Literature DB >> 17618430

MRI as a problem-solving tool in unexplained failed total hip replacement following conventional assessment.

Ciaran Johnston1, Jennifer Kerr, Stephanie Ford, John O'byrne, Stephen Eustace.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate MRI as a problem-solving tool for patients with an unexplained failed total hip replacement following conventional radiological assessment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients' informed consent was obtained in all cases. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Twenty-eight patients with unexplained failed total hip replacements following conventional radiological assessment underwent additional MR imaging with an optimised turbo-spin echo sequence. Images were reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists by consensus and compared with findings at surgery, or following response to image-guided intervention or clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: Of the 28 patients, MRI revealed an unsuspected diagnosis explaining the cause of prosthesis failure in 15 patients. In eight of 15 patients in this group, subsequent minimally invasive image-guided intervention obviated the need for revision total hip replacement. No cause for prosthesis failure was identified in 13 patients. DISCUSSION: MRI may be successfully undertaken in patients following total hip replacement, and, when performed, it frequently leads to an unsuspected diagnosis, allowing informed patient treatment. In this study it allowed the identification of an unsuspected diagnosis in over 50% of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17618430     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-007-0349-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  20 in total

1.  Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience.

Authors:  L M White; J K Kim; M Mehta; N Merchant; M E Schweitzer; W B Morrison; C R Hutchison; A E Gross
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative hip.

Authors:  C Czerny; C Krestan; H Imhof; S Trattnig
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-08

3.  Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications.

Authors:  R V Olsen; P L Munk; M J Lee; D L Janzen; A L MacKay; Q S Xiang; B Masri
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  From the RSNA refresher courses. Total hip arthroplasty: radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  B J Manaster
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 5.  Imaging of total hip replacement.

Authors:  B N Weissman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  An international comparative study of total hip arthroplasty cost and practice patterns.

Authors:  C M Metz; A A Freiberg
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Arthrographic study of painful total hip arthroplasty: refined criteria.

Authors:  T P Maus; T H Berquist; C E Bender; J A Rand
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue.

Authors:  Hollis G Potter; Bryan J Nestor; Carolyn M Sofka; Stephanie T Ho; Lance E Peters; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Nuclear arthrography: combined scintigraphic and radiographic procedure for diagnosis of total hip prosthesis loosening.

Authors:  W J Oyen; J A Lemmens; R A Claessens; J R van Horn; T J Slooff; F H Corstens
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Limited effectiveness of sonography in revealing hip joint effusion: preliminary results in 21 adult patients with native and postoperative hips.

Authors:  Patrick N Weybright; Jon A Jacobson; Kristyn H Murry; John Lin; David P Fessell; David A Jamadar; Mohammed Kabeto; Curtis W Hayes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of post-operative complications following hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Douis; D J Dunlop; A M Pearson; J N O'Hara; S L J James
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of painful total hip replacement: detection and characterisation of periprosthetic fluid collection and interobserver reproducibility.

Authors:  A Aliprandi; L M Sconfienza; F Randelli; M Bandirali; G Di Leo; F Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of painful metal-on-metal total hip replacement.

Authors:  Vassilios S Nikolaou; Alain Petit; Viviane Khoury; Etienne Blain-Pare; David J Zukor; Olga L Huk; John Antoniou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-06-07

4.  A MRI classification of periprosthetic soft tissue masses (pseudotumours) associated with metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jennifer Hauptfleisch; Hemant Pandit; George Grammatopoulos; Harinderjit S Gill; David W Murray; Simon Ostlere
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Metal artefact reduction in MRI at both 1.5 and 3.0 T using slice encoding for metal artefact correction and view angle tilting.

Authors:  M Reichert; T Ai; J N Morelli; M Nittka; U Attenberger; V M Runge
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Metal artifact reduction image reconstruction algorithm for CT of implanted metal orthopedic devices: a work in progress.

Authors:  Patrick T Liu; William P Pavlicek; Mary B Peter; Mark J Spangehl; Catherine C Roberts; Robert G Paden
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  [MRI investigations in patients with problems due to metal-on-metal implants].

Authors:  T M Parsons; K Satchithananda; R Berbe; I A Siddiqui; E Robinson; A J Hart; A Hart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Is there a relation between clinical scores and serum ion levels after MoM-THA? One year results in 383 implants.

Authors:  Francesco Pogliacomi; Paolo Schiavi; Filippo Calderazzi; Massimiliano Leigheb; Marco Domenichini; Alessio Pedrazzini; Francesco Ceccarelli; Enrico Vaienti
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-12-30

9.  What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Andrew Judge; Antti Eskelinen; David W Murray; Hemant G Pandit
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.