Literature DB >> 18985328

Dual LATER-unit model predicts saccadic reaction time distributions in gap, step and appearance tasks.

Giles W Story1, R H S Carpenter.   

Abstract

Saccadic latencies have long been known to depend on the relative timing of the appearance of the new target, and offset of the original fixation target. Previous studies have tended to conclude that two separate effects are at work, one equivalent to competitive inhibition from the fixation target, and the other due to its offset providing a warning that shortens latency. In this study, we propose a simpler explanation, based on a well-established model of reaction time, LATER (linear approach to threshold with ergodic rate), that in addition to predicting mean latencies also--more challengingly--predicts latency distributions. We show that observed distributions, using gap, step and appearance tasks under three conditions of prior probability, can be accurately predicted by using a pair of LATER units, one corresponding to fixation target offset and the other to peripheral target onset. Because fixation offset is probabilistically associated with target appearance, when the fixation unit is activated it increases the target's decision signal (that represents probability) in a fixed proportion, speeding responses. In contrast, when the fixation target remains present, the fixation unit is not activated, and responses are slower. Both these effects generate characteristic changes in the shapes of the latency distributions that can be accurately predicted by the model.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18985328     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1624-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  The influence of urgency on decision time.

Authors:  B A Reddi; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Warning signals influence motor processing.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Express saccades: is there a separate population in humans?

Authors:  M G Wenban-Smith; J M Findlay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of reappearance of fixated and attended stimuli upon saccadic reaction time.

Authors:  D Braun; B G Breitmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone.

Authors:  R Walker; H Deubel; W X Schneider; J M Findlay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata. IV. Relation of substantia nigra to superior colliculus.

Authors:  O Hikosaka; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Countermanding saccades in humans.

Authors:  D P Hanes; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Modification of saccadic eye movements by GABA-related substances. II. Effects of muscimol in monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata.

Authors:  O Hikosaka; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. II. Reversible activation and deactivation.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

1.  Real and implied motion at the center of gaze.

Authors:  Alper Açik; Andreas Bartel; Peter König
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Fixation disengagement enhances peripheral perceptual processing: evidence for a perceptual gap effect.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Working memory retrieval as a decision process.

Authors:  Benjamin Pearson; Julius Raskevicius; Paul M Bays; Yoni Pertzov; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Rapid decision-making under risk.

Authors:  Robert Adam; Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.065

5.  Implicit and explicit timing in oculomotor control.

Authors:  Ilhame Ameqrane; Pierre Pouget; Nicolas Wattiez; Roger Carpenter; Marcus Missal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  LATER models of neural decision behavior in choice tasks.

Authors:  Imran Noorani
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.