Literature DB >> 16481938

Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine corpectomy surgery: experience with 508 cases.

Mustafa H Khan1, Patrick N Smith, Jeffrey R Balzer, Donald Crammond, William C Welch, Peter Gerszten, Robert J Sclabassi, James D Kang, William F Donaldson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
OBJECTIVES: To review consecutive cases of cervical spine corpectomy surgery performed with intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is controversy about the utility of SSEP monitoring during anterior cervical spine surgery. There is no study in the literature that has specifically evaluated the utility of SSEP monitoring for cervical spine corpectomy surgery.
METHODS: Intraoperative SSEP tracings for 508 patients (average age, 55.7 years; 268 male, 240 female) who underwent anterior cervical fusion with single-level or multilevel corpectomies were reviewed. Intraoperative and postoperative records were analyzed to determine if any new neurologic deficits developed when the patients woke up from anesthesia.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of a new postoperative neurologic deficit in this series of patients was 2.4% (11 with nerve root injury, 1 with quadriplegia). The incidence of significant SSEP changes was 5.3% (27 of 508 patients). The most common identifiable cause of SSEP changes was hypotension, and the most common neurologic deficit was deltoid (C5) weakness. One patient had irreversible SSEP changes, and he woke up with new-onset quadriplegia. The calculated sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative SSEP monitoring for detecting impending or resultant intraoperative iatrogenic neurologic injury were 77.1% and 100%, respectively. However, if the isolated nerve root injuries are removed from the analysis, then both the calculated sensitivity and the negative predictive values were 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative SSEP monitoring can alert the surgeon to adverse iatrogenic intraoperative events with potential for neurologic injury. Most SSEP signal changes are reversible and do not result in a clinical deficit. Isolated nerve root injury appears to be the most common iatrogenic intraoperative injury during cervical spine corpectomy surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16481938     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000200163.71909.1f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

Authors:  Sebastian Siller; Constance Raith; Stefan Zausinger; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Andrea Szelenyi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during cervical spine surgical procedures in 246 patients.

Authors:  Andreas Eggspuehler; Martin A Sutter; Dieter Grob; Dezsö Jeszenszky; François Porchet; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Monitoring rate and predictability of intraoperative monitoring in patients with intradural extramedullary and epidural metastatic spinal tumors.

Authors:  H Kang; H S Gwak; S H Shin; M K Woo; I H Jeong; H Yoo; J W Kwon; S H Lee
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Predictive factors for neurological deterioration after surgical decompression for thoracic ossified yellow ligament.

Authors:  Chris Yuk Kwan Tang; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Dino Samartzis; Ka Hei Leung; Yat Wa Wong; Keith Dip Kei Luk; Kenneth Man Chee Cheung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring Does Not Decrease New Postoperative Neurological Deficits in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy or Spondylotic Myelopathy Undergoing One or Two Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion.

Authors:  Brandon G Wilkinson; Justin T Chang; Natalie A Glass; Cassim M Igram
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

6.  Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring in children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Akash J Patel; Satish Agadi; Jonathan G Thomas; Robert J Schmidt; Steven W Hwang; Daniel H Fulkerson; Chris D Glover; Andrew Jea
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: What Is the Evidence?

Authors:  Remi M Ajiboye; Stephen D Zoller; Akshay Sharma; Gina M Mosich; Austin Drysch; Jesse Li; Tara Reza; Sina Pourtaheri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: Analysis of 57 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Risheng Xu; Eva K Ritzl; Mohammed Sait; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Timothy F Witham; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-09-30

9.  What you need to know about ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament to optimize cervical spine surgery: A review.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-04-16

10.  The need to add motor evoked potential monitoring to somatosensory and electromyographic monitoring in cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.