Literature DB >> 19834699

Distinction between glioma progression and post-radiation change by combined physiologic MR imaging.

Eiji Matsusue1, James R Fink, Jason K Rockhill, Toshihide Ogawa, Kenneth R Maravilla.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion imaging (DSC), and MR spectroscopy (MRS) techniques provide specific physiologic information that may distinguish malignant glioma progression from post-radiation change, yet no single technique is completely reliable. We propose a simple, multiparametric scoring system to improve diagnostic accuracy beyond that of each technique alone.
METHODS: Fifteen subjects with lesions suspicious for glioma progression following radiation therapy who had also undergone 3-tesla DWI, DSC, and MRS studies of the lesion were retrospectively reviewed. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratio, maximum regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) ratio, and maximum MRS choline/creatine (Cho/Cr) and choline/N-acetyl-aspartate (Cho/NAA) metabolic peak-height ratios were quantified within each lesion. Each parameter (ADC ratio, rCBV ratio, and combined Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios) was scored as either glioma progression (one point) or radiation change (zero point) based upon thresholds derived from our own data. For each lesion, the combined parameters yielded a multiparametric score (0 to 3) for prediction of tumor progression or post-radiation change.
RESULTS: Optimum thresholds for ADC ratio (1.30), rCBV ratio (2.10), and either combined Cho/Cr (1.29) and Cho/NAA (1.06) yielded diagnostic accuracies of 86.7%, 86.7%, and 84.6%, respectively (p < 0.05). A combined multiparametric score threshold of 2 improved diagnostic accuracy to 93.3% (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In this small series combining 3-T DWI, DSC, and MRS diagnostic results using a simple, multiparametric scoring system has potential to improve overall diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing glioma progression from post-radiation change beyond that of each technique alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19834699     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-009-0613-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  23 in total

1.  Rapid three-dimensional MR imaging method for tracking a bolus of contrast agent through the brain.

Authors:  P van Gelderen; C Grandin; J R Petrella; C T Moonen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Radiation necrosis versus glioma recurrence: conventional MR imaging clues to diagnosis.

Authors:  Mark E Mullins; Glenn D Barest; Pamela W Schaefer; Fred H Hochberg; R Gilberto Gonzalez; Michael H Lev
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of radiation-induced brain injury for differentiation from tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Chiaki Asao; Yukunori Korogi; Mika Kitajima; Toshinori Hirai; Yuji Baba; Keishi Makino; Masato Kochi; Shoji Morishita; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  A functional MRI technique combining principles of echo-shifting with a train of observations (PRESTO).

Authors:  G Liu; G Sobering; J Duyn; C T Moonen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose.

Authors:  Christoph Manka; Frank Träber; Juergen Gieseke; Hans H Schild; Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Perfusion-sensitive MR imaging of gliomas: comparison between gradient-echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging techniques.

Authors:  T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; Y Ushio; M Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  H P Schlemmer; P Bachert; K K Herfarth; I Zuna; J Debus; G van Kaick
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  123I-IMT SPECT and 1H MR-spectroscopy at 3.0 T in the differential diagnosis of recurrent or residual gliomas: a comparative study.

Authors:  Michail Plotkin; Julia Eisenacher; Harald Bruhn; Reinhard Wurm; Roger Michel; Florian Stockhammer; Annelie Feussner; Oliver Dudeck; Peter Wust; Roland Felix; Holger Amthauer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  [Usefulness of Cho/Cr ratio in proton MR spectroscopy for differentiating residual/recurrent glioma from non-neoplastic lesions].

Authors:  Kumiko Ando; Reiichi Ishikura; Yuki Nagami; Tsutomu Morikawa; Yoshihiro Takada; Jota Ikeda; Norio Nakao; Tsuyoshi Matsumoto; Norio Arita
Journal:  Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2004-03

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced T2-weighted MR imaging of recurrent malignant gliomas treated with thalidomide and carboplatin.

Authors:  S Cha; E A Knopp; G Johnson; A Litt; J Glass; M L Gruber; S Lu; D Zagzag
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.966

View more
  54 in total

Review 1.  Applications of imaging technology in radiation research.

Authors:  MingDe Lin; Edward F Jackson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  Physiologic MRI for assessment of response to therapy and prognosis in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Mark S Shiroishi; Jerrold L Boxerman; Whitney B Pope
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  MRI and thallium-201 SPECT in the prediction of survival in glioma.

Authors:  Maaike J Vos; Johannes Berkhof; Otto S Hoekstra; Ingeborg Bosma; Eefje M Sizoo; Jan J Heimans; Jaap C Reijneveld; Esther Sanchez; Frank J Lagerwaard; Jan Buter; David P Noske; Tjeerd J Postma
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme versus radiation injury: a multiparametric 3-T MR approach.

Authors:  Alfonso Di Costanzo; Tommaso Scarabino; Francesca Trojsi; Teresa Popolizio; Simona Bonavita; Mario de Cristofaro; Renata Conforti; Adriana Cristofano; Claudio Colonnese; Ugo Salvolini; Gioacchino Tedeschi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Advanced MRI Techniques in the Monitoring of Treatment of Gliomas.

Authors:  Harpreet Hyare; Steffi Thust; Jeremy Rees
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 6.  Current concepts and challenges in the radiologic assessment of brain tumors in children: part 2.

Authors:  Benita Tamrazi; Kshitij Mankad; Marvin Nelson; Felice D'Arco
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-09-13

Review 7.  Differentiating tumor recurrence from treatment necrosis: a review of neuro-oncologic imaging strategies.

Authors:  Nishant Verma; Matthew C Cowperthwaite; Mark G Burnett; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 8.  Clinical Imaging for Diagnostic Challenges in the Management of Gliomas: A Review.

Authors:  Alipi V Bonm; Reed Ritterbusch; Patrick Throckmorton; Jerome J Graber
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  MRS as an Aid to Diagnose Malignant Transformation in Low-Grade Gliomas with Increasing Contrast Enhancement.

Authors:  C H Toh; M Castillo; K-C Wei; P-Y Chen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Post-treatment imaging changes in primary brain tumors.

Authors:  Barbara J O'Brien; Rivka R Colen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.