Literature DB >> 17604806

Dynamics of saccade target selection: race model analysis of double step and search step saccade production in human and macaque.

C R Camalier1, A Gotler, A Murthy, K G Thompson, G D Logan, T J Palmeri, J D Schall.   

Abstract

We investigated how saccade target selection by humans and macaque monkeys reacts to unexpected changes of the image. This was explored using double step and search step tasks in which a target, presented alone or as a singleton in a visual search array, steps to a different location on infrequent, random trials. We report that human and macaque monkey performance are qualitatively indistinguishable. Performance is stochastic with the probability of producing a compensated saccade to the final target location decreasing with the delay of the step. Compensated saccades to the final target location are produced with latencies relative to the step that are comparable to or less than the average latency of saccades on trials with no target step. Noncompensated errors to the initial target location are produced with latencies less than the average latency of saccades on trials with no target step. Noncompensated saccades to the initial target location are followed by corrective saccades to the final target location following an intersaccade interval that decreases with the interval between the target step and the initiation of the noncompensated saccade. We show that this pattern of results cannot be accounted for by a race between two stochastically independent processes producing the saccade to the initial target location and another process producing the saccade to the final target location. However, performance can be accounted for by a race between three stochastically independent processes--a GO process producing the saccade to the initial target location, a STOP process interrupting that GO process, and another GO process producing the saccade to the final target location. Furthermore, if the STOP process and second GO process start at the same time, then the model can account for the incidence and latency of mid-flight corrections and rapid corrective saccades. This model provides a computational account of saccade production when the image changes unexpectedly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17604806      PMCID: PMC2041801          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  44 in total

Review 1.  How to fit a response time distribution.

Authors:  T Van Zandt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

2.  Countermanding saccades with auditory stop signals: testing the race model.

Authors:  H Colonius; J Ozyurt; P A Arndt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Pre-excitatory pause in frontal eye field responses.

Authors:  T Sato; J D Schall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: evidence for a competitive integration model.

Authors:  Richard Godijn; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

Review 6.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Richard A Andersen; Christopher A Buneo
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Voluntary saccadic eye movements in humans studied with a double-cue paradigm.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; V J Brown; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Parameterization of connectionist models.

Authors:  Rafal Bogacz; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-11

9.  Inactivation of macaque lateral intraparietal area delays initiation of the second saccade predominantly from contralesional eye positions in a double-saccade task.

Authors:  C S Li; R A Andersen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure.

Authors:  Guido P H Band; Maurits W van der Molen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2003-02
View more
  55 in total

1.  Functional parcellation of the inferior frontal and midcingulate cortices in a flanker-stop-change paradigm.

Authors:  Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Tom Eichele; Karsten Specht; Harald Kugel; Christo Pantev; René J Huster
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Critical role of cerebellar fastigial nucleus in programming sequences of saccades.

Authors:  Susan A King; Rosalyn M Schneider; Alessandro Serra; R John Leigh
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Ultrafast initiation of a neural race by impending errors.

Authors:  Imran Noorani; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  A common control signal and a ballistic stage can explain the control of coordinated eye-hand movements.

Authors:  Atul Gopal; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural control of visual search by frontal eye field: effects of unexpected target displacement on visual selection and saccade preparation.

Authors:  Aditya Murthy; Supriya Ray; Stephanie M Shorter; Jeffrey D Schall; Kirk G Thompson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Dual LATER-unit model predicts saccadic reaction time distributions in gap, step and appearance tasks.

Authors:  Giles W Story; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Response inhibition and response monitoring in a saccadic double-step task in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Jeffrey D Schall; Gordon D Logan; Sohee Park
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-11

9.  The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.