Literature DB >> 15650039

Functional 3.0-T MR assessment of higher cognitive function: are there advantages over 1.5-T imaging?

Klaus Hoenig1, Christiane K Kuhl, Lukas Scheef.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare cortical activation patterns associated with manual motor decision tasks at 1.5- and 3.0-T functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local ethics committee approved this study, and informed written consent was obtained. Ten right-handed healthy volunteers (eight men and two women; mean age, 35 years +/- 7 [standard deviation]) underwent functional MR imaging twice, once at 1.5 T and once at 3.0 T, while performing cognitive tasks that demanded manual motor decisions (letter-finger matching and lexical and semantic decisions). While stimulus presentation was blocked, an event-related model was employed to analyze subjects' individual responses. A group analysis of functional data was performed with a t test of 1.5- and 3.0-T results in the 10 subjects.
RESULTS: Manual motor decisions activated a widespread network of motor- (primary motor, posterior parietal) and decision-related areas (superior frontal cortex or anterior cingulate) at both field strengths (P <.05, corrected). Moreover, additional functional activation was detected in medial (supplementary motor area) and dorsal premotor regions (P <.05, corrected) at 3.0-T functional MR imaging, which was not detectable with corresponding 1.5-T imaging. The mean t value for peak voxels in activated areas detectable with both systems was 1.3 times larger at 3.0 T than that at 1.5 T.
CONCLUSION: Functional 3.0-T MR imaging allows detection of additional activation in cortical areas involved in higher executive motor functions compared with functional 1.5-T MR imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15650039     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2343031565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  Ultra-high field parallel imaging of the superior parietal lobule during mental maze solving.

Authors:  Trenton A Jerde; Scott M Lewis; Ute Goerke; Pavlos Gourtzelidis; Charidimos Tzagarakis; Joshua Lynch; Steen Moeller; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Jeran Trangle; Kâmil Uğurbil; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Functional BOLD MRI: comparison of different field strengths in a motor task.

Authors:  T Meindl; C Born; S Britsch; M Reiser; S Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Neurological Soft Signs and Brain Network Abnormalities in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Li Kong; Christina J Herold; Eric F C Cheung; Raymond C K Chan; Johannes Schröder
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 4.  Preoperative fMRI in tumour surgery.

Authors:  Ann Tieleman; Karel Deblaere; Dirk Van Roost; Olivier Van Damme; Eric Achten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Gray matter-white matter contrast on spin-echo T1-weighted images at 3 T and 1.5 T: a quantitative comparison study.

Authors:  Yasutaka Fushimi; Yukio Miki; Shin-Ichi Urayama; Tsutomu Okada; Nobuyuki Mori; Takashi Hanakawa; Hidenao Fukuyama; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  A Probabilistic Atlas of the Pineal Gland in the Standard Space.

Authors:  Foroogh Razavi; Samira Raminfard; Hadis Kalantar Hormozi; Minoo Sisakhti; Seyed Amir Hossein Batouli
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.081

7.  Preoperative evaluation with FMRI of patients with intracranial gliomas.

Authors:  Ioannis Z Kapsalakis; Eftychia Z Kapsalaki; Efstathios D Gotsis; Dimitrios Verganelakis; Panagiotis Toulas; Georgios Hadjigeorgiou; Indug Chung; Ioannis Fezoulidis; Alexandros Papadimitriou; Joe Sam Robinson; Gregory P Lee; Kostas N Fountas
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-07-12

8.  Sensitivity to white matter FMRI activation increases with field strength.

Authors:  Erin L Mazerolle; Jodie R Gawryluk; Kim N H Dillen; Steven A Patterson; Kirk W Feindel; Steven D Beyea; M Tynan R Stevens; Aaron J Newman; Matthias H Schmidt; Ryan C N D'Arcy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.