Literature DB >> 26226854

Ultrafast initiation of a neural race by impending errors.

Imran Noorani1, R H S Carpenter1.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: The brain makes decisions by means of races between neural units representing alternative choices. In the present study, we record the eyemovements made in the Wheeless task, when a visual stimulus is followed after a short delay by another stimulus demanding a different response. The behaviour can be very precisely described as a race between three independent decision processes: one Go process for each of the responses, and a Stop process that tries to cancel the first, now erroneous, response. To explain the high success rate for cancellation that we observe, the onset time for the Stop process must be some 10-20 ms shorter than for Go. As well as extending our understanding of the dynamics of complex decision-making, this task provides a rapid, non-invasive method for quantifying disorders of higher neural function. ABSTRACT: The brain makes decisions by means of races between neural units representing alternative choices, and such models can predict behaviour in decision tasks in a precisely quantitative way. But what is less clear is how soon after the stimulus the race actually starts. In the present study, we re-visit a complex decision experiment: the Wheeless task, in which a saccadic stimulus is followed after a short delay by a second stimulus, with the subject sometimes making a saccade to the first, now inappropriate, stimulus, and sometimes going straight to the correct one. We demonstrate that a simple model with three accumulator units, two 'Go' and one 'Stop', can then account in detail for the individual responses made, as well as their timing. This complex decision-making behaviour is predicted directly for each individual subject by their performance in a simple step saccadic task, which identifies the two free parameters that are specific for each subject. By contrast to previous assumptions, we find that it is necessary for the onset time of the Stop unit to be shorter than for Go by 10-20 ms. This suggests a specifically fast mechanism for altering responses in situations where urgent action is needed to prevent an impending error.
© 2015 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2015 The Physiological Society.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26226854      PMCID: PMC4594249          DOI: 10.1113/JP270842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  52 in total

1.  Neuronal switching of sensorimotor transformations for antisaccades.

Authors:  M Zhang; S Barash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The influence of urgency on decision time.

Authors:  B A Reddi; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Contrast, probability, and saccadic latency; evidence for independence of detection and decision.

Authors:  R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Influence of history on saccade countermanding performance in humans and macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Erik E Emeric; Joshua W Brown; Leanne Boucher; Roger H S Carpenter; Doug P Hanes; Robin Harris; Gordon D Logan; Reena N Mashru; Martin Paré; Pierre Pouget; Veit Stuphorn; Tracy L Taylor; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades.

Authors:  Leanne Boucher; Thomas J Palmeri; Gordon D Logan; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Full reaction time distributions reveal the complexity of neural decision-making.

Authors:  Imran Noorani; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Some observations concerning saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  M K Komoda; L Festinger; L J Phillips; R H Duckman; R A Young
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Visual latencies in areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  L G Nowak; M H Munk; P Girard; J Bullier
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Countermanding saccades in humans.

Authors:  D P Hanes; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Perceptual decision making in less than 30 milliseconds.

Authors:  Terrence R Stanford; Swetha Shankar; Dino P Massoglia; M Gabriela Costello; Emilio Salinas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cortical control and performance monitoring of interrupting and redirecting movements.

Authors:  Pierre Pouget; Aditya Murthy; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Towards a unifying mechanism for cancelling movements.

Authors:  Imran Noorani
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Corrective response times in a coordinated eye-head-arm countermanding task.

Authors:  Gordon Tao; Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The random dot tachistogram: a novel task that elucidates the functional architecture of decision.

Authors:  Wilfried Genest; Robert Hammond; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Commentary: Express saccades and superior colliculus responses are sensitive to short-wavelength cone contrast.

Authors:  Olivier A Coubard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.