Literature DB >> 21744254

Magnetic resonance imaging of painful total hip replacement: detection and characterisation of periprosthetic fluid collection and interobserver reproducibility.

A Aliprandi1, L M Sconfienza, F Randelli, M Bandirali, G Di Leo, F Sardanelli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when measuring and characterising periprosthetic fluid collections in patients with painful hip prosthesis and to provide an estimation of interobserver reproducibility.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients (mean age 59±13 years) with painful total hip replacement and clinical suspicion of infection underwent MRI. Images were reviewed blindly by two musculoskeletal radiologists with different levels of experience who evaluated the presence/absence of soft tissue oedema or fluid collection (when present, three-plane maximal diameters were measured; involvement of skin/subcutaneous/deep tissues or prosthesis were estimated; fluid was classified as serous/purulent/haematic according to signal behaviour). Interobserver agreement was calculated (Cohen's ).
RESULTS: A total of 26 MRI studies were carried out (three patients underwent two and two patients underwent three MRI examinations). Both readers detected soft tissue oedema (13/26, 50%) or fluid collection (21/26, 81%) and characterised the fluid as serous (9/21, 43%), purulent (8/21, 38%) or haematic (4/21, 19%). The collection involved skin/subcutaneous tissues (16/21, 76%), deep soft tissues (19/21, 91%) or the implant (12/21, 57%). For all evaluations, interobserver agreement was complete (=1). No significant differences were found between the measurements of the collections (p>0.258).
CONCLUSIONS: MRI is highly reproducible in detection, localisation, quantification, and characterisation of fluid collections when the presence of implant infection is clinically suspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21744254     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0706-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  22 in total

Review 1.  Tissue characterization in the female pelvis by means of MR imaging.

Authors:  E S Siegelman; E K Outwater
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience.

Authors:  L M White; J K Kim; M Mehta; N Merchant; M E Schweitzer; W B Morrison; C R Hutchison; A E Gross
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  MR imaging of the knee in patients with medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: comparison among sequences at 1.5 T.

Authors:  A Aliprandi; F Perona; M Bandirali; P Randelli; P Cabitza; F Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.

Authors:  J S Suh; E K Jeong; K H Shin; J H Cho; J B Na; D H Kim; C D Han
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Hip arthroplasty infection. Current concepts.

Authors:  I Antti-Poika; G Josefsson; Y Konttinen; L Lidgren; S Santavirta; L Sanzén
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1990-04

6.  An assessment of the histological criteria used to diagnose infection in hip revision arthroplasty tissues.

Authors:  R Pandey; E Drakoulakis; N A Athanasou
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  [Computerized tomography assessment of femoral and tibial rotation in total knee prosthesis].

Authors:  E Rimondi; M Molinari; A Moio; M Busacca; F Trentani; P Trentani; D Tigani; M Nigrisoli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Pain measurement: an overview.

Authors:  C R Chapman; K L Casey; R Dubner; K M Foley; R H Gracely; A E Reading
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 9.  Optimizing imaging techniques in the postoperative patient.

Authors:  Kenneth A Buckwalter
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 10.  Classification of hip joint infections.

Authors:  Konstantinos Anagnostakos; Nora Verena Schmid; Jens Kelm; Ulrich Grün; Jochen Jung
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  8 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artefacts in hip prostheses: a comparison of different prosthetic compositions.

Authors:  Elisabetta Panfili; Laura Pierdicca; Luca Salvolini; Luigi Imperiale; Jeffrey Dubbini; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of post-operative complications following hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Douis; D J Dunlop; A M Pearson; J N O'Hara; S L J James
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  MR imaging of soft tissue alterations after total hip arthroplasty: comparison of classic surgical approaches.

Authors:  Christoph A Agten; Reto Sutter; Claudio Dora; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Diagnosis of peripheral bone and prosthetic joint infections: overview on the consensus documents by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement).

Authors:  Luca Maria Sconfienza; Alberto Signore; Victor Cassar-Pullicino; Maria Adriana Cataldo; Olivier Gheysens; Olivier Borens; Andrej Trampuz; Klaus Wörtler; Nicola Petrosillo; Heinz Winkler; Filip M H M Vanhoenacker; Paul C Jutte; Andor W J M Glaudemans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Updates in postoperative imaging modalities following musculoskeletal surgery.

Authors:  Pushpa Bhari Thippeswamy; Meena Nedunchelian; Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran; Dylan Riley; Harman Khatkar; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-30

6.  The role of ultrasonography in the assessment of peri-prosthetic hip complications.

Authors:  Silvana Sdao; Davide Orlandi; Alberto Aliprandi; Francesca Lacelli; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Filippo Randelli; Francesco Sardanelli; Giovanni Serafini
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-06-27

Review 7.  Postoperative Fluid Collections in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Dylan Smith; Galen Berdis; Vishavpreet Singh; Alexander Caughran; Matthew Bullock
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2022-02-19

8.  Consensus document for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a joint paper by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement).

Authors:  Alberto Signore; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Olivier Borens; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Victor Cassar-Pullicino; Andrej Trampuz; Heinz Winkler; Olivier Gheysens; Filip M H M Vanhoenacker; Nicola Petrosillo; Paul C Jutte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 9.236

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.