UNLABELLED: Radiographic arthrography and bone scintigraphy are common diagnostic procedures used for evaluating total hip prostheses. In this study, both techniques are combined, and nuclear contrast imaging (nuclear arthrography) is added. The efficacy of the procedures is evaluated. METHODS: After intravenous injection of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP), standard radiographic arthrography was performed in 105 patients (107 prostheses). The radiographic contrast medium was mixed with insoluble 111In-colloid (5 MBq/20 ml). After completion of the radiographic arthrography, nuclear arthrography was performed, and multiple-view dualisotope images (111In, 247-keV peak only) were recorded. Images were interpreted by superposition of the 111In image and the corresponding 99mTc-MDP image, the latter serving as a landmark for the position of the prosthesis and osseous structures. Findings at surgery were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: In both cemented and uncemented acetabular and femoral components, nuclear arthrography performed better than or equal to radiographic arthrography (70%-90% and 60%-75%, respectively). Nuclear arthrography had higher diagnostic accuracy than 99mTc-MDP images alone. CONCLUSION: Nuclear arthrography is a sensitive technique for detection of loosening of prostheses, offering added value over radiographic arthrography and bone scanning alone, especially for evaluation of the femoral component. Radiographic arthrography remains necessary not only for adequate deposition of contrast agents but also for detailed evaluation of osseous structures.
UNLABELLED: Radiographic arthrography and bone scintigraphy are common diagnostic procedures used for evaluating total hip prostheses. In this study, both techniques are combined, and nuclear contrast imaging (nuclear arthrography) is added. The efficacy of the procedures is evaluated. METHODS: After intravenous injection of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP), standard radiographic arthrography was performed in 105 patients (107 prostheses). The radiographic contrast medium was mixed with insoluble 111In-colloid (5 MBq/20 ml). After completion of the radiographic arthrography, nuclear arthrography was performed, and multiple-view dualisotope images (111In, 247-keV peak only) were recorded. Images were interpreted by superposition of the 111In image and the corresponding 99mTc-MDP image, the latter serving as a landmark for the position of the prosthesis and osseous structures. Findings at surgery were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: In both cemented and uncemented acetabular and femoral components, nuclear arthrography performed better than or equal to radiographic arthrography (70%-90% and 60%-75%, respectively). Nuclear arthrography had higher diagnostic accuracy than 99mTc-MDP images alone. CONCLUSION: Nuclear arthrography is a sensitive technique for detection of loosening of prostheses, offering added value over radiographic arthrography and bone scanning alone, especially for evaluation of the femoral component. Radiographic arthrography remains necessary not only for adequate deposition of contrast agents but also for detailed evaluation of osseous structures.
Authors: Benedicte Vanquickenborne; Alex Maes; Johan Nuyts; Frank Van Acker; Jos Stuyck; Michiel Mulier; Alfons Verbruggen; Luc Mortelmans Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-03-04 Impact factor: 9.236