Literature DB >> 27714569

Optimal nonlinear cue integration for sound localization.

Brian J Fischer1, Jose Luis Peña2.   

Abstract

Integration of multiple sensory cues can improve performance in detection and estimation tasks. There is an open theoretical question of the conditions under which linear or nonlinear cue combination is Bayes-optimal. We demonstrate that a neural population decoded by a population vector requires nonlinear cue combination to approximate Bayesian inference. Specifically, if cues are conditionally independent, multiplicative cue combination is optimal for the population vector. The model was tested on neural and behavioral responses in the barn owl's sound localization system where space-specific neurons owe their selectivity to multiplicative tuning to sound localization cues interaural phase (IPD) and level (ILD) differences. We found that IPD and ILD cues are approximately conditionally independent. As a result, the multiplicative combination selectivity to IPD and ILD of midbrain space-specific neurons permits a population vector to perform Bayesian cue combination. We further show that this model describes the owl's localization behavior in azimuth and elevation. This work provides theoretical justification and experimental evidence supporting the optimality of nonlinear cue combination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barn owl; Bayesian inference; Cue combination; Neural coding; Population code; Sound localization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27714569      PMCID: PMC5253079          DOI: 10.1007/s10827-016-0626-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  71 in total

1.  From postsynaptic potentials to spikes in the genesis of auditory spatial receptive fields.

Authors:  Jose Luis Pena; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Speech segregation based on sound localization.

Authors:  Nicoleta Roman; DeLiang Wang; Guy J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Optimal representation of sensory information by neural populations.

Authors:  Mehrdad Jazayeri; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-16       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Jeffrey M Beck; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Experience-dependent plasticity in the inferior colliculus: a site for visual calibration of the neural representation of auditory space in the barn owl.

Authors:  M S Brainard; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The trigger for barn owl (Tyto alba) attack is the onset of stopping or progressing of the prey.

Authors:  Michal Fux; David Eilam
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Emergence of multiplicative auditory responses in the midbrain of the barn owl.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; José Luis Peña; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A normalization model of multisensory integration.

Authors:  Tomokazu Ohshiro; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  4 in total

1.  Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Jose L Peña; Fanny Cazettes; Michael V Beckert; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effect of Stimulus-Dependent Spike Timing on Population Coding of Sound Location in the Owl's Auditory Midbrain.

Authors:  M V Beckert; B J Fischer; J L Pena
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-23

3.  How the known reference weakens the visual oblique effect: a Bayesian account of cognitive improvement by cue influence.

Authors:  Renyu Ye; Xinsheng Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Natural ITD statistics predict human auditory spatial perception.

Authors:  Rodrigo Pavão; Elyse S Sussman; Brian J Fischer; José L Peña
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.