Literature DB >> 16135987

Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Charles J Taunt1, Kanwaldeep S Sidhu, Shane A Andrew.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective, multicenter clinical review was conducted.
OBJECTIVE: To examine our experience using somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to determine if monitoring of the spinal cord with SSEPs was helpful in identifying reversible causes of neurologic impairment while performing the procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies have strongly supported the use of SSEP monitoring during complicated and upper-cervical spine surgery.
METHODS: The complete medical records of 163 patients who underwent ACDF, and who were monitored with SSEPs during the procedure between 1995 and 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. A single observer who was uninvolved with patient care abstracted these medical records. Demographic data, length of symptoms, workers' compensation status, primary diagnosis, preoperative neurologic status, number of levels fused, bone graft type, implants used, SSEP findings, postoperative neurologic status, complications, and recovery from complications were recorded. Final neurologic status was determined through phone contact with patients or outpatient charts of patients who could not be contacted personally.
RESULTS: There were 3 false positive (1.8%) intraoperative SSEP findings in which SSEP changes intraoperatively did not reflect a neurologic deterioration after surgery. There was 1 false negative (0.6%) in which a new neurologic deficit occurred after surgery, despite no change in SSEP amplitudes during the operation. There were 2 true negatives (1.2%) in which SSEP monitoring showed a preexisting neurologic deficit, which did not change during the operation.
CONCLUSION: In no instance were positive SSEP findings clinically useful in alerting the surgeon to potential intraoperative complications. Intraoperative SSEP monitoring is not helpful to the surgeon when performing routine ACDF. Additionally, ACDF is a safe procedure with a low rate of neurologic complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16135987     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000176321.02963.72

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during cervical spine surgical procedures in 246 patients.

Authors:  Andreas Eggspuehler; Martin A Sutter; Dieter Grob; Dezsö Jeszenszky; François Porchet; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring Does Not Decrease New Postoperative Neurological Deficits in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy or Spondylotic Myelopathy Undergoing One or Two Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion.

Authors:  Brandon G Wilkinson; Justin T Chang; Natalie A Glass; Cassim M Igram
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

Review 3.  Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: What Is the Evidence?

Authors:  Remi M Ajiboye; Stephen D Zoller; Akshay Sharma; Gina M Mosich; Austin Drysch; Jesse Li; Tara Reza; Sina Pourtaheri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: Analysis of 57 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Risheng Xu; Eva K Ritzl; Mohammed Sait; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Timothy F Witham; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-09-30

5.  Multi-channel motor evoked potential monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Dong-Gun Kim; Seong-Rae Jo; Young-Seop Park; Seung-Jae Hyun; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim; Kyung Seok Park
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2017-01-09

6.  Successful Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Cervical Myelopathy : Related Factors and the Effect of Increased Stimulation Intensity.

Authors:  Hyok Ki Shim; Jae Meen Lee; Dong Hwan Kim; Kyoung Hyup Nam; Byung Kwan Choi; In Ho Han
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2020-12-24

7.  Neurophysiological monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Jee-Eun Kim; Jun-Soon Kim; Sejin Yang; Jongsuk Choi; Seung-Jae Hyun; Ki-Jeong Kim; Kyung Seok Park
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2021-02-03

8.  Routine Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During ACDFs for the Treatment of Spondylotic Myelopathy and Radiculopathy Is Questionable: A Review of 15,395 Cases.

Authors:  Remi M Ajiboye; Anthony D'Oro; Adedayo O Ashana; Rafael A Buerba; Elizabeth L Lord; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang; Sina Pourtaheri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.