Literature DB >> 10894370

201Thallium SPECT and 1H-MRS compared with MRI in chemotherapy monitoring of high-grade malignant astrocytomas.

K Kallén1, I M Burtscher, S Holtås, E Ryding, I Rosén.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare chemotherapy treatment monitoring in astrocytoma by 201thallium single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and photon magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to evaluate the influence of morphological tumor changes on cerebral 201thallium uptake and metabolic changes in 1H-MRS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with highly malignant astrocytomas were followed with quantitative 201thallium SPECT, MRI, and 1H-MRS during chemotherapy. Maximum follow-up included six examinations per patient by either method during 18 months. Criteria were set for: (1) regression (> or = 25% tumor reduction), (2) status quo (< 25% reduction and < 25% increase), and (3) progression of disease (> or = 25% tumor increase). Results were compared with the clinical state of disease. Changes of tumor volume, contrast enhancement, necrosis, hemorrhage and edema on MRI were compared to changes in 201thallium uptake volumes and 1H-MRS metabolite ratios.
RESULTS: Six patients were followed with a total of twenty-four examinations with 201thallium SPECT, MRI and 1H-MRS, respectively, between February 1997 and October 1998. Five patients developed clinical progression of disease, 4 out of 5 cases showed SPECT progression, 4 out of 5 cases MRI progression, and 1 out of 2 interpretable cases 1H-MRS progression at final assessment before clinical deterioration. During the phase of clinically stable disease; (A) the criterion for regression or status quo was met in 10 out of 13 assessments with SPECT, 11 out of 13 with MRI, and 8 out of 9 interpretable 1H-MRS; (B) the criterion for progression was met in 3 out of 13 with SPECT, 2 out of 13 with MRI, and 1 out of 9 interpretable 1H-MRS. The accuracy of SPECT, MRI, and 1H-MRS in identifying changes of tumor burden concordant with patients' clinical course was 78%, 83%, and 82%, respectively. SPECT regression was associated with MRI decrease of tumor size, contrast enhancement, edema and hemorrhage. SPECT progression was associated with MRI increase of the same parameters and the increase of necrosis. 1H-MRS regression was associated with decrease of edema. 1H-MRS progression was associated with increase of tumor size, hemorrhage, and increase or decrease of contrast enhancement.
CONCLUSIONS: Both 201thallium SPECT and 1H-MRS evaluation showed sensitivity for detection of astrocytoma progression. We did not find a higher accuracy of SPECT or MRS than of MRI in astrocytoma chemotherapy monitoring. Treatment induced MRI changes were associated with 201thallium uptake variations. 1H-MRS was difficult to apply for astrocytoma treatment monitoring. Improvements regarding size of measurement area such as multivoxel MRS and fat suppression pulses appeared desirable, and also the use of functional techniques with superior resolution such as dual isotope SPECT. However, our results suggest that 201thallium SPECT and 1H-MRS can provide additional information to MRI for chemotherapy efficacy evaluation in selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10894370     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006429329677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  36 in total

Review 1.  Complexities, pitfalls, and strategies for evaluating brain tumor therapies.

Authors:  R S Kaplan
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.645

2.  Thallium-201 SPECT imaging of brain tumors: methods and results.

Authors:  K T Kim; K L Black; D Marciano; J C Mazziotta; B H Guze; S Grafton; R A Hawkins; D P Becker
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Brain tumor therapy: new horizons, new hope.

Authors:  L M DeAngelis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Imaging of gliomas.

Authors:  T N Byrne
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Postoperative contrast enhancement in patients with brain tumor.

Authors:  J G Cairncross; J H Pexman; M P Rathbone; R F DelMaestro
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Evaluation of malignancy in ring enhancing brain lesions on CT by thallium-201 SPECT.

Authors:  K Källén; M Heiling; A M Andersson; A Brun; S Holtås; E Ryding; I Rosén
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  The effect of steroid on thallium-201 uptake by malignant gliomas.

Authors:  H Namba; T Togawa; N Yui; M Yanagisawa; F Kinoshita; Y Iwadate; K Ohsato; K Sueyoshi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-08

8.  Clinical usefulness of 11C-MET PET and 201T1 SPECT for differentiation of recurrent glioma from radiation necrosis.

Authors:  Y Sonoda; T Kumabe; T Takahashi; R Shirane; T Yoshimoto
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Treatment of brain tumors in children is associated with abnormal MR spectroscopic ratios in brain tissue remote from the tumor site.

Authors:  S M Waldrop; P C Davis; C A Padgett; M B Shapiro; R Morris
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Malignant glioma: who benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy?

Authors:  L M DeAngelis; P C Burger; S B Green; J G Cairncross
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  8 in total

1.  Glioma residual or recurrence versus radiation necrosis: accuracy of pentavalent technetium-99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid [Tc-99m (V) DMSA] brain SPECT compared to proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS): initial results.

Authors:  Amr Amin; Hosna Moustafa; Ebaa Ahmed; Mohamed El-Toukhy
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Thallium-201 SPECT: the optimal prediction of response in glioma therapy.

Authors:  Maaike J Vos; Johannes Berkhof; Tjeerd J Postma; Otto S Hoekstra; Frederik Barkhof; Jan J Heimans
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  123I-IMT SPECT and 1H MR-spectroscopy at 3.0 T in the differential diagnosis of recurrent or residual gliomas: a comparative study.

Authors:  Michail Plotkin; Julia Eisenacher; Harald Bruhn; Reinhard Wurm; Roger Michel; Florian Stockhammer; Annelie Feussner; Oliver Dudeck; Peter Wust; Roland Felix; Holger Amthauer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Use of 201Tl SPECT imaging to assess the response to therapy in patients with high grade gliomas.

Authors:  V Vallejos; C Balaña; M Fraile; Y Roussos; J Capellades; P Cuadras; R Ballester; A Ley; A Arellano; R Rosell
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Perioperative single photon emission computed tomography in predicting survival of malignant glioma patients.

Authors:  Vytenis Deltuva; Adomas Bunevicius; Nemira Jurkiene; Ilona Kulakiene; Arimantas Tamasauskas
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  The role of SPET and PET in monitoring tumour response to therapy.

Authors:  Chariklia Giannopoulou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Multivoxel 3D proton MR spectroscopy in the distinction of recurrent glioma from radiation injury.

Authors:  Qing-Shi Zeng; Chuan-Fu Li; Kai Zhang; Hong Liu; Xiao-Shui Kang; Jun-Hui Zhen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Integration method of 3D MR spectroscopy into treatment planning system for glioblastoma IMRT dose painting with integrated simultaneous boost.

Authors:  Soléakhéna Ken; Laure Vieillevigne; Xavier Franceries; Luc Simon; Caroline Supper; Jean-Albert Lotterie; Thomas Filleron; Vincent Lubrano; Isabelle Berry; Emmanuelle Cassol; Martine Delannes; Pierre Celsis; Elizabeth Moyal Cohen-Jonathan; Anne Laprie
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.