BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The radiologic assessment of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy of brain tumors is difficult. The purpose of our study was to define parameters from single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy that provide a probability measure for differentiating neoplastic from radiation-induced, nonneoplastic lesions. METHODS: Seventy-two lesions in 56 patients were examined using a combined MR imaging and MR spectroscopy protocol (point-resolved spectroscopy, TE = 135 ms). Signal intensities of cholines, creatines, N-acetyl aspartate, and the presence of lactate and lipid resonances were correlated to final diagnoses established by clinical and MR imaging follow-up, positron emission tomography studies, or biopsy/surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test, linear discriminant analysis, and k nearest-neighbor method. RESULTS: Significantly increased signal intensity ratios I(tCho)/I(tCr) (P <.0001) and I(tCho)/I(NAA) (P <.0001) were observed in neoplastic (n = 34) compared with nonneoplastic lesions (n = 32) and contralateral normal brain (n = 33). Analysis of I(tCho)/I(tCr) and I(tCho)/I(NAA) data yielded correct retrospective classification as neoplastic and nonneoplastic in 82% and 81% of the lesions, respectively. Neither I(NAA)/I(tCr) nor signal intensitities of lactate or lipids were useful for differential diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Metabolic information provided by proton MR spectroscopy is useful for the differentiation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy of brain tumors.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The radiologic assessment of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy of brain tumors is difficult. The purpose of our study was to define parameters from single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy that provide a probability measure for differentiating neoplastic from radiation-induced, nonneoplastic lesions. METHODS: Seventy-two lesions in 56 patients were examined using a combined MR imaging and MR spectroscopy protocol (point-resolved spectroscopy, TE = 135 ms). Signal intensities of cholines, creatines, N-acetyl aspartate, and the presence of lactate and lipid resonances were correlated to final diagnoses established by clinical and MR imaging follow-up, positron emission tomography studies, or biopsy/surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test, linear discriminant analysis, and k nearest-neighbor method. RESULTS: Significantly increased signal intensity ratios I(tCho)/I(tCr) (P <.0001) and I(tCho)/I(NAA) (P <.0001) were observed in neoplastic (n = 34) compared with nonneoplastic lesions (n = 32) and contralateral normal brain (n = 33). Analysis of I(tCho)/I(tCr) and I(tCho)/I(NAA) data yielded correct retrospective classification as neoplastic and nonneoplastic in 82% and 81% of the lesions, respectively. Neither I(NAA)/I(tCr) nor signal intensitities of lactate or lipids were useful for differential diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Metabolic information provided by proton MR spectroscopy is useful for the differentiation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy of brain tumors.
Authors: L L Wald; S J Nelson; M R Day; S E Noworolski; R G Henry; S L Huhn; S Chang; M D Prados; P K Sneed; D A Larson; W M Wara; M McDermott; W P Dillon; P H Gutin; D B Vigneron Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: S J Nelson; S Huhn; D B Vigneron; M R Day; L L Wald; M Prados; S Chang; P H Gutin; P K Sneed; L Verhey; R A Hawkins; W P Dillon Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1997 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: S D Rand; R Prost; V Haughton; L Mark; J Strainer; J Johansen; T A Kim; V K Chetty; W Mueller; G Meyer; H Krouwer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: H G Krouwer; T A Kim; S D Rand; R W Prost; V M Haughton; K C Ho; S S Jaradeh; G A Meyer; K A Blindauer; J F Cusick; G L Morris; P R Walsh Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Rajan Jain; Jayant Narang; Pia M Sundgren; David Hearshen; Sona Saksena; Jack P Rock; Jorge Gutierrez; Tom Mikkelsen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: John H Rossmeisl; Paulo A Garcia; Gregory B Daniel; John Daniel Bourland; Waldemar Debinski; Nikolaos Dervisis; Shawna Klahn Journal: Vet Radiol Ultrasound Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 1.363
Authors: Vaios Hatzoglou; Gary A Ulaner; Zhigang Zhang; Kathryn Beal; Andrei I Holodny; Robert J Young Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 1.605
Authors: Eiji Matsusue; James R Fink; Jason K Rockhill; Toshihide Ogawa; Kenneth R Maravilla Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 2.804