Literature DB >> 17619195

Gray matter-white matter contrast on spin-echo T1-weighted images at 3 T and 1.5 T: a quantitative comparison study.

Yasutaka Fushimi1, Yukio Miki, Shin-Ichi Urayama, Tsutomu Okada, Nobuyuki Mori, Takashi Hanakawa, Hidenao Fukuyama, Kaori Togashi.   

Abstract

Discrepancies exist in the literature regarding contrast between gray and white matter on spin-echo (SE) T1-weighted MR imaging at 3 T. The present study quantitatively assessed differences in gray matter-white matter contrast on both single- and multi-slice SE T1-weighted imaging between 3 and 1.5 T. SE T1-weighted sequences with the same parameters at both 3 and 1.5 T were used. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between gray and white matter (CNR(GM-WM)) was evaluated for both frontal lobes. To assess the effects of interslice gap, multi-slice images were obtained with both 0 and 25% interslice gap. Single-slice CNR(GM-WM) was higher at 3 T (17.66 +/- 2.68) than at 1.5 T (13.09 +/- 2.35; P < 0.001). No significant difference in CNR(GM-WM) of multi-slice images with 0% gap was noted between 3 and 1.5 T (3T, 8.61 +/- 2.55; 1.5T, 7.43 +/- 1.20; P > 0.05). Multi-slice CNR(GM-WM) with 25% gap was higher at 3T (12.47 +/- 3.31) than at 1.5 T (9.73 +/- 1.37; P < 0.001). CNR(GM-WM) reduction rate of multi-slice images with 0% gap compared with single-slice images was higher at 3T (0.47 +/- 0.13) than at 1.5 T (0.38 +/- 0.09; P = 0.02). CNR(GM-WM) on single-slice SE T1-weighted imaging and CNR(GM-WM) on multi-slice images with 25% interslice gap were better at 3 T than at 1.5 T. The influence of multi-slice imaging on CNR(GM-WM) was significantly larger at 3T than at 1.5 T.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17619195     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0688-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  21 in total

1.  High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience.

Authors:  M A Bernstein; J Huston; C Lin; G F Gibbs; J P Felmlee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in head images.

Authors:  J T Vaughan; M Garwood; C M Collins; W Liu; L DelaBarre; G Adriany; P Andersen; H Merkle; R Goebel; M B Smith; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  3.0 Tesla MR systems.

Authors:  Ewald Moser; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  The high-field-strength curmudgeon.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Ross
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Contrast, resolution, and detectability in MR imaging.

Authors:  R T Constable; R M Henkelman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 6.  High-field MRI of the central nervous system: current approaches to clinical and microscopic imaging.

Authors:  Makoto Sasaki; Takashi Inoue; Koujiro Tohyama; Hirobumi Oikawa; Shigeru Ehara; Akira Ogawa
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Routine clinical brain MRI sequences for use at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Hanzhang Lu; Lidia M Nagae-Poetscher; Xavier Golay; Doris Lin; Martin Pomper; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Contrast and accuracy of relaxation time measurements in acquired and synthesized multislice magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  S Majumdar; H D Sostman; J R MacFall
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Functional 3.0-T MR assessment of higher cognitive function: are there advantages over 1.5-T imaging?

Authors:  Klaus Hoenig; Christiane K Kuhl; Lukas Scheef
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose.

Authors:  Christoph Manka; Frank Träber; Juergen Gieseke; Hans H Schild; Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  10 in total

1.  Combining atlas-based parcellation of regional brain data acquired across scanners at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths.

Authors:  Adolf Pfefferbaum; Torsten Rohlfing; Margaret J Rosenbloom; Edith V Sullivan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Medial orbitofrontal cortex gray matter is reduced in abstinent substance-dependent individuals.

Authors:  Jody Tanabe; Jason R Tregellas; Manish Dalwani; Laetitia Thompson; Elizabeth Owens; Thomas Crowley; Marie Banich
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Hyperintense Dentate Nuclei on T1-Weighted MRI: Relation to Repeat Gadolinium Administration.

Authors:  M E Adin; L Kleinberg; D Vaidya; E Zan; S Mirbagheri; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  The impact of intraoperative magnetic resonance in routine pediatric neurosurgical practice-a 6-year appraisal.

Authors:  Sonia Tejada; Shivaram Avula; Benedetta Pettorini; Dawn Henningan; Laurence Abernethy; Conor Mallucci
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Effect Modifiers of TDP-43-Associated Hippocampal Atrophy Rates in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease Neuropathological Changes.

Authors:  Marina Buciuc; Alexandra M Wennberg; Stephen D Weigand; Melissa E Murray; Matthew L Senjem; Anthony J Spychalla; Bradley F Boeve; David S Knopman; Clifford R Jack; Kejal Kantarci; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson; Ronald C Petersen; Jennifer L Whitwell; Keith A Josephs
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

6.  Comparing 3T and 1.5T MRI for mapping hippocampal atrophy in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.

Authors:  N Chow; K S Hwang; S Hurtz; A E Green; J H Somme; P M Thompson; D A Elashoff; C R Jack; M Weiner; L G Apostolova
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Variation in longitudinal trajectories of regional brain volumes of healthy men and women (ages 10 to 85 years) measured with atlas-based parcellation of MRI.

Authors:  Adolf Pfefferbaum; Torsten Rohlfing; Margaret J Rosenbloom; Weiwei Chu; Ian M Colrain; Edith V Sullivan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Comparison of structural MRI brain measures between 1.5 and 3 T: Data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.

Authors:  Colin R Buchanan; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Maria C Valdés Hernández; Lucia Ballerini; Gayle Barclay; Adele M Taylor; Tom C Russ; Elliot M Tucker-Drob; Joanna M Wardlaw; Ian J Deary; Mark E Bastin; Simon R Cox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.399

9.  MR-based age-related effects on the striatum, globus pallidus, and thalamus in healthy individuals across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Stephanie Tullo; Raihaan Patel; Gabriel A Devenyi; Alyssa Salaciak; Saashi A Bedford; Sarah Farzin; Nancy Wlodarski; Christine L Tardif; John C S Breitner; M Mallar Chakravarty
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  The clinical utility of fMRI for identifying covert awareness in the vegetative state: a comparison of sensitivity between 3T and 1.5T.

Authors:  Davinia Fernández-Espejo; Loretta Norton; Adrian M Owen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.