy
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Correlation of hypoxic cell fraction and angiogenesis with glucose metabolic rate in gliomas using 18F-fluoromisonidazole, 18F-FDG PET, and immunohistochemical studies.

Authors:  Lawrence M Cher; Carmel Murone; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Shanker Ramdave; Anthony Papenfuss; Anthony Hannah; Graeme J O'Keefe; John I Sachinidis; Salvatore U Berlangieri; Gavin Fabinyi; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Survival rates and patterns of care for patients diagnosed with supratentorial low-grade gliomas: data from the SEER program, 1973-2001.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Claus; Peter M Black
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Serial O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L: -tyrosine PET for monitoring the effects of intracavitary radioimmunotherapy in patients with malignant glioma.

Authors:  Gabriele Pöpperl; Claudia Götz; Walter Rachinger; Oliver Schnell; Franz J Gildehaus; Joerg C Tonn; Klaus Tatsch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  96 in total

1.  MRI-suspected low-grade glioma: is there a need to perform dynamic FET PET?

Authors:  Nathalie L Jansen; Vera Graute; Lena Armbruster; Bogdana Suchorska; Juergen Lutz; Sabina Eigenbrod; Paul Cumming; Peter Bartenstein; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Friedrich Wilhelm Kreth; Christian la Fougère
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Hybrid MR-PET in Neuroimaging.

Authors:  S Bisdas; C Lá Fougere; U Ernemann
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Early static (18)F-FET-PET scans have a higher accuracy for glioma grading than the standard 20-40 min scans.

Authors:  Nathalie L Albert; Isabel Winkelmann; Bogdana Suchorska; Vera Wenter; Christine Schmid-Tannwald; Erik Mille; Andrei Todica; Matthias Brendel; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Peter Bartenstein; Christian la Fougère
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas.

Authors:  Nathalie L Albert; Michael Weller; Bogdana Suchorska; Norbert Galldiks; Riccardo Soffietti; Michelle M Kim; Christian la Fougère; Whitney Pope; Ian Law; Javier Arbizu; Marc C Chamberlain; Michael Vogelbaum; Ben M Ellingson; Joerg C Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Current status and future role of brain PET/MRI in clinical and research settings.

Authors:  P Werner; H Barthel; A Drzezga; O Sabri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Potential role for magnetoencephalography in distinguishing low- and high-grade gliomas: a preliminary study with histopathological confirmation.

Authors:  Tony W Wilson; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Michele R Aizenberg
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  Clinical Imaging for Diagnostic Challenges in the Management of Gliomas: A Review.

Authors:  Alipi V Bonm; Reed Ritterbusch; Patrick Throckmorton; Jerome J Graber
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Imaging and diagnostic advances for intracranial meningiomas.

Authors:  Raymond Y Huang; Wenya Linda Bi; Brent Griffith; Timothy J Kaufmann; Christian la Fougère; Nils Ole Schmidt; Jöerg C Tonn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Patrick Y Wen; Kenneth Aldape; Farshad Nassiri; Gelareh Zadeh; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Diagnostic discrepancies in malignant astrocytoma due to limited small pathological tumor sample can be overcome by IDH1 testing.

Authors:  Betty Y S Kim; Wen Jiang; Jason Beiko; Sujit S Prabhu; Franco DeMonte; Mark R Gilbert; Raymond Sawaya; Kenneth D Aldape; Daniel P Cahill; Ian E McCutcheon
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  The biology and mathematical modelling of glioma invasion: a review.

Authors:  J C L Alfonso; K Talkenberger; M Seifert; B Klink; A Hawkins-Daarud; K R Swanson; H Hatzikirou; A Deutsch
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.